Density Functional Theory for Microwave Spectroscopy of Noncovalent Complexes: A Benchmark Study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • P. Kraus
  • I. Frank
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4894-4901
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry A
Volume122
Issue number21
Early online date11 May 2018
Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2018

Abstract

In this work, we compare the results obtained with 89 computational methods for predicting noncovalent bond lengths in weakly bound complexes. Evaluations for the performance in noncovalent interaction energies and covalent bond lengths obtained from five other data sets are included. The overall best performing density functional is the ωB97M-V method, achieving balanced results across all three categories. For noncovalent geometries, the best methods include B97M-V, B3LYP-D3(BJ) and DSD-PBEPBE-D3(BJ). The effects of systematic improvement of the density functional approximation and of dispersion corrections are also discussed.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Density Functional Theory for Microwave Spectroscopy of Noncovalent Complexes: A Benchmark Study. / Kraus, P.; Frank, I.
In: Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Vol. 122, No. 21, 31.05.2018, p. 4894-4901.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Kraus P, Frank I. Density Functional Theory for Microwave Spectroscopy of Noncovalent Complexes: A Benchmark Study. Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2018 May 31;122(21):4894-4901. Epub 2018 May 11. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b03345
Download
@article{cd1bc05bfdd94f8caac10bc442918ca5,
title = "Density Functional Theory for Microwave Spectroscopy of Noncovalent Complexes: A Benchmark Study",
abstract = "In this work, we compare the results obtained with 89 computational methods for predicting noncovalent bond lengths in weakly bound complexes. Evaluations for the performance in noncovalent interaction energies and covalent bond lengths obtained from five other data sets are included. The overall best performing density functional is the ωB97M-V method, achieving balanced results across all three categories. For noncovalent geometries, the best methods include B97M-V, B3LYP-D3(BJ) and DSD-PBEPBE-D3(BJ). The effects of systematic improvement of the density functional approximation and of dispersion corrections are also discussed.",
author = "P. Kraus and I. Frank",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 American Chemical Society. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
month = may,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1021/acs.jpca.8b03345",
language = "English",
volume = "122",
pages = "4894--4901",
journal = "Journal of Physical Chemistry A",
issn = "1089-5639",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "21",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Density Functional Theory for Microwave Spectroscopy of Noncovalent Complexes

T2 - A Benchmark Study

AU - Kraus, P.

AU - Frank, I.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 American Chemical Society. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2018/5/31

Y1 - 2018/5/31

N2 - In this work, we compare the results obtained with 89 computational methods for predicting noncovalent bond lengths in weakly bound complexes. Evaluations for the performance in noncovalent interaction energies and covalent bond lengths obtained from five other data sets are included. The overall best performing density functional is the ωB97M-V method, achieving balanced results across all three categories. For noncovalent geometries, the best methods include B97M-V, B3LYP-D3(BJ) and DSD-PBEPBE-D3(BJ). The effects of systematic improvement of the density functional approximation and of dispersion corrections are also discussed.

AB - In this work, we compare the results obtained with 89 computational methods for predicting noncovalent bond lengths in weakly bound complexes. Evaluations for the performance in noncovalent interaction energies and covalent bond lengths obtained from five other data sets are included. The overall best performing density functional is the ωB97M-V method, achieving balanced results across all three categories. For noncovalent geometries, the best methods include B97M-V, B3LYP-D3(BJ) and DSD-PBEPBE-D3(BJ). The effects of systematic improvement of the density functional approximation and of dispersion corrections are also discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047077088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b03345

DO - 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b03345

M3 - Article

C2 - 29750513

AN - SCOPUS:85047077088

VL - 122

SP - 4894

EP - 4901

JO - Journal of Physical Chemistry A

JF - Journal of Physical Chemistry A

SN - 1089-5639

IS - 21

ER -