Engineering quantification of inconsistent information

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • National University of Singapore
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)174-200
Number of pages27
JournalInternational Journal of Reliability and Safety
Volume3
Issue number1-3
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

In this paper, the specification of fuzzy random quantities is considered for selected cases of problematic information as it appears frequently in engineering practice. The problem of inconsistency regarding uncertainty and imprecision is addressed. Quantification strategies are proposed for the following cases: (i) samples of small size (ii) samples with imprecise elements and (iii) samples obtained under inconsistent environmental conditions. Typical expert knowledge is included in the considerations. For solution, traditional statistical methods are combined with non-stochastic models for dealing with imprecision. Statistical uncertainty and imprecision are reflected separately in the quantification results. The entire range of possible stochastic models is covered and can be forwarded to a structural analysis and reliability assessment. This provides valuable information for subsequent decision-making. The risk of deriving wrong decisions due to biased or narrowed uncertainty quantification can be reduced significantly. The proposed quantification strategies are demonstrated by way of numerical examples.

Keywords

    Fuzzy methods, Fuzzy probabilities, Imprecise data, Inconsistent data, Reliability assessment, Uncertain structural analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Engineering quantification of inconsistent information. / Beer, Michael.
In: International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Vol. 3, No. 1-3, 2009, p. 174-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Beer, M 2009, 'Engineering quantification of inconsistent information', International Journal of Reliability and Safety, vol. 3, no. 1-3, pp. 174-200. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRS.2009.026840
Beer, M. (2009). Engineering quantification of inconsistent information. International Journal of Reliability and Safety, 3(1-3), 174-200. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRS.2009.026840
Beer M. Engineering quantification of inconsistent information. International Journal of Reliability and Safety. 2009;3(1-3):174-200. doi: 10.1504/IJRS.2009.026840
Beer, Michael. / Engineering quantification of inconsistent information. In: International Journal of Reliability and Safety. 2009 ; Vol. 3, No. 1-3. pp. 174-200.
Download
@article{3a6267350c8f413595f906dac11c6d6e,
title = "Engineering quantification of inconsistent information",
abstract = "In this paper, the specification of fuzzy random quantities is considered for selected cases of problematic information as it appears frequently in engineering practice. The problem of inconsistency regarding uncertainty and imprecision is addressed. Quantification strategies are proposed for the following cases: (i) samples of small size (ii) samples with imprecise elements and (iii) samples obtained under inconsistent environmental conditions. Typical expert knowledge is included in the considerations. For solution, traditional statistical methods are combined with non-stochastic models for dealing with imprecision. Statistical uncertainty and imprecision are reflected separately in the quantification results. The entire range of possible stochastic models is covered and can be forwarded to a structural analysis and reliability assessment. This provides valuable information for subsequent decision-making. The risk of deriving wrong decisions due to biased or narrowed uncertainty quantification can be reduced significantly. The proposed quantification strategies are demonstrated by way of numerical examples.",
keywords = "Fuzzy methods, Fuzzy probabilities, Imprecise data, Inconsistent data, Reliability assessment, Uncertain structural analysis",
author = "Michael Beer",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1504/IJRS.2009.026840",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "174--200",
number = "1-3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Engineering quantification of inconsistent information

AU - Beer, Michael

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - In this paper, the specification of fuzzy random quantities is considered for selected cases of problematic information as it appears frequently in engineering practice. The problem of inconsistency regarding uncertainty and imprecision is addressed. Quantification strategies are proposed for the following cases: (i) samples of small size (ii) samples with imprecise elements and (iii) samples obtained under inconsistent environmental conditions. Typical expert knowledge is included in the considerations. For solution, traditional statistical methods are combined with non-stochastic models for dealing with imprecision. Statistical uncertainty and imprecision are reflected separately in the quantification results. The entire range of possible stochastic models is covered and can be forwarded to a structural analysis and reliability assessment. This provides valuable information for subsequent decision-making. The risk of deriving wrong decisions due to biased or narrowed uncertainty quantification can be reduced significantly. The proposed quantification strategies are demonstrated by way of numerical examples.

AB - In this paper, the specification of fuzzy random quantities is considered for selected cases of problematic information as it appears frequently in engineering practice. The problem of inconsistency regarding uncertainty and imprecision is addressed. Quantification strategies are proposed for the following cases: (i) samples of small size (ii) samples with imprecise elements and (iii) samples obtained under inconsistent environmental conditions. Typical expert knowledge is included in the considerations. For solution, traditional statistical methods are combined with non-stochastic models for dealing with imprecision. Statistical uncertainty and imprecision are reflected separately in the quantification results. The entire range of possible stochastic models is covered and can be forwarded to a structural analysis and reliability assessment. This provides valuable information for subsequent decision-making. The risk of deriving wrong decisions due to biased or narrowed uncertainty quantification can be reduced significantly. The proposed quantification strategies are demonstrated by way of numerical examples.

KW - Fuzzy methods

KW - Fuzzy probabilities

KW - Imprecise data

KW - Inconsistent data

KW - Reliability assessment

KW - Uncertain structural analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957357107&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1504/IJRS.2009.026840

DO - 10.1504/IJRS.2009.026840

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77957357107

VL - 3

SP - 174

EP - 200

JO - International Journal of Reliability and Safety

JF - International Journal of Reliability and Safety

SN - 1479-389X

IS - 1-3

ER -

By the same author(s)