Diverse values of nature for sustainability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Unai Pascual
  • Patricia Balvanera
  • Christopher B. Anderson
  • Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer
  • Michael Christie
  • David González-Jiménez
  • Adrian Martin
  • Christopher M. Raymond
  • Mette Termansen
  • Arild Vatn
  • Simone Athayde
  • Brigitte Baptiste
  • David N. Barton
  • Sander Jacobs
  • Eszter Kelemen
  • Ritesh Kumar
  • Elena Lazos
  • Tuyeni H. Mwampamba
  • Barbara Nakangu
  • Patrick O’Farrell
  • Suneetha M. Subramanian
  • Meine van Noordwijk
  • So Eun Ahn
  • Sacha Amaruzaman
  • Ariane M. Amin
  • Paola Arias-Arévalo
  • Gabriela Arroyo-Robles
  • Mariana Cantú-Fernández
  • Antonio J. Castro
  • Victoria Contreras
  • Alta De Vos
  • Nicolas Dendoncker
  • Stefanie Engel
  • Uta Eser
  • Daniel P. Faith
  • Anna Filyushkina
  • Houda Ghazi
  • Erik Gómez-Baggethun
  • Rachelle K. Gould
  • Louise Guibrunet
  • Haripriya Gundimeda
  • Thomas Hahn
  • Zuzana V. Harmáčková
  • Marcello Hernández-Blanco
  • Andra Ioana Horcea-Milcu
  • Mariaelena Huambachano
  • Natalia Lutti Hummel Wicher
  • Cem İskender Aydın
  • Mine Islar
  • Ann Kathrin Koessler
  • Jasper O. Kenter
  • Marina Kosmus
  • Heera Lee
  • Beria Leimona
  • Sharachchandra Lele
  • Dominic Lenzi
  • Bosco Lliso
  • Lelani M. Mannetti
  • Juliana Merçon
  • Ana Sofía Monroy-Sais
  • Nibedita Mukherjee
  • Barbara Muraca
  • Roldan Muradian
  • Ranjini Murali
  • Sara H. Nelson
  • Gabriel R. Nemogá-Soto
  • Jonas Ngouhouo-Poufoun
  • Aidin Niamir
  • Emmanuel Nuesiri
  • Tobias O. Nyumba
  • Begüm Özkaynak
  • Ignacio Palomo
  • Ram Pandit
  • Agnieszka Pawłowska-Mainville
  • Luciana Porter-Bolland
  • Martin Quaas
  • Julian Rode
  • Ricardo Rozzi
  • Sonya Sachdeva
  • Aibek Samakov
  • Marije Schaafsma
  • Nadia Sitas
  • Paula Ungar
  • Evonne Yiu
  • Yuki Yoshida
  • Eglee Zent

External Research Organisations

  • Basque Centre for Climate Change
  • Ikerbasque, the Basque Foundation for Science
  • University of Bern
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)
  • Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego (ICPA-UNTDF)
  • CONICET
  • World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Italy
  • University of Minnesota
  • Global Resilience Partnership
  • University of East Anglia
  • University of Helsinki
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Norwegian University of Life Sciences
  • Florida International University
  • University of EAN
  • Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA)
  • Belgian National Fund Scientific Research
  • Belgian Biodiversity Platform
  • Environmental social science research group (ESSRG)
  • Wetlands International South Asia
  • Sokoine University of Agriculture
  • University of the Western Cape
  • United Nations University - Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources - UNU-FLORES
  • United Nations
  • Center for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF)
  • Wageningen University and Research
  • Brawijaya University
  • Korea Environment Institute (KEI)
  • University of Cocody
  • Centre Suisse de Recherche Scientifique
  • Universidad del Valle
  • University of Almeria
  • Rhodes University
  • University of Stellenbosch
  • Osnabrück University
  • University of Sydney
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  • Vrije Universiteit
  • OCP Foundation
  • University of Vermont
  • Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB)
  • Stockholm Resilience Centre (SRC)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS)
  • University of Kassel
  • Syracuse University
  • Fundacao Getulio Vargas
  • Bogazici University
  • Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies (LUCSUS)
  • Ecologos Research Ltd
  • Univ. York, Dep. Comput. Sci., Non-Stand. Comput. Group
  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GIZ
  • Konkuk University
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
  • ATREE
  • Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune
  • Shiv Nadar University
  • University of Twente
  • World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA)
  • Georgia State University
  • Universidad Veracruzana
  • Brunel University
  • University of Oregon
  • Universidade Federal Fluminense
  • The Snow Leopard Trust
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (HU Berlin)
  • University of British Columbia
  • University of Winnipeg
  • Universidad Nacional de Colombia
  • International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan
  • Congo Basin Institute (CBI)
  • LOEWE Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre
  • African Leadership College (ALC)
  • African Conservation Centre
  • University Grenoble-Alpes (UGA)
  • University of Western Australia
  • Hokkaido University
  • University of Northern British Columbia
  • Nicolaus Copernicus University
  • Instituto de Ecologia, A.C.
  • German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ)
  • UNIVERSIDAD DE MAGALLANES
  • University of North Texas
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Aigine Cultural Research Center
  • University of Southampton
  • Field Museum of Natural History
  • Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC
  • National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan
  • Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Cientificas
  • Aberystwyth University
  • University of Tübingen
  • University of Namur
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
JournalNATURE
Volume620
Early online date9 Aug 2023
Publication statusPublished - 24 Aug 2023

