Equal Access to Outreach Mental Health Care? Exploring how the Place of Residence influences the Use of Intensive Home Treatment in a Rural Catchment Area in Germany

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • J. Schwarz
  • J. Hemmerling
  • N. Kabisch
  • L. Galbusera
  • M. Heinze
  • S. von Peter
  • J. Wolff

External Research Organisations

  • Brandenburg Medical School Theodor-Fontane
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (HU Berlin)
  • Technische Universität Braunschweig
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number826
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Volume22
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 26 Dec 2022

Abstract

Background: Internationally, intensive psychiatric home treatment has been increasingly implemented as a community-based alternative to inpatient admission. Since 2018, the so-called Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT; German: "Stationsäquivalente Behandlung", short: "StäB") has been introduced as a particularly intensive form of home treatment that provides at least one daily treatment contact in the service users’ (SU) home environment. Prior research shows that this can be challenging in rural catchment areas. Our paper investigates to which extent the location of the SU home location within the catchment area as well as the distance between the home and the clinic influence the utilisation of inpatient treatment compared to IEHT. Method: Routine data of one psychiatric hospital in the federal state of Brandenburg in Germany were analysed for the observational period 07/2018–06/2021. Two comparison groups were formed: SU receiving inpatient treatment and SU receiving IEHT. The SU places of residence were respectively anonymised and converted into geo-coordinates. A geographic information system (GIS) was used to visualise the places of residence, and car travel distances as well as travel times to the clinic were determined. Spatial analyses were performed to show the differences between comparison groups. In a more in-depth analysis, the proximity of SU residences to each other was examined as an indicator of possible clustering. Results: During the observational period, the location of 687 inpatient and 140 IEHT unique SU were mapped using the GIS. SU receiving treatment resided predominantly within the catchment area, and this proportion was slightly higher for SU receiving IEHT than for those treated in inpatient setting (95.3% vs. 84.7%). In the catchment area, the geographical distribution of SU place of residence was similar in the two groups. There was a general higher service provision in the more densely populated communities close to Berlin. SU with residence in peripheral communities were mainly treated within the inpatient setting. The mean travel times and distances to the place of residence only differed minimally between the two groups of SU (p > 0.05). The places of residence of SU treated with IEHT were located in greater proximity to each other than those of SU treated in inpatient setting (p < 0.1). Conclusion: In especially peripheral parts of the examined catchment area, it may be more difficult to have access to IEHT rather than to inpatient services. The results raise questions regarding health equity and the planning of health care services and have important implications for the further development of intensive home treatment. Telehealth interventions such as blended-care approaches and an increase of flexibility in treatment intensity, e.g. eliminating the daily visit requirement, could ease the implementation of intensive home treatment especially in rural areas.

Keywords

    Crisis resolution teams, Geography, Health care access, Health care planning, Health equity, Home-treatment, Mental health services, Outreach care, Spatial analysis, Stationsäquivalente Behandlung, StäB

