Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 107033 |
| Journal | Ultrasonics Sonochemistry |
| Volume | 110 |
| Early online date | 21 Aug 2024 |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2024 |
Abstract
Sonoprocessing (US), as one of the most well-known and widely used green processing techniques, has tremendous benefits to be used in the food industry. The urgent call for global sustainable food production encourages the usage of such techniques more often and effectively. Using ultrasound as a hurdle technology synergistically with other green methods is crucial to improving the efficiency of the protein shift as well as the number of plant-based analog foods (PBAFs) against conventional products. It was revealed that the US has a significant impact when used as an assistant tool with other green technologies rather than being used alone. It increases the protein extraction efficiencies from plant biomasses, improves the techno-functional properties of food compounds, and makes them more applicable for industrial-scale alternative food production in the circular economy. The US aligns well with the objectives outlined in the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and Planetary Boundaries (PBs) framework, demonstrating promising outcomes in life cycle assessment. However, several challenges such as uncontrolled complex matrix effect, free radical formation, uncontrolled microbial growth/germination or off-flavor formation, removal of aromatic compounds, and Maillard reaction, are revealed in an increased number of studies, all of which need to be considered. In addition to a variety of advantages, this review also discusses the drawbacks and limitations of US focusing on PBAF production.
Keywords
- Analog foods, Plant protein, Plant-based, Sonoprocessing, Ultrasound modification
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Science(all)
- Environmental Chemistry
- Chemical Engineering(all)
- Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous)
- Medicine(all)
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
- Physics and Astronomy(all)
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics
- Chemistry(all)
- Organic Chemistry
- Chemistry(all)
- Inorganic Chemistry
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, Vol. 110, 107033, 11.2024.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of sonoprocessing on the quality of plant-based analog foods
T2 - Compatibility to sustainable development goals, drawbacks and limitations
AU - Gultekin Subasi, Busra
AU - Bilgin, Aysenur Betul
AU - Günal-Köroğlu, Deniz
AU - Saricaoglu, Beyza
AU - Haque, Shafiul
AU - Esatbeyoglu, Tuba
AU - Capanoglu, Esra
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Sonoprocessing (US), as one of the most well-known and widely used green processing techniques, has tremendous benefits to be used in the food industry. The urgent call for global sustainable food production encourages the usage of such techniques more often and effectively. Using ultrasound as a hurdle technology synergistically with other green methods is crucial to improving the efficiency of the protein shift as well as the number of plant-based analog foods (PBAFs) against conventional products. It was revealed that the US has a significant impact when used as an assistant tool with other green technologies rather than being used alone. It increases the protein extraction efficiencies from plant biomasses, improves the techno-functional properties of food compounds, and makes them more applicable for industrial-scale alternative food production in the circular economy. The US aligns well with the objectives outlined in the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and Planetary Boundaries (PBs) framework, demonstrating promising outcomes in life cycle assessment. However, several challenges such as uncontrolled complex matrix effect, free radical formation, uncontrolled microbial growth/germination or off-flavor formation, removal of aromatic compounds, and Maillard reaction, are revealed in an increased number of studies, all of which need to be considered. In addition to a variety of advantages, this review also discusses the drawbacks and limitations of US focusing on PBAF production.
AB - Sonoprocessing (US), as one of the most well-known and widely used green processing techniques, has tremendous benefits to be used in the food industry. The urgent call for global sustainable food production encourages the usage of such techniques more often and effectively. Using ultrasound as a hurdle technology synergistically with other green methods is crucial to improving the efficiency of the protein shift as well as the number of plant-based analog foods (PBAFs) against conventional products. It was revealed that the US has a significant impact when used as an assistant tool with other green technologies rather than being used alone. It increases the protein extraction efficiencies from plant biomasses, improves the techno-functional properties of food compounds, and makes them more applicable for industrial-scale alternative food production in the circular economy. The US aligns well with the objectives outlined in the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and Planetary Boundaries (PBs) framework, demonstrating promising outcomes in life cycle assessment. However, several challenges such as uncontrolled complex matrix effect, free radical formation, uncontrolled microbial growth/germination or off-flavor formation, removal of aromatic compounds, and Maillard reaction, are revealed in an increased number of studies, all of which need to be considered. In addition to a variety of advantages, this review also discusses the drawbacks and limitations of US focusing on PBAF production.
KW - Analog foods
KW - Plant protein
KW - Plant-based
KW - Sonoprocessing
KW - Ultrasound modification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203460580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.107033
DO - 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.107033
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85203460580
VL - 110
JO - Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
JF - Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
SN - 1350-4177
M1 - 107033
ER -