Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 101712 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Journal of Asian Economics |
Volume | 91 |
Early online date | 24 Jan 2024 |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2024 |
Abstract
We use a panel dataset of around 3500 rural households from Southeast Asia and investigate evidence on crime victimization. More concretely, we ask (1) to what extent are rural people affected by crime? (2) What factors determine rural crime victimization? And (3) what are the impacts of crime victimization on welfare of rural households? We use the routine activity approach as the theoretical framework and apply different logit models to identify determinants of crime victimization. We find that 5.46% of the rural households have been victimized, mainly by theft, over the last 12 months, some of them even more than once. Living in a rural region with higher levels of inequality is positively correlated with the likelihood of theft victimization. Households with higher levels of crop commercialization are associated with a higher victimization risk, while households with more livestock and being more specialized in specific livestock species are associated with a lower risk. Moreover, past victimization and exposure to weather shocks are positively associated with the likelihood of being affected by crime. With respect to the impacts, we use the heteroscedasticity-based instrumental variable approach to account for endogeneity and find highly significant negative effects of agricultural theft victimization on food consumption and child health outcomes. We conclude that rural crime requires attention although overall incidence is low in rural Thailand and Vietnam. Guardianship should be promoted, especially in times of weather shocks. Finally, reducing inequality helps preventing theft.
Keywords
- Heteroscedasticity-based instrumental variable approach, Thailand, Vietnam, Logit model, Routine activity approach, Rural crime
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
- Finance
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
- Economics and Econometrics
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Journal of Asian Economics, Vol. 91, 101712, 04.2024.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Determinants and impacts of rural crime victimization
T2 - Evidence from a case study in Southeast Asia
AU - Grote, Ulrike
AU - Nguyen, Thanh Tung
AU - Nguyen, Trung Thanh
AU - Neubacher, Frank
N1 - Funding Information: This study relies on data from the long-term project No. 20220831434900116103, funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). For more detailed information, see http://www.tvsep.de .
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - We use a panel dataset of around 3500 rural households from Southeast Asia and investigate evidence on crime victimization. More concretely, we ask (1) to what extent are rural people affected by crime? (2) What factors determine rural crime victimization? And (3) what are the impacts of crime victimization on welfare of rural households? We use the routine activity approach as the theoretical framework and apply different logit models to identify determinants of crime victimization. We find that 5.46% of the rural households have been victimized, mainly by theft, over the last 12 months, some of them even more than once. Living in a rural region with higher levels of inequality is positively correlated with the likelihood of theft victimization. Households with higher levels of crop commercialization are associated with a higher victimization risk, while households with more livestock and being more specialized in specific livestock species are associated with a lower risk. Moreover, past victimization and exposure to weather shocks are positively associated with the likelihood of being affected by crime. With respect to the impacts, we use the heteroscedasticity-based instrumental variable approach to account for endogeneity and find highly significant negative effects of agricultural theft victimization on food consumption and child health outcomes. We conclude that rural crime requires attention although overall incidence is low in rural Thailand and Vietnam. Guardianship should be promoted, especially in times of weather shocks. Finally, reducing inequality helps preventing theft.
AB - We use a panel dataset of around 3500 rural households from Southeast Asia and investigate evidence on crime victimization. More concretely, we ask (1) to what extent are rural people affected by crime? (2) What factors determine rural crime victimization? And (3) what are the impacts of crime victimization on welfare of rural households? We use the routine activity approach as the theoretical framework and apply different logit models to identify determinants of crime victimization. We find that 5.46% of the rural households have been victimized, mainly by theft, over the last 12 months, some of them even more than once. Living in a rural region with higher levels of inequality is positively correlated with the likelihood of theft victimization. Households with higher levels of crop commercialization are associated with a higher victimization risk, while households with more livestock and being more specialized in specific livestock species are associated with a lower risk. Moreover, past victimization and exposure to weather shocks are positively associated with the likelihood of being affected by crime. With respect to the impacts, we use the heteroscedasticity-based instrumental variable approach to account for endogeneity and find highly significant negative effects of agricultural theft victimization on food consumption and child health outcomes. We conclude that rural crime requires attention although overall incidence is low in rural Thailand and Vietnam. Guardianship should be promoted, especially in times of weather shocks. Finally, reducing inequality helps preventing theft.
KW - Heteroscedasticity-based instrumental variable approach, Thailand, Vietnam
KW - Logit model
KW - Routine activity approach
KW - Rural crime
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183948712&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101712
DO - 10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101712
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85183948712
VL - 91
JO - Journal of Asian Economics
JF - Journal of Asian Economics
SN - 1049-0078
M1 - 101712
ER -