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Equal Access to Outreach Mental Health Care? Exploring how the Place of Residence influences the Use of Intensive Home Treatment in a Rural Catchment Area in Germany. / Schwarz, J.; Hemmerling, J.; Kabisch, N. et al.
In: BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 22, No. 1, 826, 26.12.2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{e8fc16dea36d45e8924a204023775c7a,
title = "Equal Access to Outreach Mental Health Care?: Exploring how the Place of Residence influences the Use of Intensive Home Treatment in a Rural Catchment Area in Germany",
abstract = "Background: Internationally, intensive psychiatric home treatment has been increasingly implemented as a community-based alternative to inpatient admission. Since 2018, the so-called Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT; German: {"}Stations{\"a}quivalente Behandlung{"}, short: {"}St{\"a}B{"}) has been introduced as a particularly intensive form of home treatment that provides at least one daily treatment contact in the service users{\textquoteright} (SU) home environment. Prior research shows that this can be challenging in rural catchment areas. Our paper investigates to which extent the location of the SU home location within the catchment area as well as the distance between the home and the clinic influence the utilisation of inpatient treatment compared to IEHT. Method: Routine data of one psychiatric hospital in the federal state of Brandenburg in Germany were analysed for the observational period 07/2018–06/2021. Two comparison groups were formed: SU receiving inpatient treatment and SU receiving IEHT. The SU places of residence were respectively anonymised and converted into geo-coordinates. A geographic information system (GIS) was used to visualise the places of residence, and car travel distances as well as travel times to the clinic were determined. Spatial analyses were performed to show the differences between comparison groups. In a more in-depth analysis, the proximity of SU residences to each other was examined as an indicator of possible clustering. Results: During the observational period, the location of 687 inpatient and 140 IEHT unique SU were mapped using the GIS. SU receiving treatment resided predominantly within the catchment area, and this proportion was slightly higher for SU receiving IEHT than for those treated in inpatient setting (95.3% vs. 84.7%). In the catchment area, the geographical distribution of SU place of residence was similar in the two groups. There was a general higher service provision in the more densely populated communities close to Berlin. SU with residence in peripheral communities were mainly treated within the inpatient setting. The mean travel times and distances to the place of residence only differed minimally between the two groups of SU (p > 0.05). The places of residence of SU treated with IEHT were located in greater proximity to each other than those of SU treated in inpatient setting (p < 0.1). Conclusion: In especially peripheral parts of the examined catchment area, it may be more difficult to have access to IEHT rather than to inpatient services. The results raise questions regarding health equity and the planning of health care services and have important implications for the further development of intensive home treatment. Telehealth interventions such as blended-care approaches and an increase of flexibility in treatment intensity, e.g. eliminating the daily visit requirement, could ease the implementation of intensive home treatment especially in rural areas.",
keywords = "Crisis resolution teams, Geography, Health care access, Health care planning, Health equity, Home-treatment, Mental health services, Outreach care, Spatial analysis, Stations{\"a}quivalente Behandlung, St{\"a}B",
author = "J. Schwarz and J. Hemmerling and N. Kabisch and L. Galbusera and M. Heinze and {von Peter}, S. and J. Wolff",
note = "Funding Information: Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Funded by the publication fund of Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), supported by the Springer DEAL agreement.",
year = "2022",
month = dec,
day = "26",
doi = "10.1186/s12888-022-04477-y",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
journal = "BMC Psychiatry",
issn = "1471-244X",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equal Access to Outreach Mental Health Care?

T2 - Exploring how the Place of Residence influences the Use of Intensive Home Treatment in a Rural Catchment Area in Germany

AU - Schwarz, J.

AU - Hemmerling, J.

AU - Kabisch, N.

AU - Galbusera, L.

AU - Heinze, M.

AU - von Peter, S.

AU - Wolff, J.

N1 - Funding Information: Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Funded by the publication fund of Brandenburg Medical School (MHB), supported by the Springer DEAL agreement.

