EU food safety standards, pesticide use and farm-level productivity: The case of high-value crops in Kenya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Solomon Asfaw
  • Dagmar Mithöfer
  • Hermann Waibel

External Research Organisations

  • International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics
  • International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology Nairobi
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)645-667
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of agricultural economics
Volume60
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 10 Aug 2009

Abstract

This article provides an empirical analysis of the impact of European Union (EU) private food safety standards on pesticide use and farm-level productivity among small-scale vegetable producers in Kenya. We apply an extended three-stage damage control production framework, accounting for multiple endogeneity problems, to farm-level data collected from a random cross-sectional sample of 539 small-scale producers. Estimation results show that farmers producing vegetables for the domestic market use significantly lower quantities of pesticides than do export farmers. However, contrary to findings elsewhere, the econometric evidence here shows that both domestic and export-oriented vegetable farmers in Kenya use pesticides at levels below the economic optimum. The results also show that the adoption of standards by export farmers does not have any significant impact on total pesticide use. However, adopter categories are distinguishable in terms of types of pesticide used, i.e. adopters use safer pesticides based on World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The third-stage structural revenue model results demonstrate that adoption of standards has a positive and significant impact on revenue raised in vegetable production. Nevertheless, farmers producing for the export market are indistinguishable from those producing for the domestic farmers in terms of the total revenue earned from producing vegetables during the rainy season, on a 'per acre' basis. Although standards can potentially prevent resource-poor smallholders from maintaining their position in the lucrative export markets, they can also result in positive changes in the production systems of those small-scale farmers who adopt it, as shown by these results.

Keywords

    Damage control, Food safety standards, High-value crops, Kenya, Productivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

EU food safety standards, pesticide use and farm-level productivity: The case of high-value crops in Kenya. / Asfaw, Solomon; Mithöfer, Dagmar; Waibel, Hermann.
In: Journal of agricultural economics, Vol. 60, No. 3, 10.08.2009, p. 645-667.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Asfaw S, Mithöfer D, Waibel H. EU food safety standards, pesticide use and farm-level productivity: The case of high-value crops in Kenya. Journal of agricultural economics. 2009 Aug 10;60(3):645-667. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2009.00205.x
Asfaw, Solomon ; Mithöfer, Dagmar ; Waibel, Hermann. / EU food safety standards, pesticide use and farm-level productivity : The case of high-value crops in Kenya. In: Journal of agricultural economics. 2009 ; Vol. 60, No. 3. pp. 645-667.
Download
@article{afb6ded1007542589053b22c2b17020a,
title = "EU food safety standards, pesticide use and farm-level productivity: The case of high-value crops in Kenya",
abstract = "This article provides an empirical analysis of the impact of European Union (EU) private food safety standards on pesticide use and farm-level productivity among small-scale vegetable producers in Kenya. We apply an extended three-stage damage control production framework, accounting for multiple endogeneity problems, to farm-level data collected from a random cross-sectional sample of 539 small-scale producers. Estimation results show that farmers producing vegetables for the domestic market use significantly lower quantities of pesticides than do export farmers. However, contrary to findings elsewhere, the econometric evidence here shows that both domestic and export-oriented vegetable farmers in Kenya use pesticides at levels below the economic optimum. The results also show that the adoption of standards by export farmers does not have any significant impact on total pesticide use. However, adopter categories are distinguishable in terms of types of pesticide used, i.e. adopters use safer pesticides based on World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The third-stage structural revenue model results demonstrate that adoption of standards has a positive and significant impact on revenue raised in vegetable production. Nevertheless, farmers producing for the export market are indistinguishable from those producing for the domestic farmers in terms of the total revenue earned from producing vegetables during the rainy season, on a 'per acre' basis. Although standards can potentially prevent resource-poor smallholders from maintaining their position in the lucrative export markets, they can also result in positive changes in the production systems of those small-scale farmers who adopt it, as shown by these results.",
keywords = "Damage control, Food safety standards, High-value crops, Kenya, Productivity",
author = "Solomon Asfaw and Dagmar Mith{\"o}fer and Hermann Waibel",
year = "2009",
month = aug,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1477-9552.2009.00205.x",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "645--667",
journal = "Journal of agricultural economics",
issn = "0021-857X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - EU food safety standards, pesticide use and farm-level productivity

T2 - The case of high-value crops in Kenya

AU - Asfaw, Solomon

AU - Mithöfer, Dagmar

AU - Waibel, Hermann

PY - 2009/8/10

Y1 - 2009/8/10

N2 - This article provides an empirical analysis of the impact of European Union (EU) private food safety standards on pesticide use and farm-level productivity among small-scale vegetable producers in Kenya. We apply an extended three-stage damage control production framework, accounting for multiple endogeneity problems, to farm-level data collected from a random cross-sectional sample of 539 small-scale producers. Estimation results show that farmers producing vegetables for the domestic market use significantly lower quantities of pesticides than do export farmers. However, contrary to findings elsewhere, the econometric evidence here shows that both domestic and export-oriented vegetable farmers in Kenya use pesticides at levels below the economic optimum. The results also show that the adoption of standards by export farmers does not have any significant impact on total pesticide use. However, adopter categories are distinguishable in terms of types of pesticide used, i.e. adopters use safer pesticides based on World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The third-stage structural revenue model results demonstrate that adoption of standards has a positive and significant impact on revenue raised in vegetable production. Nevertheless, farmers producing for the export market are indistinguishable from those producing for the domestic farmers in terms of the total revenue earned from producing vegetables during the rainy season, on a 'per acre' basis. Although standards can potentially prevent resource-poor smallholders from maintaining their position in the lucrative export markets, they can also result in positive changes in the production systems of those small-scale farmers who adopt it, as shown by these results.

AB - This article provides an empirical analysis of the impact of European Union (EU) private food safety standards on pesticide use and farm-level productivity among small-scale vegetable producers in Kenya. We apply an extended three-stage damage control production framework, accounting for multiple endogeneity problems, to farm-level data collected from a random cross-sectional sample of 539 small-scale producers. Estimation results show that farmers producing vegetables for the domestic market use significantly lower quantities of pesticides than do export farmers. However, contrary to findings elsewhere, the econometric evidence here shows that both domestic and export-oriented vegetable farmers in Kenya use pesticides at levels below the economic optimum. The results also show that the adoption of standards by export farmers does not have any significant impact on total pesticide use. However, adopter categories are distinguishable in terms of types of pesticide used, i.e. adopters use safer pesticides based on World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The third-stage structural revenue model results demonstrate that adoption of standards has a positive and significant impact on revenue raised in vegetable production. Nevertheless, farmers producing for the export market are indistinguishable from those producing for the domestic farmers in terms of the total revenue earned from producing vegetables during the rainy season, on a 'per acre' basis. Although standards can potentially prevent resource-poor smallholders from maintaining their position in the lucrative export markets, they can also result in positive changes in the production systems of those small-scale farmers who adopt it, as shown by these results.

KW - Damage control

KW - Food safety standards

KW - High-value crops

KW - Kenya

KW - Productivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68949155467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2009.00205.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2009.00205.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:68949155467

VL - 60

SP - 645

EP - 667

JO - Journal of agricultural economics

JF - Journal of agricultural economics

SN - 0021-857X

IS - 3

ER -