Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 119731 |
| Journal | Journal of cleaner production |
| Volume | 251 |
| Early online date | 16 Dec 2019 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2020 |
Abstract
The manufacturing sector consumes a significant amount of energy and their outputs, like solid and gaseous waste streams, can result in substantial stress on the environment. This paper aims to analyze and compare the electrical energy and material efficiency of machining, additive and hybrid manufacturing. The analysis of the manufacturing processes is based on machine tool data from a sample process. To get a generalized statement about the energy consumption of the investigated processes the electrical energy demand was extrapolated as a function of the material removal ratio. The results indicate that hybrid manufacturing becomes beneficial from an environmental point of view compared to milling, when the material removal ratio exceeds 55%. The electrical break-even point for selective laser melting is approximated to 82% material removal ratio from data extrapolation. Subsequently, opportunities for electrical energy and material efficiency improvements are presented for these technologies to gain an understanding of how each can contribute to a more sustainable manufacturing landscape.
Keywords
- Additive manufacturing, Energy efficiency, Hybrid manufacturing, Material efficiency, Milling
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Science(all)
- Engineering(all)
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Energy(all)
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Business, Management and Accounting(all)
- Strategy and Management
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Journal of cleaner production, Vol. 251, 119731, 01.04.2020.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrical energy and material efficiency analysis of machining, additive and hybrid manufacturing
AU - Wippermann, A.
AU - Gutowski, T.g.
AU - Denkena, B.
AU - Dittrich, M.-a.
AU - Wessarges, Y.
N1 - Funding Information: The authors would like to thank the company DMG MORI AG for the possibility to perform the measurements on the hybrid machine tool DMG MORI Lasertec 65 3D.
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - The manufacturing sector consumes a significant amount of energy and their outputs, like solid and gaseous waste streams, can result in substantial stress on the environment. This paper aims to analyze and compare the electrical energy and material efficiency of machining, additive and hybrid manufacturing. The analysis of the manufacturing processes is based on machine tool data from a sample process. To get a generalized statement about the energy consumption of the investigated processes the electrical energy demand was extrapolated as a function of the material removal ratio. The results indicate that hybrid manufacturing becomes beneficial from an environmental point of view compared to milling, when the material removal ratio exceeds 55%. The electrical break-even point for selective laser melting is approximated to 82% material removal ratio from data extrapolation. Subsequently, opportunities for electrical energy and material efficiency improvements are presented for these technologies to gain an understanding of how each can contribute to a more sustainable manufacturing landscape.
AB - The manufacturing sector consumes a significant amount of energy and their outputs, like solid and gaseous waste streams, can result in substantial stress on the environment. This paper aims to analyze and compare the electrical energy and material efficiency of machining, additive and hybrid manufacturing. The analysis of the manufacturing processes is based on machine tool data from a sample process. To get a generalized statement about the energy consumption of the investigated processes the electrical energy demand was extrapolated as a function of the material removal ratio. The results indicate that hybrid manufacturing becomes beneficial from an environmental point of view compared to milling, when the material removal ratio exceeds 55%. The electrical break-even point for selective laser melting is approximated to 82% material removal ratio from data extrapolation. Subsequently, opportunities for electrical energy and material efficiency improvements are presented for these technologies to gain an understanding of how each can contribute to a more sustainable manufacturing landscape.
KW - Additive manufacturing
KW - Energy efficiency
KW - Hybrid manufacturing
KW - Material efficiency
KW - Milling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076704895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119731
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119731
M3 - Article
VL - 251
JO - Journal of cleaner production
JF - Journal of cleaner production
SN - 0959-6526
M1 - 119731
ER -