Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 418-423 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Procedia CIRP |
| Volume | 98 |
| Early online date | 10 Mar 2021 |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
| Event | 28th CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, LCE 2021 - Jaipur, India Duration: 10 Mar 2021 → 12 Mar 2021 |
Abstract
In consequence of the technological advances of the last few decades, factories emerged to highly complex systems that consist of numerous factory elements like production machines, technical building services and the building shell. These factory elements are characterized by individual life cycles that differ in their duration and life cycle behavior. Consequently, the factory life cycle is composed of multiple overlapping life cycles. The fact that the life cycle of some factory elements (e.g. the building shell) exceeds the life cycle of other elements over many times (e.g. of machines) presents a challenge for factory planners. In particular, factory planners struggle to understand the contribution of single factory elements on the total factory life cycle. Consequently, it is hard to systematically synchronize the inherent life cycles of a factory while adhering to manifold requirements. Against this background, the goal of this paper is to develop a methodology that supports factory planners in the evaluation of the factory life cycle. The proposed methodology enhances the understanding of how factory elements contribute to the factory life cycle and what is the current life cycle state of the entire factory. To this end, the factory system is broken down on its constituting elements. A modified failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is applied to assess their life cycle priority according to economic, environmental and technical criteria. The methodology is exemplarily demonstrated on a pilot scale battery production system.
Keywords
- Factory element, Factory life cycle, Factory planning, Life cycle priority
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Engineering(all)
- Control and Systems Engineering
- Engineering(all)
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Procedia CIRP, Vol. 98, 2021, p. 418-423.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Factory life cycle evaluation through integrated analysis of factory elements
AU - Dér, Antal
AU - Hingst, Lennart
AU - Karl, Alexander
AU - Nyhuis, Peter
AU - Herrmann, Christoph
N1 - Funding Information: Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – 412409961.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - In consequence of the technological advances of the last few decades, factories emerged to highly complex systems that consist of numerous factory elements like production machines, technical building services and the building shell. These factory elements are characterized by individual life cycles that differ in their duration and life cycle behavior. Consequently, the factory life cycle is composed of multiple overlapping life cycles. The fact that the life cycle of some factory elements (e.g. the building shell) exceeds the life cycle of other elements over many times (e.g. of machines) presents a challenge for factory planners. In particular, factory planners struggle to understand the contribution of single factory elements on the total factory life cycle. Consequently, it is hard to systematically synchronize the inherent life cycles of a factory while adhering to manifold requirements. Against this background, the goal of this paper is to develop a methodology that supports factory planners in the evaluation of the factory life cycle. The proposed methodology enhances the understanding of how factory elements contribute to the factory life cycle and what is the current life cycle state of the entire factory. To this end, the factory system is broken down on its constituting elements. A modified failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is applied to assess their life cycle priority according to economic, environmental and technical criteria. The methodology is exemplarily demonstrated on a pilot scale battery production system.
AB - In consequence of the technological advances of the last few decades, factories emerged to highly complex systems that consist of numerous factory elements like production machines, technical building services and the building shell. These factory elements are characterized by individual life cycles that differ in their duration and life cycle behavior. Consequently, the factory life cycle is composed of multiple overlapping life cycles. The fact that the life cycle of some factory elements (e.g. the building shell) exceeds the life cycle of other elements over many times (e.g. of machines) presents a challenge for factory planners. In particular, factory planners struggle to understand the contribution of single factory elements on the total factory life cycle. Consequently, it is hard to systematically synchronize the inherent life cycles of a factory while adhering to manifold requirements. Against this background, the goal of this paper is to develop a methodology that supports factory planners in the evaluation of the factory life cycle. The proposed methodology enhances the understanding of how factory elements contribute to the factory life cycle and what is the current life cycle state of the entire factory. To this end, the factory system is broken down on its constituting elements. A modified failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is applied to assess their life cycle priority according to economic, environmental and technical criteria. The methodology is exemplarily demonstrated on a pilot scale battery production system.
KW - Factory element
KW - Factory life cycle
KW - Factory planning
KW - Life cycle priority
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102620802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.127
DO - 10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.127
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85102620802
VL - 98
SP - 418
EP - 423
JO - Procedia CIRP
JF - Procedia CIRP
SN - 2212-8271
T2 - 28th CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, LCE 2021
Y2 - 10 March 2021 through 12 March 2021
ER -