Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Kiel University
  • Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-32
Number of pages32
JournalLandscape Online
Volume34
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

The high variety of ecosystem service categorisation systems, assessment frameworks, indicators, quantification methods and spatial localisation approaches allows scientists and decision makers to harness experience, data, methods and tools. On the other hand, this variety of concepts and disagreements among scientists hamper an integration of ecosystem services into contemporary environmental management and decision making. In this article, the current state of the art of ecosystem service science regarding spatial localisation, indication and quantification of multiple ecosystem service supply and demand is reviewed and discussed. Concepts and tables for regulating, provisioning and cultural ecosystem service definitions, distinguishing between ecosystem service potential supply (stocks), flows (real supply) and demands as well as related indicators for quantification are provided. Furthermore, spatial concepts of service providing units, benefitting areas, spatial relations, rivalry, spatial and temporal scales are elaborated. Finally, matrices linking CORINE land cover types to ecosystem service potentials, flows, demands and budget estimates are provided. The matrices show that ecosystem service potentials of landscapes differ from flows, especially for provisioning ecosystem services.

Keywords

    Benefit areas, Ecosystem service matrix, Landscape, Mapping, Providing units

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. / Burkhard, Benjamin; Kandziora, Marion; Hou, Ying et al.
In: Landscape Online, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2014, p. 1-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Burkhard B, Kandziora M, Hou Y, Müller F. Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landscape Online. 2014;34(1):1-32. doi: 10.3097/LO.201434
Burkhard, Benjamin ; Kandziora, Marion ; Hou, Ying et al. / Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. In: Landscape Online. 2014 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 1-32.
Download
@article{44366e5d0f5a48d58579c5a03631d31a,
title = "Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification",
abstract = "The high variety of ecosystem service categorisation systems, assessment frameworks, indicators, quantification methods and spatial localisation approaches allows scientists and decision makers to harness experience, data, methods and tools. On the other hand, this variety of concepts and disagreements among scientists hamper an integration of ecosystem services into contemporary environmental management and decision making. In this article, the current state of the art of ecosystem service science regarding spatial localisation, indication and quantification of multiple ecosystem service supply and demand is reviewed and discussed. Concepts and tables for regulating, provisioning and cultural ecosystem service definitions, distinguishing between ecosystem service potential supply (stocks), flows (real supply) and demands as well as related indicators for quantification are provided. Furthermore, spatial concepts of service providing units, benefitting areas, spatial relations, rivalry, spatial and temporal scales are elaborated. Finally, matrices linking CORINE land cover types to ecosystem service potentials, flows, demands and budget estimates are provided. The matrices show that ecosystem service potentials of landscapes differ from flows, especially for provisioning ecosystem services.",
keywords = "Benefit areas, Ecosystem service matrix, Landscape, Mapping, Providing units",
author = "Benjamin Burkhard and Marion Kandziora and Ying Hou and Felix M{\"u}ller",
note = "Copyright: Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3097/LO.201434",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1--32",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification

AU - Burkhard, Benjamin

AU - Kandziora, Marion

AU - Hou, Ying

AU - Müller, Felix

N1 - Copyright: Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The high variety of ecosystem service categorisation systems, assessment frameworks, indicators, quantification methods and spatial localisation approaches allows scientists and decision makers to harness experience, data, methods and tools. On the other hand, this variety of concepts and disagreements among scientists hamper an integration of ecosystem services into contemporary environmental management and decision making. In this article, the current state of the art of ecosystem service science regarding spatial localisation, indication and quantification of multiple ecosystem service supply and demand is reviewed and discussed. Concepts and tables for regulating, provisioning and cultural ecosystem service definitions, distinguishing between ecosystem service potential supply (stocks), flows (real supply) and demands as well as related indicators for quantification are provided. Furthermore, spatial concepts of service providing units, benefitting areas, spatial relations, rivalry, spatial and temporal scales are elaborated. Finally, matrices linking CORINE land cover types to ecosystem service potentials, flows, demands and budget estimates are provided. The matrices show that ecosystem service potentials of landscapes differ from flows, especially for provisioning ecosystem services.

AB - The high variety of ecosystem service categorisation systems, assessment frameworks, indicators, quantification methods and spatial localisation approaches allows scientists and decision makers to harness experience, data, methods and tools. On the other hand, this variety of concepts and disagreements among scientists hamper an integration of ecosystem services into contemporary environmental management and decision making. In this article, the current state of the art of ecosystem service science regarding spatial localisation, indication and quantification of multiple ecosystem service supply and demand is reviewed and discussed. Concepts and tables for regulating, provisioning and cultural ecosystem service definitions, distinguishing between ecosystem service potential supply (stocks), flows (real supply) and demands as well as related indicators for quantification are provided. Furthermore, spatial concepts of service providing units, benefitting areas, spatial relations, rivalry, spatial and temporal scales are elaborated. Finally, matrices linking CORINE land cover types to ecosystem service potentials, flows, demands and budget estimates are provided. The matrices show that ecosystem service potentials of landscapes differ from flows, especially for provisioning ecosystem services.

KW - Benefit areas

KW - Ecosystem service matrix

KW - Landscape

KW - Mapping

KW - Providing units

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902954806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3097/LO.201434

DO - 10.3097/LO.201434

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84902954806

VL - 34

SP - 1

EP - 32

JO - Landscape Online

JF - Landscape Online

SN - 1865-1542

IS - 1

ER -

By the same author(s)