Deriving scale-transition matrices from map samples for simulated annealing-based aggregation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-116
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of GIS
Volume15
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 14 Dec 2009

Abstract

The goal of the research described in this article is to derive parameters necessary for the automatic generalization of land-cover maps. A digital land-cover map is often given as a partition of the plane into areas of different classes. Generalizing such maps is usually done by aggregating small areas into larger regions. This can be modelled using cost functions in an optimization process, where a major objective is to minimize the class changes. Thus, an important input parameter for the aggregation is the information about possible aggregation partners of individual object classes. This can be coded in terms of a transition matrix listing costs that are charged for changing a unit area from one class into another one. In our case we consider the problem of determining the transition matrix based on two data sets of different scales. We propose three options to solve the problem: (1) the conventional way where an expert defines manually the transition matrix, (2) to derive the transition matrix from an analysis of an overlay of both data sets, and (3) an automatic way where the optimization is iterated while adapting the transition matrix until the difference of the intersection areas between both data sets before and after the generalization is minimized. As underlying aggregation procedure we use an approach based on global combinatorial optimization. We tested our approach for two German topographic data sets of different origin, which are given in the same areal extent and were acquired at scales 1:1000 and 1:25,000, respectively. The evaluation of our results allows us to conclude that our method is promising for the derivation of transition matrices from map samples. In the discussion we describe the advantages and disadvantages and show options for future work.

Keywords

    Aggregation, Generalization, Knowledge acquisition, Multi-scale representation, Optimization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Deriving scale-transition matrices from map samples for simulated annealing-based aggregation. / Kieler, Birgit; Haunert, Jan Henrik; Sester, Monika.
In: Annals of GIS, Vol. 15, No. 2, 14.12.2009, p. 107-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Kieler B, Haunert JH, Sester M. Deriving scale-transition matrices from map samples for simulated annealing-based aggregation. Annals of GIS. 2009 Dec 14;15(2):107-116. doi: 10.1080/19475680903464639
Kieler, Birgit ; Haunert, Jan Henrik ; Sester, Monika. / Deriving scale-transition matrices from map samples for simulated annealing-based aggregation. In: Annals of GIS. 2009 ; Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 107-116.
Download
@article{fa4169e6ca29431c9b7c2250d7930853,
title = "Deriving scale-transition matrices from map samples for simulated annealing-based aggregation",
abstract = "The goal of the research described in this article is to derive parameters necessary for the automatic generalization of land-cover maps. A digital land-cover map is often given as a partition of the plane into areas of different classes. Generalizing such maps is usually done by aggregating small areas into larger regions. This can be modelled using cost functions in an optimization process, where a major objective is to minimize the class changes. Thus, an important input parameter for the aggregation is the information about possible aggregation partners of individual object classes. This can be coded in terms of a transition matrix listing costs that are charged for changing a unit area from one class into another one. In our case we consider the problem of determining the transition matrix based on two data sets of different scales. We propose three options to solve the problem: (1) the conventional way where an expert defines manually the transition matrix, (2) to derive the transition matrix from an analysis of an overlay of both data sets, and (3) an automatic way where the optimization is iterated while adapting the transition matrix until the difference of the intersection areas between both data sets before and after the generalization is minimized. As underlying aggregation procedure we use an approach based on global combinatorial optimization. We tested our approach for two German topographic data sets of different origin, which are given in the same areal extent and were acquired at scales 1:1000 and 1:25,000, respectively. The evaluation of our results allows us to conclude that our method is promising for the derivation of transition matrices from map samples. In the discussion we describe the advantages and disadvantages and show options for future work.",
keywords = "Aggregation, Generalization, Knowledge acquisition, Multi-scale representation, Optimization",
author = "Birgit Kieler and Haunert, {Jan Henrik} and Monika Sester",
year = "2009",
month = dec,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1080/19475680903464639",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "107--116",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deriving scale-transition matrices from map samples for simulated annealing-based aggregation

AU - Kieler, Birgit

AU - Haunert, Jan Henrik

AU - Sester, Monika

PY - 2009/12/14

Y1 - 2009/12/14

N2 - The goal of the research described in this article is to derive parameters necessary for the automatic generalization of land-cover maps. A digital land-cover map is often given as a partition of the plane into areas of different classes. Generalizing such maps is usually done by aggregating small areas into larger regions. This can be modelled using cost functions in an optimization process, where a major objective is to minimize the class changes. Thus, an important input parameter for the aggregation is the information about possible aggregation partners of individual object classes. This can be coded in terms of a transition matrix listing costs that are charged for changing a unit area from one class into another one. In our case we consider the problem of determining the transition matrix based on two data sets of different scales. We propose three options to solve the problem: (1) the conventional way where an expert defines manually the transition matrix, (2) to derive the transition matrix from an analysis of an overlay of both data sets, and (3) an automatic way where the optimization is iterated while adapting the transition matrix until the difference of the intersection areas between both data sets before and after the generalization is minimized. As underlying aggregation procedure we use an approach based on global combinatorial optimization. We tested our approach for two German topographic data sets of different origin, which are given in the same areal extent and were acquired at scales 1:1000 and 1:25,000, respectively. The evaluation of our results allows us to conclude that our method is promising for the derivation of transition matrices from map samples. In the discussion we describe the advantages and disadvantages and show options for future work.

AB - The goal of the research described in this article is to derive parameters necessary for the automatic generalization of land-cover maps. A digital land-cover map is often given as a partition of the plane into areas of different classes. Generalizing such maps is usually done by aggregating small areas into larger regions. This can be modelled using cost functions in an optimization process, where a major objective is to minimize the class changes. Thus, an important input parameter for the aggregation is the information about possible aggregation partners of individual object classes. This can be coded in terms of a transition matrix listing costs that are charged for changing a unit area from one class into another one. In our case we consider the problem of determining the transition matrix based on two data sets of different scales. We propose three options to solve the problem: (1) the conventional way where an expert defines manually the transition matrix, (2) to derive the transition matrix from an analysis of an overlay of both data sets, and (3) an automatic way where the optimization is iterated while adapting the transition matrix until the difference of the intersection areas between both data sets before and after the generalization is minimized. As underlying aggregation procedure we use an approach based on global combinatorial optimization. We tested our approach for two German topographic data sets of different origin, which are given in the same areal extent and were acquired at scales 1:1000 and 1:25,000, respectively. The evaluation of our results allows us to conclude that our method is promising for the derivation of transition matrices from map samples. In the discussion we describe the advantages and disadvantages and show options for future work.

KW - Aggregation

KW - Generalization

KW - Knowledge acquisition

KW - Multi-scale representation

KW - Optimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948736718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19475680903464639

DO - 10.1080/19475680903464639

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84948736718

VL - 15

SP - 107

EP - 116

JO - Annals of GIS

JF - Annals of GIS

SN - 1947-5683

IS - 2

ER -

By the same author(s)