Deutsche Empfehlungen zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation: Revidierte Fassung des Hannoveraner Konsens

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • K. Betschorn
  • M. Biller
  • J. G. Brecht
  • J. Clouth
  • F. U. Fricke
  • G. Glaeske
  • W. Greiner
  • G. Hartman
  • K. Kamke
  • M. Köhler
  • A. Kilburg
  • K. W. Lauterbach
  • R. Leidl
  • O. Mast
  • C. Naujoks
  • R. Rychlik
  • O. Schoffski
  • M. Graf von der Schulenburg
  • P. A. Thurmann
  • T. Volmer
  • K. Waldorf
  • W. J. Weinreich

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH
  • IKK Westfalen-Lippe
  • InForMed GmbH
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Novartis AG
  • Barmer Ersatzkasse
  • Deutsche BKK
  • Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim
  • Institut für empirische Gesundheitsökonomie (IFEG)
  • University of Cologne
  • Ulm University
  • Bayer Vital GmbH
  • Helios Klinikum Wuppertal
  • GlaxoSmithKline GmbH and Co. KG
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
View graph of relations

Details

Translated title of the contributionGerman recommendations on health economic evaluation studies. Revised version of the Hannover consensus: Revised version of the hannover consensus
Original languageMultiple languages
Pages (from-to)52-55
Number of pages4
JournalMedizinische Klinik
Volume95
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2000

Abstract

Financial restrictions and stronger orientation towards outcomes increasingly demand rational decisions to be made about the use of resources in the health care system. Such decisions are the subject of medical, ethical and economic considerations. Management of the health care system requires medical and economic orientation both at the general level and with regard to the selection of suitable forms of care in hospital and medical practices. In this context, evaluative health economics can be a valuable decision-making aid. In order for the results of health economic evaluation studies to be validly interpreted, a minimum of standard methodology and sufficient transparency is required. To this end, recommendations were developed. They are intended to convey standard approaches, without unnecessarily constraining methodologic progress and scientific freedom. Ongoing refinement of the guidelines and adaptation of the current state of health economic research are desirable.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Deutsche Empfehlungen zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation: Revidierte Fassung des Hannoveraner Konsens. / Betschorn, K.; Biller, M.; Brecht, J. G. et al.
In: Medizinische Klinik, Vol. 95, No. 1, 01.2000, p. 52-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer review

Betschorn, K, Biller, M, Brecht, JG, Clouth, J, Fricke, FU, Glaeske, G, Greiner, W, Hartman, G, Kamke, K, Köhler, M, Kilburg, A, Lauterbach, KW, Leidl, R, Mast, O, Naujoks, C, Rychlik, R, Schoffski, O, Graf von der Schulenburg, M, Thurmann, PA, Volmer, T, Waldorf, K & Weinreich, WJ 2000, 'Deutsche Empfehlungen zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation: Revidierte Fassung des Hannoveraner Konsens', Medizinische Klinik, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 52-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03044983
Betschorn, K., Biller, M., Brecht, J. G., Clouth, J., Fricke, F. U., Glaeske, G., Greiner, W., Hartman, G., Kamke, K., Köhler, M., Kilburg, A., Lauterbach, K. W., Leidl, R., Mast, O., Naujoks, C., Rychlik, R., Schoffski, O., Graf von der Schulenburg, M., Thurmann, P. A., ... Weinreich, W. J. (2000). Deutsche Empfehlungen zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation: Revidierte Fassung des Hannoveraner Konsens. Medizinische Klinik, 95(1), 52-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03044983
Betschorn K, Biller M, Brecht JG, Clouth J, Fricke FU, Glaeske G et al. Deutsche Empfehlungen zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation: Revidierte Fassung des Hannoveraner Konsens. Medizinische Klinik. 2000 Jan;95(1):52-55. doi: 10.1007/bf03044983
Betschorn, K. ; Biller, M. ; Brecht, J. G. et al. / Deutsche Empfehlungen zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation : Revidierte Fassung des Hannoveraner Konsens. In: Medizinische Klinik. 2000 ; Vol. 95, No. 1. pp. 52-55.
Download
@article{75823bb202c14d638f92057d7f8ca901,
title = "Deutsche Empfehlungen zur gesundheits{\"o}konomischen Evaluation: Revidierte Fassung des Hannoveraner Konsens",
abstract = "Financial restrictions and stronger orientation towards outcomes increasingly demand rational decisions to be made about the use of resources in the health care system. Such decisions are the subject of medical, ethical and economic considerations. Management of the health care system requires medical and economic orientation both at the general level and with regard to the selection of suitable forms of care in hospital and medical practices. In this context, evaluative health economics can be a valuable decision-making aid. In order for the results of health economic evaluation studies to be validly interpreted, a minimum of standard methodology and sufficient transparency is required. To this end, recommendations were developed. They are intended to convey standard approaches, without unnecessarily constraining methodologic progress and scientific freedom. Ongoing refinement of the guidelines and adaptation of the current state of health economic research are desirable.",
keywords = "Evaluation, Germany, Guidelines, Health economics",
author = "K. Betschorn and M. Biller and Brecht, {J. G.} and J. Clouth and Fricke, {F. U.} and G. Glaeske and W. Greiner and G. Hartman and K. Kamke and M. K{\"o}hler and A. Kilburg and Lauterbach, {K. W.} and R. Leidl and O. Mast and C. Naujoks and R. Rychlik and O. Schoffski and {Graf von der Schulenburg}, M. and Thurmann, {P. A.} and T. Volmer and K. Waldorf and Weinreich, {W. J.}",
year = "2000",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1007/bf03044983",
language = "Multiple languages",
volume = "95",
pages = "52--55",
journal = "Medizinische Klinik",
issn = "0723-5003",
publisher = "Urban und Vogel",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deutsche Empfehlungen zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation

T2 - Revidierte Fassung des Hannoveraner Konsens

AU - Betschorn, K.

AU - Biller, M.

AU - Brecht, J. G.

AU - Clouth, J.

AU - Fricke, F. U.

AU - Glaeske, G.

AU - Greiner, W.

AU - Hartman, G.

AU - Kamke, K.

AU - Köhler, M.

AU - Kilburg, A.

AU - Lauterbach, K. W.

AU - Leidl, R.

AU - Mast, O.

AU - Naujoks, C.

AU - Rychlik, R.

AU - Schoffski, O.

AU - Graf von der Schulenburg, M.

AU - Thurmann, P. A.

AU - Volmer, T.

AU - Waldorf, K.

AU - Weinreich, W. J.

PY - 2000/1

Y1 - 2000/1

N2 - Financial restrictions and stronger orientation towards outcomes increasingly demand rational decisions to be made about the use of resources in the health care system. Such decisions are the subject of medical, ethical and economic considerations. Management of the health care system requires medical and economic orientation both at the general level and with regard to the selection of suitable forms of care in hospital and medical practices. In this context, evaluative health economics can be a valuable decision-making aid. In order for the results of health economic evaluation studies to be validly interpreted, a minimum of standard methodology and sufficient transparency is required. To this end, recommendations were developed. They are intended to convey standard approaches, without unnecessarily constraining methodologic progress and scientific freedom. Ongoing refinement of the guidelines and adaptation of the current state of health economic research are desirable.

AB - Financial restrictions and stronger orientation towards outcomes increasingly demand rational decisions to be made about the use of resources in the health care system. Such decisions are the subject of medical, ethical and economic considerations. Management of the health care system requires medical and economic orientation both at the general level and with regard to the selection of suitable forms of care in hospital and medical practices. In this context, evaluative health economics can be a valuable decision-making aid. In order for the results of health economic evaluation studies to be validly interpreted, a minimum of standard methodology and sufficient transparency is required. To this end, recommendations were developed. They are intended to convey standard approaches, without unnecessarily constraining methodologic progress and scientific freedom. Ongoing refinement of the guidelines and adaptation of the current state of health economic research are desirable.

KW - Evaluation

KW - Germany

KW - Guidelines

KW - Health economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034650769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/bf03044983

DO - 10.1007/bf03044983

M3 - Review article

C2 - 10668346

AN - SCOPUS:0034650769

VL - 95

SP - 52

EP - 55

JO - Medizinische Klinik

JF - Medizinische Klinik

SN - 0723-5003

IS - 1

ER -