Abstract

Twenty-five years since foundational publications on valuing ecosystem services for human well-being 1,2, addressing the global biodiversity crisis 3 still implies confronting barriers to incorporating nature’s diverse values into decision-making. These barriers include powerful interests supported by current norms and legal rules such as property rights, which determine whose values and which values of nature are acted on. A better understanding of how and why nature is (under)valued is more urgent than ever 4. Notwithstanding agreements to incorporate nature’s values into actions, including the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) 5 and the UN Sustainable Development Goals 6, predominant environmental and development policies still prioritize a subset of values, particularly those linked to markets, and ignore other ways people relate to and benefit from nature 7. Arguably, a ‘values crisis’ underpins the intertwined crises of biodiversity loss and climate change 8, pandemic emergence 9 and socio-environmental injustices 10. On the basis of more than 50,000 scientific publications, policy documents and Indigenous and local knowledge sources, the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) assessed knowledge on nature’s diverse values and valuation methods to gain insights into their role in policymaking and fuller integration into decisions 7,11. Applying this evidence, combinations of values-centred approaches are proposed to improve valuation and address barriers to uptake, ultimately leveraging transformative changes towards more just (that is, fair treatment of people and nature, including inter- and intragenerational equity) and sustainable futures.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Diverse values of nature for sustainability. / Pascual, Unai; Balvanera, Patricia; Anderson, Christopher B. et al.
In: NATURE, Vol. 620, 24.08.2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Pascual, U, Balvanera, P, Anderson, CB, Chaplin-Kramer, R, Christie, M, González-Jiménez, D, Martin, A, Raymond, CM, Termansen, M, Vatn, A, Athayde, S, Baptiste, B, Barton, DN, Jacobs, S, Kelemen, E, Kumar, R, Lazos, E, Mwampamba, TH, Nakangu, B, O’Farrell, P, Subramanian, SM, van Noordwijk, M, Ahn, SE, Amaruzaman, S, Amin, AM, Arias-Arévalo, P, Arroyo-Robles, G, Cantú-Fernández, M, Castro, AJ, Contreras, V, De Vos, A, Dendoncker, N, Engel, S, Eser, U, Faith, DP, Filyushkina, A, Ghazi, H, Gómez-Baggethun, E, Gould, RK, Guibrunet, L, Gundimeda, H, Hahn, T, Harmáčková, ZV, Hernández-Blanco, M, Horcea-Milcu, AI, Huambachano, M, Wicher, NLH, Aydın, Cİ, Islar, M, Koessler, AK, Kenter, JO, Kosmus, M, Lee, H, Leimona, B, Lele, S, Lenzi, D, Lliso, B, Mannetti, LM, Merçon, J, Monroy-Sais, AS, Mukherjee, N, Muraca, B, Muradian, R, Murali, R, Nelson, SH, Nemogá-Soto, GR, Ngouhouo-Poufoun, J, Niamir, A, Nuesiri, E, Nyumba, TO, Özkaynak, B, Palomo, I, Pandit, R, Pawłowska-Mainville, A, Porter-Bolland, L, Quaas, M, Rode, J, Rozzi, R, Sachdeva, S, Samakov, A, Schaafsma, M, Sitas, N, Ungar, P, Yiu, E, Yoshida, Y & Zent, E 2023, 'Diverse values of nature for sustainability', NATURE, vol. 620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9
Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Anderson, C. B., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Christie, M., González-Jiménez, D., Martin, A., Raymond, C. M., Termansen, M., Vatn, A., Athayde, S., Baptiste, B., Barton, D. N., Jacobs, S., Kelemen, E., Kumar, R., Lazos, E., Mwampamba, T. H., Nakangu, B., ... Zent, E. (2023). Diverse values of nature for sustainability. NATURE, 620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9
Pascual U, Balvanera P, Anderson CB, Chaplin-Kramer R, Christie M, González-Jiménez D et al. Diverse values of nature for sustainability. NATURE. 2023 Aug 24;620. Epub 2023 Aug 9. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9
Pascual, Unai ; Balvanera, Patricia ; Anderson, Christopher B. et al. / Diverse values of nature for sustainability. In: NATURE. 2023 ; Vol. 620.
Download
@article{97aa4ee2474d439ea56a424f89cd0af5,
title = "Diverse values of nature for sustainability",