PY - 2022/12/26

Y1 - 2022/12/26

N2 - Background: Internationally, intensive psychiatric home treatment has been increasingly implemented as a community-based alternative to inpatient admission. Since 2018, the so-called Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT; German: "Stationsäquivalente Behandlung", short: "StäB") has been introduced as a particularly intensive form of home treatment that provides at least one daily treatment contact in the service users’ (SU) home environment. Prior research shows that this can be challenging in rural catchment areas. Our paper investigates to which extent the location of the SU home location within the catchment area as well as the distance between the home and the clinic influence the utilisation of inpatient treatment compared to IEHT. Method: Routine data of one psychiatric hospital in the federal state of Brandenburg in Germany were analysed for the observational period 07/2018–06/2021. Two comparison groups were formed: SU receiving inpatient treatment and SU receiving IEHT. The SU places of residence were respectively anonymised and converted into geo-coordinates. A geographic information system (GIS) was used to visualise the places of residence, and car travel distances as well as travel times to the clinic were determined. Spatial analyses were performed to show the differences between comparison groups. In a more in-depth analysis, the proximity of SU residences to each other was examined as an indicator of possible clustering. Results: During the observational period, the location of 687 inpatient and 140 IEHT unique SU were mapped using the GIS. SU receiving treatment resided predominantly within the catchment area, and this proportion was slightly higher for SU receiving IEHT than for those treated in inpatient setting (95.3% vs. 84.7%). In the catchment area, the geographical distribution of SU place of residence was similar in the two groups. There was a general higher service provision in the more densely populated communities close to Berlin. SU with residence in peripheral communities were mainly treated within the inpatient setting. The mean travel times and distances to the place of residence only differed minimally between the two groups of SU (p > 0.05). The places of residence of SU treated with IEHT were located in greater proximity to each other than those of SU treated in inpatient setting (p < 0.1). Conclusion: In especially peripheral parts of the examined catchment area, it may be more difficult to have access to IEHT rather than to inpatient services. The results raise questions regarding health equity and the planning of health care services and have important implications for the further development of intensive home treatment. Telehealth interventions such as blended-care approaches and an increase of flexibility in treatment intensity, e.g. eliminating the daily visit requirement, could ease the implementation of intensive home treatment especially in rural areas.

AB - Background: Internationally, intensive psychiatric home treatment has been increasingly implemented as a community-based alternative to inpatient admission. Since 2018, the so-called Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT; German: "Stationsäquivalente Behandlung", short: "StäB") has been introduced as a particularly intensive form of home treatment that provides at least one daily treatment contact in the service users’ (SU) home environment. Prior research shows that this can be challenging in rural catchment areas. Our paper investigates to which extent the location of the SU home location within the catchment area as well as the distance between the home and the clinic influence the utilisation of inpatient treatment compared to IEHT. Method: Routine data of one psychiatric hospital in the federal state of Brandenburg in Germany were analysed for the observational period 07/2018–06/2021. Two comparison groups were formed: SU receiving inpatient treatment and SU receiving IEHT. The SU places of residence were respectively anonymised and converted into geo-coordinates. A geographic information system (GIS) was used to visualise the places of residence, and car travel distances as well as travel times to the clinic were determined. Spatial analyses were performed to show the differences between comparison groups. In a more in-depth analysis, the proximity of SU residences to each other was examined as an indicator of possible clustering. Results: During the observational period, the location of 687 inpatient and 140 IEHT unique SU were mapped using the GIS. SU receiving treatment resided predominantly within the catchment area, and this proportion was slightly higher for SU receiving IEHT than for those treated in inpatient setting (95.3% vs. 84.7%). In the catchment area, the geographical distribution of SU place of residence was similar in the two groups. There was a general higher service provision in the more densely populated communities close to Berlin. SU with residence in peripheral communities were mainly treated within the inpatient setting. The mean travel times and distances to the place of residence only differed minimally between the two groups of SU (p > 0.05). The places of residence of SU treated with IEHT were located in greater proximity to each other than those of SU treated in inpatient setting (p < 0.1). Conclusion: In especially peripheral parts of the examined catchment area, it may be more difficult to have access to IEHT rather than to inpatient services. The results raise questions regarding health equity and the planning of health care services and have important implications for the further development of intensive home treatment. Telehealth interventions such as blended-care approaches and an increase of flexibility in treatment intensity, e.g. eliminating the daily visit requirement, could ease the implementation of intensive home treatment especially in rural areas.

KW - Crisis resolution teams

KW - Geography

KW - Health care access

KW - Health care planning

KW - Health equity

KW - Home-treatment

KW - Mental health services

KW - Outreach care

KW - Spatial analysis

KW - Stationsäquivalente Behandlung

KW - StäB

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144637461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12888-022-04477-y

DO - 10.1186/s12888-022-04477-y

M3 - Conference article

VL - 22

JO - BMC Psychiatry

JF - BMC Psychiatry

SN - 1471-244X

IS - 1

M1 - 826

ER -

By the same author(s)