Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 930 |
Journal | Sustainability (Switzerland) |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 6 |
Publication status | Published - 2 Jun 2017 |
Abstract
In this study, we use the Contingent Valuation (CV) method to estimate households' willingness to pay (WTP) for the aquatic ecosystem health (biodiversity) improvement. This paper extends CV studies by dealing with the endogenous effect of a proxy variable, namely the subjective experience of negative environmental quality changes. The results show that the correction for the endogeneity bias facilitates the efficiency of parameter estimation in the empirical model. The mean WTP per household accounts for around 46.8% (KRW 79.6) of the current water use charge (KRW 170 per cubic meter). The total benefit from conserving the biodiversity is around KRW 198.62 billion. We found several factors that affect households' WTP for fish biodiversity conservation, suggesting the importance of these factors in the formulation of water policies associated with aquatic biodiversity. In addition, the inefficient water management costs should be redistributed to other projects or new programs such as for the fish biodiversity conservation.
Keywords
- Aquatic biodiversity, Benefit calculation, Bivariate probit model, Contingent valuation method, Endogeneity bias, Willingness to pay
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences(all)
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Energy(all)
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Environmental Science(all)
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 9, No. 6, 930, 02.06.2017.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Economic Valuation of the Aquatic Biodiversity Conservation in South Korea: Correcting for the Endogeneity Bias in Contingent Valuation
AU - Choi, Ik Chang
AU - Kim, Hyun No
AU - Shin, Hio Jung
AU - Tenhunen, John
AU - Nguyen, Trung Thanh
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 by the authors. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/6/2
Y1 - 2017/6/2
N2 - In this study, we use the Contingent Valuation (CV) method to estimate households' willingness to pay (WTP) for the aquatic ecosystem health (biodiversity) improvement. This paper extends CV studies by dealing with the endogenous effect of a proxy variable, namely the subjective experience of negative environmental quality changes. The results show that the correction for the endogeneity bias facilitates the efficiency of parameter estimation in the empirical model. The mean WTP per household accounts for around 46.8% (KRW 79.6) of the current water use charge (KRW 170 per cubic meter). The total benefit from conserving the biodiversity is around KRW 198.62 billion. We found several factors that affect households' WTP for fish biodiversity conservation, suggesting the importance of these factors in the formulation of water policies associated with aquatic biodiversity. In addition, the inefficient water management costs should be redistributed to other projects or new programs such as for the fish biodiversity conservation.
AB - In this study, we use the Contingent Valuation (CV) method to estimate households' willingness to pay (WTP) for the aquatic ecosystem health (biodiversity) improvement. This paper extends CV studies by dealing with the endogenous effect of a proxy variable, namely the subjective experience of negative environmental quality changes. The results show that the correction for the endogeneity bias facilitates the efficiency of parameter estimation in the empirical model. The mean WTP per household accounts for around 46.8% (KRW 79.6) of the current water use charge (KRW 170 per cubic meter). The total benefit from conserving the biodiversity is around KRW 198.62 billion. We found several factors that affect households' WTP for fish biodiversity conservation, suggesting the importance of these factors in the formulation of water policies associated with aquatic biodiversity. In addition, the inefficient water management costs should be redistributed to other projects or new programs such as for the fish biodiversity conservation.
KW - Aquatic biodiversity
KW - Benefit calculation
KW - Bivariate probit model
KW - Contingent valuation method
KW - Endogeneity bias
KW - Willingness to pay
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020304241&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/su9060930
DO - 10.3390/su9060930
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85020304241
VL - 9
JO - Sustainability (Switzerland)
JF - Sustainability (Switzerland)
SN - 2071-1050
IS - 6
M1 - 930
ER -