Dam risk assessment based on univariate versus bivariate statistical approaches: a case study for Argentina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Ana Claudia Callau Poduje
  • Aslan Belli
  • Uwe Haberlandt
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2216-2232
Number of pages17
JournalHydrological sciences journal
Volume59
Issue number12
Early online date24 Oct 2014
Publication statusPublished - 2 Dec 2014

Abstract

Considering floods as multivariate events allows a better statistical representation of their complexity. In this work the relevance of multivariate analysis of floods for designing or assessing the safety of hydraulic structures is discussed. A flood event is characterized by its peak flow and volume. The dependence between the variables is modelled with a copula. One thousand random pairs of variables are transformed to hydrographs, applying the Beta distribution function. Synthetic floods are routed through a reservoir to assess the risk of overtopping a dam. The resulting maximum water levels are compared to estimations considering the peak flow and volume separately. The analysis is performed using daily flows observed in the River Agrio in Neuquén Province, Argentina, a catchment area of 7300 km2. The bivariate approach results in higher maximum water level values. Therefore the multivariate approach should be preferred for the estimation of design variables.

Keywords

    copula, dam risk assessment, flood frequency, synthetic hydrograph

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Dam risk assessment based on univariate versus bivariate statistical approaches: a case study for Argentina. / Callau Poduje, Ana Claudia; Belli, Aslan; Haberlandt, Uwe.
In: Hydrological sciences journal, Vol. 59, No. 12, 02.12.2014, p. 2216-2232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Callau Poduje AC, Belli A, Haberlandt U. Dam risk assessment based on univariate versus bivariate statistical approaches: a case study for Argentina. Hydrological sciences journal. 2014 Dec 2;59(12):2216-2232. Epub 2014 Oct 24. doi: 10.1080/02626667.2013.871014
Callau Poduje, Ana Claudia ; Belli, Aslan ; Haberlandt, Uwe. / Dam risk assessment based on univariate versus bivariate statistical approaches : a case study for Argentina. In: Hydrological sciences journal. 2014 ; Vol. 59, No. 12. pp. 2216-2232.
Download
@article{404578c0149543c1929349a24a426692,
title = "Dam risk assessment based on univariate versus bivariate statistical approaches: a case study for Argentina",
abstract = "Considering floods as multivariate events allows a better statistical representation of their complexity. In this work the relevance of multivariate analysis of floods for designing or assessing the safety of hydraulic structures is discussed. A flood event is characterized by its peak flow and volume. The dependence between the variables is modelled with a copula. One thousand random pairs of variables are transformed to hydrographs, applying the Beta distribution function. Synthetic floods are routed through a reservoir to assess the risk of overtopping a dam. The resulting maximum water levels are compared to estimations considering the peak flow and volume separately. The analysis is performed using daily flows observed in the River Agrio in Neuqu{\'e}n Province, Argentina, a catchment area of 7300 km2. The bivariate approach results in higher maximum water level values. Therefore the multivariate approach should be preferred for the estimation of design variables.",
keywords = "copula, dam risk assessment, flood frequency, synthetic hydrograph",
author = "{Callau Poduje}, {Ana Claudia} and Aslan Belli and Uwe Haberlandt",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2014 IAHS Press.",
year = "2014",
month = dec,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/02626667.2013.871014",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "2216--2232",
journal = "Hydrological sciences journal",
issn = "0262-6667",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "12",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dam risk assessment based on univariate versus bivariate statistical approaches

T2 - a case study for Argentina

AU - Callau Poduje, Ana Claudia

AU - Belli, Aslan

AU - Haberlandt, Uwe

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2014 IAHS Press.

PY - 2014/12/2

Y1 - 2014/12/2

N2 - Considering floods as multivariate events allows a better statistical representation of their complexity. In this work the relevance of multivariate analysis of floods for designing or assessing the safety of hydraulic structures is discussed. A flood event is characterized by its peak flow and volume. The dependence between the variables is modelled with a copula. One thousand random pairs of variables are transformed to hydrographs, applying the Beta distribution function. Synthetic floods are routed through a reservoir to assess the risk of overtopping a dam. The resulting maximum water levels are compared to estimations considering the peak flow and volume separately. The analysis is performed using daily flows observed in the River Agrio in Neuquén Province, Argentina, a catchment area of 7300 km2. The bivariate approach results in higher maximum water level values. Therefore the multivariate approach should be preferred for the estimation of design variables.

AB - Considering floods as multivariate events allows a better statistical representation of their complexity. In this work the relevance of multivariate analysis of floods for designing or assessing the safety of hydraulic structures is discussed. A flood event is characterized by its peak flow and volume. The dependence between the variables is modelled with a copula. One thousand random pairs of variables are transformed to hydrographs, applying the Beta distribution function. Synthetic floods are routed through a reservoir to assess the risk of overtopping a dam. The resulting maximum water levels are compared to estimations considering the peak flow and volume separately. The analysis is performed using daily flows observed in the River Agrio in Neuquén Province, Argentina, a catchment area of 7300 km2. The bivariate approach results in higher maximum water level values. Therefore the multivariate approach should be preferred for the estimation of design variables.

KW - copula

KW - dam risk assessment

KW - flood frequency

KW - synthetic hydrograph

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84910151968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02626667.2013.871014

DO - 10.1080/02626667.2013.871014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84910151968

VL - 59

SP - 2216

EP - 2232

JO - Hydrological sciences journal

JF - Hydrological sciences journal

SN - 0262-6667

IS - 12

ER -