Electrical energy storage for industrial grid fee reduction: A large scale analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • VEA Federal Union of Energy Consumers
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number112539
JournalEnergy conversion and management
Volume208
Early online date19 Feb 2020
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2020

Abstract

While grid fees have a major impact on energy costs of large consumers, they can be reduced via peak shaving using electrical energy storages, like lithium ion, lead acid, or redox flow batteries. Especially in Germany, there are further options, namely making use of intensive and atypical grid usage, to reduce the regular grid fee. In the present analysis, we examined load profiles of more than 5,300 company sites and checked under which circumstances electrical energy storage can be profitably applied to reduce the grid fee in the three mentioned ways. Here, the calculation of each company specific grid fee was performed compliant to the German regulatory scheme with fixed power- and energy-dependent prices as well as considering the actual prices charged by the connected grid operators. The analysis showed, that the power price for grid usage as well as the investment costs for energy storages are most important for the profitability of general peak shaving, while the concrete shape of the load profile determines the capacity with the shortest payback period. The intensive grid usage is the most promising revenue model, if the formal requirements are met. The atypical grid usage is the second most profitable approach. In most cases, lithium ion storages were most cost-effective, compared to lead acid and redox flow batteries. A future reduction of storage investment costs will lead to an increase of profitable projects especially concerning the individual grid fees. For the general grid fee, a massive price reduction of more than 50 % is necessary to achieve payback periods of less than five years for a noteworthy number of company sites.

Keywords

    Battery, Electrical energy storage, Grid fee, Peak shaving

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Electrical energy storage for industrial grid fee reduction: A large scale analysis. / Tiemann, Paul Hendrik; Bensmann, Astrid; Stuke, Volker et al.
In: Energy conversion and management, Vol. 208, 112539, 15.03.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Tiemann PH, Bensmann A, Stuke V, Hanke-Rauschenbach R. Electrical energy storage for industrial grid fee reduction: A large scale analysis. Energy conversion and management. 2020 Mar 15;208:112539. Epub 2020 Feb 19. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112539
Tiemann, Paul Hendrik ; Bensmann, Astrid ; Stuke, Volker et al. / Electrical energy storage for industrial grid fee reduction : A large scale analysis. In: Energy conversion and management. 2020 ; Vol. 208.
Download
@article{2f90b30566114afcbbf6b1c3bcbfad4d,
title = "Electrical energy storage for industrial grid fee reduction: A large scale analysis",
abstract = "While grid fees have a major impact on energy costs of large consumers, they can be reduced via peak shaving using electrical energy storages, like lithium ion, lead acid, or redox flow batteries. Especially in Germany, there are further options, namely making use of intensive and atypical grid usage, to reduce the regular grid fee. In the present analysis, we examined load profiles of more than 5,300 company sites and checked under which circumstances electrical energy storage can be profitably applied to reduce the grid fee in the three mentioned ways. Here, the calculation of each company specific grid fee was performed compliant to the German regulatory scheme with fixed power- and energy-dependent prices as well as considering the actual prices charged by the connected grid operators. The analysis showed, that the power price for grid usage as well as the investment costs for energy storages are most important for the profitability of general peak shaving, while the concrete shape of the load profile determines the capacity with the shortest payback period. The intensive grid usage is the most promising revenue model, if the formal requirements are met. The atypical grid usage is the second most profitable approach. In most cases, lithium ion storages were most cost-effective, compared to lead acid and redox flow batteries. A future reduction of storage investment costs will lead to an increase of profitable projects especially concerning the individual grid fees. For the general grid fee, a massive price reduction of more than 50 % is necessary to achieve payback periods of less than five years for a noteworthy number of company sites.",
keywords = "Battery, Electrical energy storage, Grid fee, Peak shaving",
author = "Tiemann, {Paul Hendrik} and Astrid Bensmann and Volker Stuke and Richard Hanke-Rauschenbach",
note = "Funding Information: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.",
year = "2020",
month = mar,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112539",
language = "English",
volume = "208",
journal = "Energy conversion and management",
issn = "0196-8904",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrical energy storage for industrial grid fee reduction

T2 - A large scale analysis

AU - Tiemann, Paul Hendrik

AU - Bensmann, Astrid

AU - Stuke, Volker

AU - Hanke-Rauschenbach, Richard

N1 - Funding Information: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

PY - 2020/3/15

Y1 - 2020/3/15

N2 - While grid fees have a major impact on energy costs of large consumers, they can be reduced via peak shaving using electrical energy storages, like lithium ion, lead acid, or redox flow batteries. Especially in Germany, there are further options, namely making use of intensive and atypical grid usage, to reduce the regular grid fee. In the present analysis, we examined load profiles of more than 5,300 company sites and checked under which circumstances electrical energy storage can be profitably applied to reduce the grid fee in the three mentioned ways. Here, the calculation of each company specific grid fee was performed compliant to the German regulatory scheme with fixed power- and energy-dependent prices as well as considering the actual prices charged by the connected grid operators. The analysis showed, that the power price for grid usage as well as the investment costs for energy storages are most important for the profitability of general peak shaving, while the concrete shape of the load profile determines the capacity with the shortest payback period. The intensive grid usage is the most promising revenue model, if the formal requirements are met. The atypical grid usage is the second most profitable approach. In most cases, lithium ion storages were most cost-effective, compared to lead acid and redox flow batteries. A future reduction of storage investment costs will lead to an increase of profitable projects especially concerning the individual grid fees. For the general grid fee, a massive price reduction of more than 50 % is necessary to achieve payback periods of less than five years for a noteworthy number of company sites.

AB - While grid fees have a major impact on energy costs of large consumers, they can be reduced via peak shaving using electrical energy storages, like lithium ion, lead acid, or redox flow batteries. Especially in Germany, there are further options, namely making use of intensive and atypical grid usage, to reduce the regular grid fee. In the present analysis, we examined load profiles of more than 5,300 company sites and checked under which circumstances electrical energy storage can be profitably applied to reduce the grid fee in the three mentioned ways. Here, the calculation of each company specific grid fee was performed compliant to the German regulatory scheme with fixed power- and energy-dependent prices as well as considering the actual prices charged by the connected grid operators. The analysis showed, that the power price for grid usage as well as the investment costs for energy storages are most important for the profitability of general peak shaving, while the concrete shape of the load profile determines the capacity with the shortest payback period. The intensive grid usage is the most promising revenue model, if the formal requirements are met. The atypical grid usage is the second most profitable approach. In most cases, lithium ion storages were most cost-effective, compared to lead acid and redox flow batteries. A future reduction of storage investment costs will lead to an increase of profitable projects especially concerning the individual grid fees. For the general grid fee, a massive price reduction of more than 50 % is necessary to achieve payback periods of less than five years for a noteworthy number of company sites.

KW - Battery

KW - Electrical energy storage

KW - Grid fee

KW - Peak shaving

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079553762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112539

DO - 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112539

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85079553762

VL - 208

JO - Energy conversion and management

JF - Energy conversion and management

SN - 0196-8904

M1 - 112539

ER -

By the same author(s)