abstract = "Twenty-five years since foundational publications on valuing ecosystem services for human well-being 1,2, addressing the global biodiversity crisis 3 still implies confronting barriers to incorporating nature{\textquoteright}s diverse values into decision-making. These barriers include powerful interests supported by current norms and legal rules such as property rights, which determine whose values and which values of nature are acted on. A better understanding of how and why nature is (under)valued is more urgent than ever 4. Notwithstanding agreements to incorporate nature{\textquoteright}s values into actions, including the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) 5 and the UN Sustainable Development Goals 6, predominant environmental and development policies still prioritize a subset of values, particularly those linked to markets, and ignore other ways people relate to and benefit from nature 7. Arguably, a {\textquoteleft}values crisis{\textquoteright} underpins the intertwined crises of biodiversity loss and climate change 8, pandemic emergence 9 and socio-environmental injustices 10. On the basis of more than 50,000 scientific publications, policy documents and Indigenous and local knowledge sources, the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) assessed knowledge on nature{\textquoteright}s diverse values and valuation methods to gain insights into their role in policymaking and fuller integration into decisions 7,11. Applying this evidence, combinations of values-centred approaches are proposed to improve valuation and address barriers to uptake, ultimately leveraging transformative changes towards more just (that is, fair treatment of people and nature, including inter- and intragenerational equity) and sustainable futures.",
author = "Unai Pascual and Patricia Balvanera and Anderson, {Christopher B.} and Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer and Michael Christie and David Gonz{\'a}lez-Jim{\'e}nez and Adrian Martin and Raymond, {Christopher M.} and Mette Termansen and Arild Vatn and Simone Athayde and Brigitte Baptiste and Barton, {David N.} and Sander Jacobs and Eszter Kelemen and Ritesh Kumar and Elena Lazos and Mwampamba, {Tuyeni H.} and Barbara Nakangu and Patrick O{\textquoteright}Farrell and Subramanian, {Suneetha M.} and {van Noordwijk}, Meine and Ahn, {So Eun} and Sacha Amaruzaman and Amin, {Ariane M.} and Paola Arias-Ar{\'e}valo and Gabriela Arroyo-Robles and Mariana Cant{\'u}-Fern{\'a}ndez and Castro, {Antonio J.} and Victoria Contreras and {De Vos}, Alta and Nicolas Dendoncker and Stefanie Engel and Uta Eser and Faith, {Daniel P.} and Anna Filyushkina and Houda Ghazi and Erik G{\'o}mez-Baggethun and Gould, {Rachelle K.} and Louise Guibrunet and Haripriya Gundimeda and Thomas Hahn and Harm{\'a}{\v c}kov{\'a}, {Zuzana V.} and Marcello Hern{\'a}ndez-Blanco and Horcea-Milcu, {Andra Ioana} and Mariaelena Huambachano and Wicher, {Natalia Lutti Hummel} and Aydın, {Cem İskender} and Mine Islar and Koessler, {Ann Kathrin} and Kenter, {Jasper O.} and Marina Kosmus and Heera Lee and Beria Leimona and Sharachchandra Lele and Dominic Lenzi and Bosco Lliso and Mannetti, {Lelani M.} and Juliana Mer{\c c}on and Monroy-Sais, {Ana Sof{\'i}a} and Nibedita Mukherjee and Barbara Muraca and Roldan Muradian and Ranjini Murali and Nelson, {Sara H.} and Nemog{\'a}-Soto, {Gabriel R.} and Jonas Ngouhouo-Poufoun and Aidin Niamir and Emmanuel Nuesiri and Nyumba, {Tobias O.} and Beg{\"u}m {\"O}zkaynak and Ignacio Palomo and Ram Pandit and Agnieszka Paw{\l}owska-Mainville and Luciana Porter-Bolland and Martin Quaas and Julian Rode and Ricardo Rozzi and Sonya Sachdeva and Aibek Samakov and Marije Schaafsma and Nadia Sitas and Paula Ungar and Evonne Yiu and Yuki Yoshida and Eglee Zent",
note = "Funding Information: We are grateful to the IPBES, whose 139-member states commissioned the Values Assessment and approved its Summary for Policymakers. We are also grateful for the contributions to the assessment{\textquoteright}s review editors: S. Anderson, S. Baker, J. Camilo Cardenas, J. Cari{\~n}o, K. Chan, J. Farley, C. Okereke, L. Pereira, E. Raez, H. Vessuri and R. Watson; the members of the management committee: B. Vil{\'a}, A. D{\'i}az-de-Le{\'o}n, C. Diaw, M. Avdibegovic, J. Marton-Lefevre and R. Allahverdiyev, and the more than 200 contributing authors who provided specific input to the full report. We express our gratitude to IPBES Executive Secretary A. Larigauderie and IPBES Chair A. M. Hern{\'a}ndez for their strategic vision and continued advice. We received no specific funding for this work; all authors involved in IPBES do so on a voluntary basis. The IPBES Values Assessment was made possible thanks to many generous contributions, including non-earmarked contributions to the IPBES trust fund from governments. All donors are listed on the IPBES website www.ipbes.net/donors . U.P. acknowledges BC3{\textquoteright}s Maria de Maeztu excellence accreditation 2023–2026 (reference no. CEX2021-001201-M) provided by grant no. MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. ",
year = "2023",
month = aug,
day = "24",
doi = "10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9",
language = "English",
volume = "620",
journal = "NATURE",
issn = "0028-0836",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diverse values of nature for sustainability

