Details
| Translated title of the contribution | German recommendations on health economic evaluation studies. Revised version of the Hannover consensus: Revised version of the hannover consensus |
|---|---|
| Original language | Multiple languages |
| Pages (from-to) | 52-55 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Medizinische Klinik |
| Volume | 95 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2000 |
Abstract
Financial restrictions and stronger orientation towards outcomes increasingly demand rational decisions to be made about the use of resources in the health care system. Such decisions are the subject of medical, ethical and economic considerations. Management of the health care system requires medical and economic orientation both at the general level and with regard to the selection of suitable forms of care in hospital and medical practices. In this context, evaluative health economics can be a valuable decision-making aid. In order for the results of health economic evaluation studies to be validly interpreted, a minimum of standard methodology and sufficient transparency is required. To this end, recommendations were developed. They are intended to convey standard approaches, without unnecessarily constraining methodologic progress and scientific freedom. Ongoing refinement of the guidelines and adaptation of the current state of health economic research are desirable.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)
- General Medicine
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Medizinische Klinik, Vol. 95, No. 1, 01.2000, p. 52-55.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Deutsche Empfehlungen zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation
T2 - Revidierte Fassung des Hannoveraner Konsens
AU - Betschorn, K.
AU - Biller, M.
AU - Brecht, J. G.
AU - Clouth, J.
AU - Fricke, F. U.
AU - Glaeske, G.
AU - Greiner, W.
AU - Hartman, G.
AU - Kamke, K.
AU - Köhler, M.
AU - Kilburg, A.
AU - Lauterbach, K. W.
AU - Leidl, R.
AU - Mast, O.
AU - Naujoks, C.
AU - Rychlik, R.
AU - Schoffski, O.
AU - Graf von der Schulenburg, M.
AU - Thurmann, P. A.
AU - Volmer, T.
AU - Waldorf, K.
AU - Weinreich, W. J.
PY - 2000/1
Y1 - 2000/1
N2 - Financial restrictions and stronger orientation towards outcomes increasingly demand rational decisions to be made about the use of resources in the health care system. Such decisions are the subject of medical, ethical and economic considerations. Management of the health care system requires medical and economic orientation both at the general level and with regard to the selection of suitable forms of care in hospital and medical practices. In this context, evaluative health economics can be a valuable decision-making aid. In order for the results of health economic evaluation studies to be validly interpreted, a minimum of standard methodology and sufficient transparency is required. To this end, recommendations were developed. They are intended to convey standard approaches, without unnecessarily constraining methodologic progress and scientific freedom. Ongoing refinement of the guidelines and adaptation of the current state of health economic research are desirable.
AB - Financial restrictions and stronger orientation towards outcomes increasingly demand rational decisions to be made about the use of resources in the health care system. Such decisions are the subject of medical, ethical and economic considerations. Management of the health care system requires medical and economic orientation both at the general level and with regard to the selection of suitable forms of care in hospital and medical practices. In this context, evaluative health economics can be a valuable decision-making aid. In order for the results of health economic evaluation studies to be validly interpreted, a minimum of standard methodology and sufficient transparency is required. To this end, recommendations were developed. They are intended to convey standard approaches, without unnecessarily constraining methodologic progress and scientific freedom. Ongoing refinement of the guidelines and adaptation of the current state of health economic research are desirable.
KW - Evaluation
KW - Germany
KW - Guidelines
KW - Health economics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034650769&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/bf03044983
DO - 10.1007/bf03044983
M3 - Review article
C2 - 10668346
AN - SCOPUS:0034650769
VL - 95
SP - 52
EP - 55
JO - Medizinische Klinik
JF - Medizinische Klinik
SN - 0723-5003
IS - 1
ER -