(Fehlende) Anwesenheit bei Begutachtungsprozessen: Zum Wandel der sozialen Interaktionen im virtuellen Format

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Laura Paruschke
  • Eva Barlösius
  • Axel Philipps

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Translated title of the contribution(Absence of) Attendance in Peer Review Processes: Concerning the Transformation of Social Interactions in the Virtual Format
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)391-403
Number of pages13
JournalZeitschrift fur Soziologie
Volume52
Issue number4
Early online date31 Oct 2023
Publication statusPublished - 21 Nov 2023

Abstract

Socially negotiated orders of interaction essentially determine the flow of social situations. In reviews with on-site audits, different social situations exist, which in sum contribute to the production of formally correct and justifiable decisions. But how are the interactions shaped when review procedures are transferred to virtuality? What are the consequences for the review process? Using qualitative interviews, the significance of social situations and their inherent orders of interaction for those involved in peer review in both the present and virtual formats is investigated based on two funding programs of the German Research Foundation (DFG). The results show that virtual meetings limit the possibilities for interaction among all0 participants. In particular, it is problematic that situations with a situationally regulated interaction order are missing, because according to the participants, they are essential for review processes to run smoothly and in such a way that all relevant aspects can be included.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

(Fehlende) Anwesenheit bei Begutachtungsprozessen: Zum Wandel der sozialen Interaktionen im virtuellen Format. / Paruschke, Laura; Barlösius, Eva; Philipps, Axel.
In: Zeitschrift fur Soziologie, Vol. 52, No. 4, 21.11.2023, p. 391-403.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Paruschke L, Barlösius E, Philipps A. (Fehlende) Anwesenheit bei Begutachtungsprozessen: Zum Wandel der sozialen Interaktionen im virtuellen Format. Zeitschrift fur Soziologie. 2023 Nov 21;52(4):391-403. Epub 2023 Oct 31. doi: 10.1515/zfsoz-2023-2027
Paruschke, Laura ; Barlösius, Eva ; Philipps, Axel. / (Fehlende) Anwesenheit bei Begutachtungsprozessen : Zum Wandel der sozialen Interaktionen im virtuellen Format. In: Zeitschrift fur Soziologie. 2023 ; Vol. 52, No. 4. pp. 391-403.
Download
@article{74b792ba6d264ad0b2f7b153ab8cc318,
title = "(Fehlende) Anwesenheit bei Begutachtungsprozessen: Zum Wandel der sozialen Interaktionen im virtuellen Format",
abstract = "Socially negotiated orders of interaction essentially determine the flow of social situations. In reviews with on-site audits, different social situations exist, which in sum contribute to the production of formally correct and justifiable decisions. But how are the interactions shaped when review procedures are transferred to virtuality? What are the consequences for the review process? Using qualitative interviews, the significance of social situations and their inherent orders of interaction for those involved in peer review in both the present and virtual formats is investigated based on two funding programs of the German Research Foundation (DFG). The results show that virtual meetings limit the possibilities for interaction among all0 participants. In particular, it is problematic that situations with a situationally regulated interaction order are missing, because according to the participants, they are essential for review processes to run smoothly and in such a way that all relevant aspects can be included.",
keywords = "Begutachtungsverfahren, Interaktion, soziale Situation, Virtualit{\"a}t, Wissenschaft, Review Processes, Virtuality, Interaction, Social Situation, Science",
author = "Laura Paruschke and Eva Barl{\"o}sius and Axel Philipps",
year = "2023",
month = nov,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1515/zfsoz-2023-2027",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "52",
pages = "391--403",
journal = "Zeitschrift fur Soziologie",
issn = "0340-1804",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - (Fehlende) Anwesenheit bei Begutachtungsprozessen

T2 - Zum Wandel der sozialen Interaktionen im virtuellen Format

AU - Paruschke, Laura

AU - Barlösius, Eva

AU - Philipps, Axel

PY - 2023/11/21

Y1 - 2023/11/21

N2 - Socially negotiated orders of interaction essentially determine the flow of social situations. In reviews with on-site audits, different social situations exist, which in sum contribute to the production of formally correct and justifiable decisions. But how are the interactions shaped when review procedures are transferred to virtuality? What are the consequences for the review process? Using qualitative interviews, the significance of social situations and their inherent orders of interaction for those involved in peer review in both the present and virtual formats is investigated based on two funding programs of the German Research Foundation (DFG). The results show that virtual meetings limit the possibilities for interaction among all0 participants. In particular, it is problematic that situations with a situationally regulated interaction order are missing, because according to the participants, they are essential for review processes to run smoothly and in such a way that all relevant aspects can be included.

AB - Socially negotiated orders of interaction essentially determine the flow of social situations. In reviews with on-site audits, different social situations exist, which in sum contribute to the production of formally correct and justifiable decisions. But how are the interactions shaped when review procedures are transferred to virtuality? What are the consequences for the review process? Using qualitative interviews, the significance of social situations and their inherent orders of interaction for those involved in peer review in both the present and virtual formats is investigated based on two funding programs of the German Research Foundation (DFG). The results show that virtual meetings limit the possibilities for interaction among all0 participants. In particular, it is problematic that situations with a situationally regulated interaction order are missing, because according to the participants, they are essential for review processes to run smoothly and in such a way that all relevant aspects can be included.

KW - Begutachtungsverfahren

KW - Interaktion

KW - soziale Situation

KW - Virtualität

KW - Wissenschaft

KW - Review Processes

KW - Virtuality

KW - Interaction

KW - Social Situation

KW - Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175848616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/zfsoz-2023-2027

DO - 10.1515/zfsoz-2023-2027

M3 - Artikel

AN - SCOPUS:85175848616

VL - 52

SP - 391

EP - 403

JO - Zeitschrift fur Soziologie

JF - Zeitschrift fur Soziologie

SN - 0340-1804

IS - 4

ER -