AU - Pascual, Unai

AU - Balvanera, Patricia

AU - Anderson, Christopher B.

AU - Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca

AU - Christie, Michael

AU - González-Jiménez, David

AU - Martin, Adrian

AU - Raymond, Christopher M.

AU - Termansen, Mette

AU - Vatn, Arild

AU - Athayde, Simone

AU - Baptiste, Brigitte

AU - Barton, David N.

AU - Jacobs, Sander

AU - Kelemen, Eszter

AU - Kumar, Ritesh

AU - Lazos, Elena

AU - Mwampamba, Tuyeni H.

AU - Nakangu, Barbara

AU - O’Farrell, Patrick

AU - Subramanian, Suneetha M.

AU - van Noordwijk, Meine

AU - Ahn, So Eun

AU - Amaruzaman, Sacha

AU - Amin, Ariane M.

AU - Arias-Arévalo, Paola

AU - Arroyo-Robles, Gabriela

AU - Cantú-Fernández, Mariana

AU - Castro, Antonio J.

AU - Contreras, Victoria

AU - De Vos, Alta

AU - Dendoncker, Nicolas

AU - Engel, Stefanie

AU - Eser, Uta

AU - Faith, Daniel P.

AU - Filyushkina, Anna

AU - Ghazi, Houda

AU - Gómez-Baggethun, Erik

AU - Gould, Rachelle K.

AU - Guibrunet, Louise

AU - Gundimeda, Haripriya

AU - Hahn, Thomas

AU - Harmáčková, Zuzana V.

AU - Hernández-Blanco, Marcello

AU - Horcea-Milcu, Andra Ioana

AU - Huambachano, Mariaelena

AU - Wicher, Natalia Lutti Hummel

AU - Aydın, Cem İskender

AU - Islar, Mine

AU - Koessler, Ann Kathrin

AU - Kenter, Jasper O.

AU - Kosmus, Marina

AU - Lee, Heera

AU - Leimona, Beria

AU - Lele, Sharachchandra

AU - Lenzi, Dominic

AU - Lliso, Bosco

AU - Mannetti, Lelani M.

AU - Merçon, Juliana

AU - Monroy-Sais, Ana Sofía

AU - Mukherjee, Nibedita

AU - Muraca, Barbara

AU - Muradian, Roldan

AU - Murali, Ranjini

AU - Nelson, Sara H.

AU - Nemogá-Soto, Gabriel R.

AU - Ngouhouo-Poufoun, Jonas

AU - Niamir, Aidin

AU - Nuesiri, Emmanuel

AU - Nyumba, Tobias O.

