Die naturschutzrechtliche Eingriffsregelung im Klimawandel: Herausforderungen und Perspektiven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

Authors

  • Tim Wenzel
  • Christina von Haaren
  • Hannah Marie Burmester

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Translated title of the contributionGerman impact mitigation regulation and climate change – challenges and perspectives
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)28 - 35
Number of pages8
JournalNaturschutz und Landschaftsplanung
Volume54
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 4 Mar 2022

Abstract

Climate change is a hot topic for environmental impact regulation. How the environment reacts to impacts is affected by changing climate conditions. In addition, necessary compensation measures must adapt to the effects of climate change in order to be effective. Science and nature conservation practice seek to understand these issues. A few publications discuss the implications for German impact mitigation regulation (Eingriffsregelung – EGR). However, there is no consistent concept about how to incorporate/consider climate change in the further development of EGR implementation. This review article summarizes existing approaches to cope with climate change in environmental impact compensation, describes strategies to put these approaches into practice in the EGR, and identifies needs for action and for research. The research shows that EGR can use approaches that determine uncertainties in the predicted effects of climate change on the environment. Also, practical methods for determining CO 2 emissions exist and can be used in impact management. Some methods exist that can project the effects of climate change onto compensation areas, but they need to be developed further. In the future, impact mitigation should be “climate proof”. New ways of legal and financial implementation need to be developed. We suggest funding the costs via a nationwide CO 2 tax. Federal states or municipalities are not solely responsible for paying for the collective costs of climate change.

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Die naturschutzrechtliche Eingriffsregelung im Klimawandel: Herausforderungen und Perspektiven. / Wenzel, Tim; von Haaren, Christina; Burmester, Hannah Marie.
In: Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, Vol. 54, No. 3, 04.03.2022, p. 28 - 35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

Wenzel, T, von Haaren, C & Burmester, HM 2022, 'Die naturschutzrechtliche Eingriffsregelung im Klimawandel: Herausforderungen und Perspektiven', Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 28 - 35. https://doi.org/10.1399/NuL.2022.03.03
Wenzel, T., von Haaren, C., & Burmester, H. M. (2022). Die naturschutzrechtliche Eingriffsregelung im Klimawandel: Herausforderungen und Perspektiven. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, 54(3), 28 - 35. https://doi.org/10.1399/NuL.2022.03.03
Wenzel T, von Haaren C, Burmester HM. Die naturschutzrechtliche Eingriffsregelung im Klimawandel: Herausforderungen und Perspektiven. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung. 2022 Mar 4;54(3):28 - 35. doi: 10.1399/NuL.2022.03.03
Wenzel, Tim ; von Haaren, Christina ; Burmester, Hannah Marie. / Die naturschutzrechtliche Eingriffsregelung im Klimawandel: Herausforderungen und Perspektiven. In: Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung. 2022 ; Vol. 54, No. 3. pp. 28 - 35.
Download
@article{4d47435f058340d78b1f619c86c92d0e,
title = "Die naturschutzrechtliche Eingriffsregelung im Klimawandel: Herausforderungen und Perspektiven",
abstract = "Climate change is a hot topic for environmental impact regulation. How the environment reacts to impacts is affected by changing climate conditions. In addition, necessary compensation measures must adapt to the effects of climate change in order to be effective. Science and nature conservation practice seek to understand these issues. A few publications discuss the implications for German impact mitigation regulation (Eingriffsregelung – EGR). However, there is no consistent concept about how to incorporate/consider climate change in the further development of EGR implementation. This review article summarizes existing approaches to cope with climate change in environmental impact compensation, describes strategies to put these approaches into practice in the EGR, and identifies needs for action and for research. The research shows that EGR can use approaches that determine uncertainties in the predicted effects of climate change on the environment. Also, practical methods for determining CO 2 emissions exist and can be used in impact management. Some methods exist that can project the effects of climate change onto compensation areas, but they need to be developed further. In the future, impact mitigation should be “climate proof”. New ways of legal and financial implementation need to be developed. We suggest funding the costs via a nationwide CO 2 tax. Federal states or municipalities are not solely responsible for paying for the collective costs of climate change.",
author = "Tim Wenzel and {von Haaren}, Christina and Burmester, {Hannah Marie}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, Verlag Eugen Ulmer. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
day = "4",
doi = "10.1399/NuL.2022.03.03",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "54",
pages = "28 -- 35",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Die naturschutzrechtliche Eingriffsregelung im Klimawandel: Herausforderungen und Perspektiven

AU - Wenzel, Tim

AU - von Haaren, Christina

AU - Burmester, Hannah Marie

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022, Verlag Eugen Ulmer. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/3/4

Y1 - 2022/3/4

N2 - Climate change is a hot topic for environmental impact regulation. How the environment reacts to impacts is affected by changing climate conditions. In addition, necessary compensation measures must adapt to the effects of climate change in order to be effective. Science and nature conservation practice seek to understand these issues. A few publications discuss the implications for German impact mitigation regulation (Eingriffsregelung – EGR). However, there is no consistent concept about how to incorporate/consider climate change in the further development of EGR implementation. This review article summarizes existing approaches to cope with climate change in environmental impact compensation, describes strategies to put these approaches into practice in the EGR, and identifies needs for action and for research. The research shows that EGR can use approaches that determine uncertainties in the predicted effects of climate change on the environment. Also, practical methods for determining CO 2 emissions exist and can be used in impact management. Some methods exist that can project the effects of climate change onto compensation areas, but they need to be developed further. In the future, impact mitigation should be “climate proof”. New ways of legal and financial implementation need to be developed. We suggest funding the costs via a nationwide CO 2 tax. Federal states or municipalities are not solely responsible for paying for the collective costs of climate change.

AB - Climate change is a hot topic for environmental impact regulation. How the environment reacts to impacts is affected by changing climate conditions. In addition, necessary compensation measures must adapt to the effects of climate change in order to be effective. Science and nature conservation practice seek to understand these issues. A few publications discuss the implications for German impact mitigation regulation (Eingriffsregelung – EGR). However, there is no consistent concept about how to incorporate/consider climate change in the further development of EGR implementation. This review article summarizes existing approaches to cope with climate change in environmental impact compensation, describes strategies to put these approaches into practice in the EGR, and identifies needs for action and for research. The research shows that EGR can use approaches that determine uncertainties in the predicted effects of climate change on the environment. Also, practical methods for determining CO 2 emissions exist and can be used in impact management. Some methods exist that can project the effects of climate change onto compensation areas, but they need to be developed further. In the future, impact mitigation should be “climate proof”. New ways of legal and financial implementation need to be developed. We suggest funding the costs via a nationwide CO 2 tax. Federal states or municipalities are not solely responsible for paying for the collective costs of climate change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128472072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1399/NuL.2022.03.03

DO - 10.1399/NuL.2022.03.03

M3 - Artikel

VL - 54

SP - 28

EP - 35

JO - Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung

JF - Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung

SN - 0940-6808

IS - 3

ER -