Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 612-626 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Hydrological processes |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 13 Oct 2016 |
Publication status | Published - 30 Jan 2017 |
Abstract
Regionalization methods have been effectively used in many hydrological studies, such as regional flood frequency analysis and low flows. However, there is no study to estimate the instantaneous peak flow (IPF) from maximum mean daily flow (MDF) using hydrological models with regionalized parameters. In this paper, the semidistributed conceptual hydrological model Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning is operated on a daily time step for 18 catchments in the Aller-Leine basin, Germany. The model is calibrated on four different flow statistics, including winter/summer extremes distribution and flow duration curves. The model parameter values are predefined with the associated catchment descriptors by a transfer function. Two different regionalization schemes are investigated: one is carried out for all the catchments in the study area; the other one is only performed for several catchments within a cluster. The k-means algorithm is used to 12 different catchment characteristics from all 18 catchments as the partitional clustering algorithm. Subsequently, the general extreme value distributions are fitted to the modeled MDFs, which are then transferred into IPF quantiles using a multiple regression model. The results show that (a) the uncertainty resulted from model parameter regionalization for the estimation of IPFs is much smaller than the error when using MDFs instead of IPFs; (b) the hydrological responses of the clustered catchments located in the flat areas are, in general, not as homogeneous as the ones in high elevated regions; and (c) the model with the parameters derived from the same regionalization coefficients within a cluster performs better using the corresponding parameters estimated through all the catchments.
Keywords
- hydrological modeling, instantaneous peak flow (IPF), maximum mean daily flow (MDF), regionalization
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Science(all)
- Water Science and Technology
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Hydrological processes, Vol. 31, No. 3, 30.01.2017, p. 612-626.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimation of instantaneous peak flow from maximum mean daily flow by regionalization of catchment model parameters
AU - Ding, Jie
AU - Haberlandt, Uwe
N1 - Funding information: The authors thank their colleagues for their valuable comments and suggestions. We are also grateful for the right to use data from the German National Weather Service (DWD), NLWKN Niedersachsen, Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landentwicklung Niedersachsen, Landesamt für Bergbau, and the funding from the China Scholarship Council (CSC).
PY - 2017/1/30
Y1 - 2017/1/30
N2 - Regionalization methods have been effectively used in many hydrological studies, such as regional flood frequency analysis and low flows. However, there is no study to estimate the instantaneous peak flow (IPF) from maximum mean daily flow (MDF) using hydrological models with regionalized parameters. In this paper, the semidistributed conceptual hydrological model Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning is operated on a daily time step for 18 catchments in the Aller-Leine basin, Germany. The model is calibrated on four different flow statistics, including winter/summer extremes distribution and flow duration curves. The model parameter values are predefined with the associated catchment descriptors by a transfer function. Two different regionalization schemes are investigated: one is carried out for all the catchments in the study area; the other one is only performed for several catchments within a cluster. The k-means algorithm is used to 12 different catchment characteristics from all 18 catchments as the partitional clustering algorithm. Subsequently, the general extreme value distributions are fitted to the modeled MDFs, which are then transferred into IPF quantiles using a multiple regression model. The results show that (a) the uncertainty resulted from model parameter regionalization for the estimation of IPFs is much smaller than the error when using MDFs instead of IPFs; (b) the hydrological responses of the clustered catchments located in the flat areas are, in general, not as homogeneous as the ones in high elevated regions; and (c) the model with the parameters derived from the same regionalization coefficients within a cluster performs better using the corresponding parameters estimated through all the catchments.
AB - Regionalization methods have been effectively used in many hydrological studies, such as regional flood frequency analysis and low flows. However, there is no study to estimate the instantaneous peak flow (IPF) from maximum mean daily flow (MDF) using hydrological models with regionalized parameters. In this paper, the semidistributed conceptual hydrological model Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning is operated on a daily time step for 18 catchments in the Aller-Leine basin, Germany. The model is calibrated on four different flow statistics, including winter/summer extremes distribution and flow duration curves. The model parameter values are predefined with the associated catchment descriptors by a transfer function. Two different regionalization schemes are investigated: one is carried out for all the catchments in the study area; the other one is only performed for several catchments within a cluster. The k-means algorithm is used to 12 different catchment characteristics from all 18 catchments as the partitional clustering algorithm. Subsequently, the general extreme value distributions are fitted to the modeled MDFs, which are then transferred into IPF quantiles using a multiple regression model. The results show that (a) the uncertainty resulted from model parameter regionalization for the estimation of IPFs is much smaller than the error when using MDFs instead of IPFs; (b) the hydrological responses of the clustered catchments located in the flat areas are, in general, not as homogeneous as the ones in high elevated regions; and (c) the model with the parameters derived from the same regionalization coefficients within a cluster performs better using the corresponding parameters estimated through all the catchments.
KW - hydrological modeling
KW - instantaneous peak flow (IPF)
KW - maximum mean daily flow (MDF)
KW - regionalization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006357099&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/hyp.11053
DO - 10.1002/hyp.11053
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85006357099
VL - 31
SP - 612
EP - 626
JO - Hydrological processes
JF - Hydrological processes
SN - 0885-6087
IS - 3
ER -