AU - Özkaynak, Begüm

AU - Palomo, Ignacio

AU - Pandit, Ram

AU - Pawłowska-Mainville, Agnieszka

AU - Porter-Bolland, Luciana

AU - Quaas, Martin

AU - Rode, Julian

AU - Rozzi, Ricardo

AU - Sachdeva, Sonya

AU - Samakov, Aibek

AU - Schaafsma, Marije

AU - Sitas, Nadia

AU - Ungar, Paula

AU - Yiu, Evonne

AU - Yoshida, Yuki

AU - Zent, Eglee

N1 - Funding Information: We are grateful to the IPBES, whose 139-member states commissioned the Values Assessment and approved its Summary for Policymakers. We are also grateful for the contributions to the assessment’s review editors: S. Anderson, S. Baker, J. Camilo Cardenas, J. Cariño, K. Chan, J. Farley, C. Okereke, L. Pereira, E. Raez, H. Vessuri and R. Watson; the members of the management committee: B. Vilá, A. Díaz-de-León, C. Diaw, M. Avdibegovic, J. Marton-Lefevre and R. Allahverdiyev, and the more than 200 contributing authors who provided specific input to the full report. We express our gratitude to IPBES Executive Secretary A. Larigauderie and IPBES Chair A. M. Hernández for their strategic vision and continued advice. We received no specific funding for this work; all authors involved in IPBES do so on a voluntary basis. The IPBES Values Assessment was made possible thanks to many generous contributions, including non-earmarked contributions to the IPBES trust fund from governments. All donors are listed on the IPBES website www.ipbes.net/donors . U.P. acknowledges BC3’s Maria de Maeztu excellence accreditation 2023–2026 (reference no. CEX2021-001201-M) provided by grant no. MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033.

PY - 2023/8/24

Y1 - 2023/8/24

N2 - Twenty-five years since foundational publications on valuing ecosystem services for human well-being 1,2, addressing the global biodiversity crisis 3 still implies confronting barriers to incorporating nature’s diverse values into decision-making. These barriers include powerful interests supported by current norms and legal rules such as property rights, which determine whose values and which values of nature are acted on. A better understanding of how and why nature is (under)valued is more urgent than ever 4. Notwithstanding agreements to incorporate nature’s values into actions, including the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) 5 and the UN Sustainable Development Goals 6, predominant environmental and development policies still prioritize a subset of values, particularly those linked to markets, and ignore other ways people relate to and benefit from nature 7. Arguably, a ‘values crisis’ underpins the intertwined crises of biodiversity loss and climate change 8, pandemic emergence 9 and socio-environmental injustices 10. On the basis of more than 50,000 scientific publications, policy documents and Indigenous and local knowledge sources, the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) assessed knowledge on nature’s diverse values and valuation methods to gain insights into their role in policymaking and fuller integration into decisions 7,11. Applying this evidence, combinations of values-centred approaches are proposed to improve valuation and address barriers to uptake, ultimately leveraging transformative changes towards more just (that is, fair treatment of people and nature, including inter- and intragenerational equity) and sustainable futures.

AB - Twenty-five years since foundational publications on valuing ecosystem services for human well-being 1,2, addressing the global biodiversity crisis 3 still implies confronting barriers to incorporating nature’s diverse values into decision-making. These barriers include powerful interests supported by current norms and legal rules such as property rights, which determine whose values and which values of nature are acted on. A better understanding of how and why nature is (under)valued is more urgent than ever 4. Notwithstanding agreements to incorporate nature’s values into actions, including the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) 5 and the UN Sustainable Development Goals 6, predominant environmental and development policies still prioritize a subset of values, particularly those linked to markets, and ignore other ways people relate to and benefit from nature 7. Arguably, a ‘values crisis’ underpins the intertwined crises of biodiversity loss and climate change 8, pandemic emergence 9 and socio-environmental injustices 10. On the basis of more than 50,000 scientific publications, policy documents and Indigenous and local knowledge sources, the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) assessed knowledge on nature’s diverse values and valuation methods to gain insights into their role in policymaking and fuller integration into decisions 7,11. Applying this evidence, combinations of values-centred approaches are proposed to improve valuation and address barriers to uptake, ultimately leveraging transformative changes towards more just (that is, fair treatment of people and nature, including inter- and intragenerational equity) and sustainable futures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85167358387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9

DO - 10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85167358387

VL - 620

JO - NATURE

JF - NATURE

SN - 0028-0836

ER -

By the same author(s)