Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 103671 |
Journal | Coastal engineering |
Volume | 158 |
Early online date | 26 Feb 2020 |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2020 |
Abstract
The analysis of damage in rubble mound scour protections is crucial for the armour stability assessment. Former methodologies focused on the analysis of the maximum damage number. This work introduces a complementary methodology to determine and characterize damage statistical distribution based on a flexible arrangement of sub-areas. The sub-areas are overlapping and can be varied in size, allowing a refined damage analysis. To capture the variation of damage with changing sub-area layout, the methodology is coupled with a statistical evaluation of damage numbers, which is enabled by the definition of a grid ratio between armour stone size and sub-area size, (Dn50)2/Asub. The methodology is applied to high resolution bathymetric surveys from two stability tests of large-scale rip-rap scour protection around a monopile foundation and combined wave and current loading. Results show that the methodology provides a complementary understanding of damage distribution to the maximum damage acquired from previous methodologies. In addition, it allows a comparison of damage characteristics between tests despite different shapes of the foundation. Research concludes that the size of the sub-areas influences significantly the damage description. Characteristic measures as the maximum damage number and standard deviation become stable at a grid ratio (Dn50)2/Asub equal to 1/4.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Science(all)
- Environmental Engineering
- Engineering(all)
- Ocean Engineering
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Coastal engineering, Vol. 158, 103671, 06.2020.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Extended characterization of damage in rubble mound scour protections
AU - Fazeres-Ferradosa, Tiago
AU - Welzel, Mario
AU - Schendel, Alexander
AU - Baelus, Leen
AU - Santos, Paulo Rosa
AU - Pinto, Francisco Taveira
N1 - Funding information: [ This work is supported by the project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-032170 (Oracle project), funded by the European Fund for Regional Development (FEDER) , through the COMPETE2020, the Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) and FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC). The authors thank all the partners and team members of PROTEUS project, Ghent University, IMDC, HR Wallingford, University of Porto, Leibniz University Hannover and MOW Vlaanderen. The work described in this publication was supported by the European Community's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program through the grant to HYDRALAB-PLUS, Contract no. 654110. The authors deeply acknowledge to Dr. Leen De Vos for the enlightening discussions on damage analysis of scour protections and hereby recognise the importance of her work to the development of the present methodology. Dr. Fazeres-Ferradosa acknowledges Dr. Francisco Fazeres (ULSAM) for opening way to the remarkable wonders of science and research, an opportunity which the author will never be able to repay. This work is supported by the project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-032170 (Oracle project), funded by the European Fund for Regional Development (FEDER), through the COMPETE2020, the Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) and FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC). The authors thank all the partners and team members of PROTEUS project, Ghent University, IMDC, HR Wallingford, University of Porto, Leibniz University Hannover and MOW Vlaanderen. The work described in this publication was supported by the European Community's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program through the grant to HYDRALAB-PLUS, Contract no. 654110. The authors deeply acknowledge to Dr. Leen De Vos for the enlightening discussions on damage analysis of scour protections and hereby recognise the importance of her work to the development of the present methodology. Dr. Fazeres-Ferradosa acknowledges Dr. Francisco Fazeres (ULSAM) for opening way to the remarkable wonders of science and research, an opportunity which the author will never be able to repay.
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - The analysis of damage in rubble mound scour protections is crucial for the armour stability assessment. Former methodologies focused on the analysis of the maximum damage number. This work introduces a complementary methodology to determine and characterize damage statistical distribution based on a flexible arrangement of sub-areas. The sub-areas are overlapping and can be varied in size, allowing a refined damage analysis. To capture the variation of damage with changing sub-area layout, the methodology is coupled with a statistical evaluation of damage numbers, which is enabled by the definition of a grid ratio between armour stone size and sub-area size, (Dn50)2/Asub. The methodology is applied to high resolution bathymetric surveys from two stability tests of large-scale rip-rap scour protection around a monopile foundation and combined wave and current loading. Results show that the methodology provides a complementary understanding of damage distribution to the maximum damage acquired from previous methodologies. In addition, it allows a comparison of damage characteristics between tests despite different shapes of the foundation. Research concludes that the size of the sub-areas influences significantly the damage description. Characteristic measures as the maximum damage number and standard deviation become stable at a grid ratio (Dn50)2/Asub equal to 1/4.
AB - The analysis of damage in rubble mound scour protections is crucial for the armour stability assessment. Former methodologies focused on the analysis of the maximum damage number. This work introduces a complementary methodology to determine and characterize damage statistical distribution based on a flexible arrangement of sub-areas. The sub-areas are overlapping and can be varied in size, allowing a refined damage analysis. To capture the variation of damage with changing sub-area layout, the methodology is coupled with a statistical evaluation of damage numbers, which is enabled by the definition of a grid ratio between armour stone size and sub-area size, (Dn50)2/Asub. The methodology is applied to high resolution bathymetric surveys from two stability tests of large-scale rip-rap scour protection around a monopile foundation and combined wave and current loading. Results show that the methodology provides a complementary understanding of damage distribution to the maximum damage acquired from previous methodologies. In addition, it allows a comparison of damage characteristics between tests despite different shapes of the foundation. Research concludes that the size of the sub-areas influences significantly the damage description. Characteristic measures as the maximum damage number and standard deviation become stable at a grid ratio (Dn50)2/Asub equal to 1/4.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080089191&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103671
DO - 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103671
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85080089191
VL - 158
JO - Coastal engineering
JF - Coastal engineering
SN - 0378-3839
M1 - 103671
ER -