Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5431-5447 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Quality and Quantity |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 23 Jan 2023 |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2023 |
Abstract
This experimental study aims to check and improve the quality of 16 established survey measures of political solidarities and related concepts, such as redistribution and social trust. Political solidarities are defined as one’s willingness to share the costs that result from public redistribution that favours people other than oneself and thus constitute a subset of welfare state attitudes. The pre-registered study plan included suggestions for the development of improved rating scales, which we defined as five-point, end verbalized rating scales without non-substantive answer options. The overall results from an experimental online survey in Germany indicate differences in response effort in terms of response times but almost no differences in data quality in terms of criterion validity. Thus, the 16 survey measures show solid instrument validity as well as minor improvements in respondents’ response times. Indeed, the measures are (at least) in the online survey world of Germany of high-quality and warrant inclusion in future surveys with small efficiency gains still attainable.
Keywords
- Data quality, Online survey, Political solidarities, Rating scale design, Response behaviour
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Mathematics(all)
- Statistics and Probability
- Social Sciences(all)
- General Social Sciences
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Quality and Quantity, Vol. 57, No. 6, 12.2023, p. 5431-5447.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating the response effort and data quality of established political solidarity measures
T2 - a pre-registered experimental test in an online survey of the German adult resident population in 2021
AU - Goerres, Achim
AU - Höhne, Jan Karem
N1 - Funding Information: We would like to thank Jakob Kemper (University of Duisburg-Essen) for his great assistance during the preparation of this study. We are also grateful to numerous members of the Working Group for Empirical Political Science (University Duisburg-Essen) for their great support during survey pre-testing. The respondents were reached by a sample-only commission to the survey company Forsa that drew a sample of their online access panel. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. We acknowledge financial support by the European Research Council (ERC; grant number: 864818) through the Consolidator Grant POLITSOLID (2021-25, https://bit.ly/politsolid ).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - This experimental study aims to check and improve the quality of 16 established survey measures of political solidarities and related concepts, such as redistribution and social trust. Political solidarities are defined as one’s willingness to share the costs that result from public redistribution that favours people other than oneself and thus constitute a subset of welfare state attitudes. The pre-registered study plan included suggestions for the development of improved rating scales, which we defined as five-point, end verbalized rating scales without non-substantive answer options. The overall results from an experimental online survey in Germany indicate differences in response effort in terms of response times but almost no differences in data quality in terms of criterion validity. Thus, the 16 survey measures show solid instrument validity as well as minor improvements in respondents’ response times. Indeed, the measures are (at least) in the online survey world of Germany of high-quality and warrant inclusion in future surveys with small efficiency gains still attainable.
AB - This experimental study aims to check and improve the quality of 16 established survey measures of political solidarities and related concepts, such as redistribution and social trust. Political solidarities are defined as one’s willingness to share the costs that result from public redistribution that favours people other than oneself and thus constitute a subset of welfare state attitudes. The pre-registered study plan included suggestions for the development of improved rating scales, which we defined as five-point, end verbalized rating scales without non-substantive answer options. The overall results from an experimental online survey in Germany indicate differences in response effort in terms of response times but almost no differences in data quality in terms of criterion validity. Thus, the 16 survey measures show solid instrument validity as well as minor improvements in respondents’ response times. Indeed, the measures are (at least) in the online survey world of Germany of high-quality and warrant inclusion in future surveys with small efficiency gains still attainable.
KW - Data quality
KW - Online survey
KW - Political solidarities
KW - Rating scale design
KW - Response behaviour
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146705662&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11135-022-01594-4
DO - 10.1007/s11135-022-01594-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85146705662
VL - 57
SP - 5431
EP - 5447
JO - Quality and Quantity
JF - Quality and Quantity
SN - 0033-5177
IS - 6
ER -