Energetic evaluation of high pressure PEM electrolyzer systems for intermediate storage of renewable energies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems
  • Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)570-580
Number of pages11
JournalElectrochimica acta
Volume110
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Three pathways for high pressure hydrogen production by means of water electrolysis are energetically compared. Besides the two classic paths, comprising either the pressurization of the product gas (path I) or the mechanical pressurization of the feed water (path II), a third path is discussed. It involves the electrochemical co-compression during the electrolysis. The energetic evaluation is based on a uniform model description of the different hydrogen production pathways. It consists of integral, steady-state balances for energy, entropy and mass as well as a modern equation of state. From this the reversible energy demand is used to identify the inherent thermodynamic drawbacks of the pathways. The additional consideration of irreversibilities allows for the determination of efficiency losses due to device specific characteristics. For hydrogen delivery pressures of up to 40 bar the classical pathways are out-performed by path III. Since the hydrogen is already produced at elevated pressure this eliminates the need for an energy consuming mechanical hydrogen compression and spares the additional energy demand due to the oxygen pressurization. However, with increasing pressure differences the hydrogen back-diffusion strongly decreases the Faradaic efficiency of the asymmetric electrolyzer that has to be compensated by an additional energy supply.

Keywords

    Storage of renewable energy, Sustainable hydrogen production, Water electrolysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Energetic evaluation of high pressure PEM electrolyzer systems for intermediate storage of renewable energies. / Bensmann, B.; Hanke-Rauschenbach, R.; Peña Arias, I. K. et al.
In: Electrochimica acta, Vol. 110, 2013, p. 570-580.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Bensmann B, Hanke-Rauschenbach R, Peña Arias IK, Sundmacher K. Energetic evaluation of high pressure PEM electrolyzer systems for intermediate storage of renewable energies. Electrochimica acta. 2013;110:570-580. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.102
Download
@article{357f0bc221dc4dab93ae95eb5d831177,
title = "Energetic evaluation of high pressure PEM electrolyzer systems for intermediate storage of renewable energies",
abstract = "Three pathways for high pressure hydrogen production by means of water electrolysis are energetically compared. Besides the two classic paths, comprising either the pressurization of the product gas (path I) or the mechanical pressurization of the feed water (path II), a third path is discussed. It involves the electrochemical co-compression during the electrolysis. The energetic evaluation is based on a uniform model description of the different hydrogen production pathways. It consists of integral, steady-state balances for energy, entropy and mass as well as a modern equation of state. From this the reversible energy demand is used to identify the inherent thermodynamic drawbacks of the pathways. The additional consideration of irreversibilities allows for the determination of efficiency losses due to device specific characteristics. For hydrogen delivery pressures of up to 40 bar the classical pathways are out-performed by path III. Since the hydrogen is already produced at elevated pressure this eliminates the need for an energy consuming mechanical hydrogen compression and spares the additional energy demand due to the oxygen pressurization. However, with increasing pressure differences the hydrogen back-diffusion strongly decreases the Faradaic efficiency of the asymmetric electrolyzer that has to be compensated by an additional energy supply.",
keywords = "Storage of renewable energy, Sustainable hydrogen production, Water electrolysis, Storage of renewable energy, Sustainable hydrogen production, Water electrolysis",
author = "B. Bensmann and R. Hanke-Rauschenbach and {Pe{\~n}a Arias}, {I. K.} and K. Sundmacher",
note = "Copyright: Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.102",
language = "English",
volume = "110",
pages = "570--580",
journal = "Electrochimica acta",
issn = "0013-4686",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energetic evaluation of high pressure PEM electrolyzer systems for intermediate storage of renewable energies

AU - Bensmann, B.

AU - Hanke-Rauschenbach, R.

AU - Peña Arias, I. K.

AU - Sundmacher, K.

N1 - Copyright: Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Three pathways for high pressure hydrogen production by means of water electrolysis are energetically compared. Besides the two classic paths, comprising either the pressurization of the product gas (path I) or the mechanical pressurization of the feed water (path II), a third path is discussed. It involves the electrochemical co-compression during the electrolysis. The energetic evaluation is based on a uniform model description of the different hydrogen production pathways. It consists of integral, steady-state balances for energy, entropy and mass as well as a modern equation of state. From this the reversible energy demand is used to identify the inherent thermodynamic drawbacks of the pathways. The additional consideration of irreversibilities allows for the determination of efficiency losses due to device specific characteristics. For hydrogen delivery pressures of up to 40 bar the classical pathways are out-performed by path III. Since the hydrogen is already produced at elevated pressure this eliminates the need for an energy consuming mechanical hydrogen compression and spares the additional energy demand due to the oxygen pressurization. However, with increasing pressure differences the hydrogen back-diffusion strongly decreases the Faradaic efficiency of the asymmetric electrolyzer that has to be compensated by an additional energy supply.

AB - Three pathways for high pressure hydrogen production by means of water electrolysis are energetically compared. Besides the two classic paths, comprising either the pressurization of the product gas (path I) or the mechanical pressurization of the feed water (path II), a third path is discussed. It involves the electrochemical co-compression during the electrolysis. The energetic evaluation is based on a uniform model description of the different hydrogen production pathways. It consists of integral, steady-state balances for energy, entropy and mass as well as a modern equation of state. From this the reversible energy demand is used to identify the inherent thermodynamic drawbacks of the pathways. The additional consideration of irreversibilities allows for the determination of efficiency losses due to device specific characteristics. For hydrogen delivery pressures of up to 40 bar the classical pathways are out-performed by path III. Since the hydrogen is already produced at elevated pressure this eliminates the need for an energy consuming mechanical hydrogen compression and spares the additional energy demand due to the oxygen pressurization. However, with increasing pressure differences the hydrogen back-diffusion strongly decreases the Faradaic efficiency of the asymmetric electrolyzer that has to be compensated by an additional energy supply.

KW - Storage of renewable energy

KW - Sustainable hydrogen production

KW - Water electrolysis

KW - Storage of renewable energy

KW - Sustainable hydrogen production

KW - Water electrolysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888365308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.102

DO - 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.102

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84888365308

VL - 110

SP - 570

EP - 580

JO - Electrochimica acta

JF - Electrochimica acta

SN - 0013-4686

ER -

By the same author(s)