Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Research in Labor Economics |
Publisher | JAI Press |
Pages | 275-313 |
Number of pages | 39 |
ISBN (print) | 0762306939, 9780762306930 |
Publication status | Published - 2000 |
Externally published | Yes |
Publication series
Name | Research in Labor Economics |
---|---|
Volume | 19 |
ISSN (Print) | 0147-9121 |
Abstract
We analyze the effectiveness of public works programs (PWP, Arbeits-beschaffungsmaßnahmen) in Eastern Germany as measured by their effects on individual future re-employment probabilities in regular jobs. These are estimated by discrete hazard rate models on the basis of individual-level panel data. We account for unobserved individual heterogeneity in both the PWP participation and in the outcome equations. We also test for selection on unobservables. We find that public works programs seem to have no special targeting focus on disadvantaged groups in the labor market and that participants are, on average, worse off concerning their re-employment prospects in regular jobs than unemployed people who do not join such a program. A possible explanation for this result is that PWP participants search less intensively for a regular job while on such a program than unemployed non-participants.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business, Management and Accounting(all)
- Industrial relations
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
- Economics and Econometrics
- Social Sciences(all)
- Political Science and International Relations
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
Research in Labor Economics. JAI Press, 2000. p. 275-313 (Research in Labor Economics; Vol. 19).
Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceeding › Contribution to book/anthology › Research › peer review
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - Do public works programs work in Eastern Germany?
AU - Kraus, Florian
AU - Puhani, Patrick A.
AU - Steiner, Viktor
N1 - Funding Information: Financial support from the German Science Foundation (DFG) under the project ‘Arbeitsmarktdynamik im ostdeutschen Transformationsprozess’ is gratefully acknowledged. is gratefully acknowledged. We thank two anonymous referees as well as Herbert S. Buscher, Hermann Buslei, François Laisney, Friedhelm Pfeiffer, Elke Wolf, ZEW, Mannheim, and Martin Eichler and Michael Lechner, SIAW, University of Sankt Gallen, for helpful comments. We also thank Avo Schönbohm and Anja Triebe for excellent research assistance. Any remaining errors are our own responsibility.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - We analyze the effectiveness of public works programs (PWP, Arbeits-beschaffungsmaßnahmen) in Eastern Germany as measured by their effects on individual future re-employment probabilities in regular jobs. These are estimated by discrete hazard rate models on the basis of individual-level panel data. We account for unobserved individual heterogeneity in both the PWP participation and in the outcome equations. We also test for selection on unobservables. We find that public works programs seem to have no special targeting focus on disadvantaged groups in the labor market and that participants are, on average, worse off concerning their re-employment prospects in regular jobs than unemployed people who do not join such a program. A possible explanation for this result is that PWP participants search less intensively for a regular job while on such a program than unemployed non-participants.
AB - We analyze the effectiveness of public works programs (PWP, Arbeits-beschaffungsmaßnahmen) in Eastern Germany as measured by their effects on individual future re-employment probabilities in regular jobs. These are estimated by discrete hazard rate models on the basis of individual-level panel data. We account for unobserved individual heterogeneity in both the PWP participation and in the outcome equations. We also test for selection on unobservables. We find that public works programs seem to have no special targeting focus on disadvantaged groups in the labor market and that participants are, on average, worse off concerning their re-employment prospects in regular jobs than unemployed people who do not join such a program. A possible explanation for this result is that PWP participants search less intensively for a regular job while on such a program than unemployed non-participants.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000011752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Contribution to book/anthology
AN - SCOPUS:0000011752
SN - 0762306939
SN - 9780762306930
T3 - Research in Labor Economics
SP - 275
EP - 313
BT - Research in Labor Economics
PB - JAI Press
ER -