Core decompression and osteonecrosis intervention rod in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Clinical outcome and finite element analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Thilo Floerkemeier
  • André Lutz
  • Udo Nackenhorst
  • Fritz Thorey
  • Hazibullah Waizy
  • Henning Windhagen
  • Gabriela Von Lewinski

External Research Organisations

  • Hannover Medical School (MHH)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1461-1466
Number of pages6
JournalInternational orthopaedics
Volume35
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011

Abstract

The osteonecrosis of the femoral head implies significant disability partly due to pain. After conventional core decompression using a 10-mm drill, patients normally are requested to be non-weight bearing for several weeks due to the risk of fracture. After core decompression using multiple small drillings, patients were allowed 50% weight bearing. The alternative of simultaneous implantation of a tantalum implant has the supposed advantage of unrestricted load bearing postoperatively. However, these recommendations are mainly based on clinical experience. The aim of this study was to perform a finite element analysis and confirm the results by clinical data after core decompression and after treatment using a tantalum implant. Postoperatively, the risk of fracture is lower after core decompression using multiple small drillings and after the implantation of a tantalum rod according to finite element analysis compared to core decompression of one 10-mm drill hole. According to the results of this study, a risk of fracture exists only during extreme loading. The long-term results reveal a superior performance for core decompression presumably due to the lack of complete bone ingrowth of the tantalum implant. In conclusion, core decompression using small drill holes seems to be superior compared to the tantalum implant and to conventional core decompression.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Core decompression and osteonecrosis intervention rod in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Clinical outcome and finite element analysis. / Floerkemeier, Thilo; Lutz, André; Nackenhorst, Udo et al.
In: International orthopaedics, Vol. 35, No. 10, 10.2011, p. 1461-1466.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Floerkemeier T, Lutz A, Nackenhorst U, Thorey F, Waizy H, Windhagen H et al. Core decompression and osteonecrosis intervention rod in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Clinical outcome and finite element analysis. International orthopaedics. 2011 Oct;35(10):1461-1466. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1138-x
Download
@article{822f964a9bff4441a997645d6f98bce8,
title = "Core decompression and osteonecrosis intervention rod in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Clinical outcome and finite element analysis",
abstract = "The osteonecrosis of the femoral head implies significant disability partly due to pain. After conventional core decompression using a 10-mm drill, patients normally are requested to be non-weight bearing for several weeks due to the risk of fracture. After core decompression using multiple small drillings, patients were allowed 50% weight bearing. The alternative of simultaneous implantation of a tantalum implant has the supposed advantage of unrestricted load bearing postoperatively. However, these recommendations are mainly based on clinical experience. The aim of this study was to perform a finite element analysis and confirm the results by clinical data after core decompression and after treatment using a tantalum implant. Postoperatively, the risk of fracture is lower after core decompression using multiple small drillings and after the implantation of a tantalum rod according to finite element analysis compared to core decompression of one 10-mm drill hole. According to the results of this study, a risk of fracture exists only during extreme loading. The long-term results reveal a superior performance for core decompression presumably due to the lack of complete bone ingrowth of the tantalum implant. In conclusion, core decompression using small drill holes seems to be superior compared to the tantalum implant and to conventional core decompression.",
author = "Thilo Floerkemeier and Andr{\'e} Lutz and Udo Nackenhorst and Fritz Thorey and Hazibullah Waizy and Henning Windhagen and {Von Lewinski}, Gabriela",
year = "2011",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1007/s00264-010-1138-x",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "1461--1466",
journal = "International orthopaedics",
issn = "0341-2695",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "10",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Core decompression and osteonecrosis intervention rod in osteonecrosis of the femoral head

T2 - Clinical outcome and finite element analysis

AU - Floerkemeier, Thilo

AU - Lutz, André

AU - Nackenhorst, Udo

AU - Thorey, Fritz

AU - Waizy, Hazibullah

AU - Windhagen, Henning

AU - Von Lewinski, Gabriela

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - The osteonecrosis of the femoral head implies significant disability partly due to pain. After conventional core decompression using a 10-mm drill, patients normally are requested to be non-weight bearing for several weeks due to the risk of fracture. After core decompression using multiple small drillings, patients were allowed 50% weight bearing. The alternative of simultaneous implantation of a tantalum implant has the supposed advantage of unrestricted load bearing postoperatively. However, these recommendations are mainly based on clinical experience. The aim of this study was to perform a finite element analysis and confirm the results by clinical data after core decompression and after treatment using a tantalum implant. Postoperatively, the risk of fracture is lower after core decompression using multiple small drillings and after the implantation of a tantalum rod according to finite element analysis compared to core decompression of one 10-mm drill hole. According to the results of this study, a risk of fracture exists only during extreme loading. The long-term results reveal a superior performance for core decompression presumably due to the lack of complete bone ingrowth of the tantalum implant. In conclusion, core decompression using small drill holes seems to be superior compared to the tantalum implant and to conventional core decompression.

AB - The osteonecrosis of the femoral head implies significant disability partly due to pain. After conventional core decompression using a 10-mm drill, patients normally are requested to be non-weight bearing for several weeks due to the risk of fracture. After core decompression using multiple small drillings, patients were allowed 50% weight bearing. The alternative of simultaneous implantation of a tantalum implant has the supposed advantage of unrestricted load bearing postoperatively. However, these recommendations are mainly based on clinical experience. The aim of this study was to perform a finite element analysis and confirm the results by clinical data after core decompression and after treatment using a tantalum implant. Postoperatively, the risk of fracture is lower after core decompression using multiple small drillings and after the implantation of a tantalum rod according to finite element analysis compared to core decompression of one 10-mm drill hole. According to the results of this study, a risk of fracture exists only during extreme loading. The long-term results reveal a superior performance for core decompression presumably due to the lack of complete bone ingrowth of the tantalum implant. In conclusion, core decompression using small drill holes seems to be superior compared to the tantalum implant and to conventional core decompression.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80755125617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00264-010-1138-x

DO - 10.1007/s00264-010-1138-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 20972787

AN - SCOPUS:80755125617

VL - 35

SP - 1461

EP - 1466

JO - International orthopaedics

JF - International orthopaedics

SN - 0341-2695

IS - 10

ER -

By the same author(s)