Experience: Open Fiscal Datasets, Common Issues, and Recommendations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Fathoni A. Musyaffa
  • Christiane Engels
  • Maria Esther Vidal
  • Fabrizio Orlandi
  • Sören Auer

External Research Organisations

  • University of Bonn
  • German National Library of Science and Technology (TIB)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems (IAIS)
  • Universidad Simon Bolivar
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number19
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Data and Information Quality
Volume9
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 12 Apr 2018

Abstract

Public administrations are continuously publishing open data, increasing the amount of government open data over time. The published data includes budgets and spending as part of fiscal data; publishing these data is an important part of transparent and accountable governance. However, open fiscal data should also meet open data publication guidelines. When requirements in data guidelines are not met, effective data analysis over published datasets cannot be performed effectively. In this article, we present Open Fiscal Data Publication (OFDP), a framework to assess the quality of open fiscal datasets. We also present an extensive open fiscal data assessment and common data quality issues found; additionally, open fiscal data publishing guidelines are presented. We studied and surveyed main quality factors for open fiscal datasets. Moreover, the collected quality factors have been scored according to the results of a questionnaire to score quality factors within the OFDP assessment framework. We gather and comprehensively analyze a representative set of 77 fiscal datasets from several public administrations across different regions at different levels (e.g., supranational, national, municipality). We characterize quality issues commonly arising in these datasets. Our assessment shows that there are many quality factors in fiscal data publication that still need to be taken care of so that the data can be analyzed effectively. Our proposed guidelines allow for publishing open fiscal data where these quality issues are avoided.

Keywords

    Open data assessment, Open fiscal data

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Experience: Open Fiscal Datasets, Common Issues, and Recommendations. / Musyaffa, Fathoni A.; Engels, Christiane; Vidal, Maria Esther et al.
In: Journal of Data and Information Quality, Vol. 9, No. 4, 19, 12.04.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Musyaffa, FA, Engels, C, Vidal, ME, Orlandi, F & Auer, S 2018, 'Experience: Open Fiscal Datasets, Common Issues, and Recommendations', Journal of Data and Information Quality, vol. 9, no. 4, 19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3190576
Musyaffa, F. A., Engels, C., Vidal, M. E., Orlandi, F., & Auer, S. (2018). Experience: Open Fiscal Datasets, Common Issues, and Recommendations. Journal of Data and Information Quality, 9(4), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3190576
Musyaffa FA, Engels C, Vidal ME, Orlandi F, Auer S. Experience: Open Fiscal Datasets, Common Issues, and Recommendations. Journal of Data and Information Quality. 2018 Apr 12;9(4):19. doi: 10.1145/3190576
Musyaffa, Fathoni A. ; Engels, Christiane ; Vidal, Maria Esther et al. / Experience : Open Fiscal Datasets, Common Issues, and Recommendations. In: Journal of Data and Information Quality. 2018 ; Vol. 9, No. 4.
Download
@article{46a4bcf348d54fe386f24b03227d51a8,
title = "Experience: Open Fiscal Datasets, Common Issues, and Recommendations",
abstract = "Public administrations are continuously publishing open data, increasing the amount of government open data over time. The published data includes budgets and spending as part of fiscal data; publishing these data is an important part of transparent and accountable governance. However, open fiscal data should also meet open data publication guidelines. When requirements in data guidelines are not met, effective data analysis over published datasets cannot be performed effectively. In this article, we present Open Fiscal Data Publication (OFDP), a framework to assess the quality of open fiscal datasets. We also present an extensive open fiscal data assessment and common data quality issues found; additionally, open fiscal data publishing guidelines are presented. We studied and surveyed main quality factors for open fiscal datasets. Moreover, the collected quality factors have been scored according to the results of a questionnaire to score quality factors within the OFDP assessment framework. We gather and comprehensively analyze a representative set of 77 fiscal datasets from several public administrations across different regions at different levels (e.g., supranational, national, municipality). We characterize quality issues commonly arising in these datasets. Our assessment shows that there are many quality factors in fiscal data publication that still need to be taken care of so that the data can be analyzed effectively. Our proposed guidelines allow for publishing open fiscal data where these quality issues are avoided.",
keywords = "Open data assessment, Open fiscal data",
author = "Musyaffa, {Fathoni A.} and Christiane Engels and Vidal, {Maria Esther} and Fabrizio Orlandi and S{\"o}ren Auer",
year = "2018",
month = apr,
day = "12",
doi = "10.1145/3190576",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
number = "4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experience

T2 - Open Fiscal Datasets, Common Issues, and Recommendations

AU - Musyaffa, Fathoni A.

AU - Engels, Christiane

AU - Vidal, Maria Esther

AU - Orlandi, Fabrizio

AU - Auer, Sören

PY - 2018/4/12

Y1 - 2018/4/12

N2 - Public administrations are continuously publishing open data, increasing the amount of government open data over time. The published data includes budgets and spending as part of fiscal data; publishing these data is an important part of transparent and accountable governance. However, open fiscal data should also meet open data publication guidelines. When requirements in data guidelines are not met, effective data analysis over published datasets cannot be performed effectively. In this article, we present Open Fiscal Data Publication (OFDP), a framework to assess the quality of open fiscal datasets. We also present an extensive open fiscal data assessment and common data quality issues found; additionally, open fiscal data publishing guidelines are presented. We studied and surveyed main quality factors for open fiscal datasets. Moreover, the collected quality factors have been scored according to the results of a questionnaire to score quality factors within the OFDP assessment framework. We gather and comprehensively analyze a representative set of 77 fiscal datasets from several public administrations across different regions at different levels (e.g., supranational, national, municipality). We characterize quality issues commonly arising in these datasets. Our assessment shows that there are many quality factors in fiscal data publication that still need to be taken care of so that the data can be analyzed effectively. Our proposed guidelines allow for publishing open fiscal data where these quality issues are avoided.

AB - Public administrations are continuously publishing open data, increasing the amount of government open data over time. The published data includes budgets and spending as part of fiscal data; publishing these data is an important part of transparent and accountable governance. However, open fiscal data should also meet open data publication guidelines. When requirements in data guidelines are not met, effective data analysis over published datasets cannot be performed effectively. In this article, we present Open Fiscal Data Publication (OFDP), a framework to assess the quality of open fiscal datasets. We also present an extensive open fiscal data assessment and common data quality issues found; additionally, open fiscal data publishing guidelines are presented. We studied and surveyed main quality factors for open fiscal datasets. Moreover, the collected quality factors have been scored according to the results of a questionnaire to score quality factors within the OFDP assessment framework. We gather and comprehensively analyze a representative set of 77 fiscal datasets from several public administrations across different regions at different levels (e.g., supranational, national, municipality). We characterize quality issues commonly arising in these datasets. Our assessment shows that there are many quality factors in fiscal data publication that still need to be taken care of so that the data can be analyzed effectively. Our proposed guidelines allow for publishing open fiscal data where these quality issues are avoided.

KW - Open data assessment

KW - Open fiscal data

U2 - 10.1145/3190576

DO - 10.1145/3190576

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064543872

VL - 9

JO - Journal of Data and Information Quality

JF - Journal of Data and Information Quality

SN - 1936-1955

IS - 4

M1 - 19

ER -

By the same author(s)