Confocal Raman microscopy and fluorescent in situ hybridization: A complementary approach for biofilm analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleTransferpeer review

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)112-118
Number of pages7
JournalCHEMOSPHERE
Volume161
Early online date13 Jul 2016
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2016

Abstract

We combine confocal Raman microscopy (CRM) of wet samples with subsequent Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) without significant limitations to either technique for analyzing the same sample of a microbial community on a cell-to-cell basis. This combination of techniques allows a much deeper, more complete understanding of complex environmental samples than provided by either technique alone. The minimalistic approach is based on laboratory glassware with micro-engravings for reproducible localization of the sample at cell scale combined with a fixation and de- and rehydration protocol for the respective techniques. As proof of concept, we analyzed a floc of nitrifying activated sludge, demonstrating that the sample can be tracked with cell-scale precision over different measurements and instruments. The collected information includes the microbial content, spatial shape, variant chemical compositions of the floc matrix and the mineral microparticles embedded within. In addition, the direct comparison of CRM and FISH revealed a difference in reported cell size due to the different cell components targeted by the respective technique. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a direct cell-to-cell comparison of confocal Raman microscopy and Fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis performed on the same sample. An adaptation of the method to include native samples as a starting point is planned for the near future. The micro-engraving approach itself also opens up the possibility of combining other, functionally incompatible techniques as required for further in-depth investigations of low-volume samples.

Keywords

    Biofilms, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Confocal, Sewage, Spectrum Analysis, Raman, Activated sludge, Confocal Raman microscopy, Ammonium oxidizing bacteria, Imaging, Biofilm, FISH

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Confocal Raman microscopy and fluorescent in situ hybridization: A complementary approach for biofilm analysis. / Kniggendorf, Ann-Kathrin; Nogueira, Regina; Kelb, Christian et al.
In: CHEMOSPHERE, Vol. 161, 10.2016, p. 112-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleTransferpeer review

Kniggendorf AK, Nogueira R, Kelb C, Schadzek P, Meinhardt-Wollweber M, Ngezahayo A et al. Confocal Raman microscopy and fluorescent in situ hybridization: A complementary approach for biofilm analysis. CHEMOSPHERE. 2016 Oct;161:112-118. Epub 2016 Jul 13. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.06.096
Download
@article{22bebedef21245a595a7af2889439511,
title = "Confocal Raman microscopy and fluorescent in situ hybridization: A complementary approach for biofilm analysis",
abstract = "We combine confocal Raman microscopy (CRM) of wet samples with subsequent Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) without significant limitations to either technique for analyzing the same sample of a microbial community on a cell-to-cell basis. This combination of techniques allows a much deeper, more complete understanding of complex environmental samples than provided by either technique alone. The minimalistic approach is based on laboratory glassware with micro-engravings for reproducible localization of the sample at cell scale combined with a fixation and de- and rehydration protocol for the respective techniques. As proof of concept, we analyzed a floc of nitrifying activated sludge, demonstrating that the sample can be tracked with cell-scale precision over different measurements and instruments. The collected information includes the microbial content, spatial shape, variant chemical compositions of the floc matrix and the mineral microparticles embedded within. In addition, the direct comparison of CRM and FISH revealed a difference in reported cell size due to the different cell components targeted by the respective technique. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a direct cell-to-cell comparison of confocal Raman microscopy and Fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis performed on the same sample. An adaptation of the method to include native samples as a starting point is planned for the near future. The micro-engraving approach itself also opens up the possibility of combining other, functionally incompatible techniques as required for further in-depth investigations of low-volume samples. ",
keywords = "Biofilms, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Confocal, Sewage, Spectrum Analysis, Raman, Activated sludge, Confocal Raman microscopy, Ammonium oxidizing bacteria, Imaging, Biofilm, FISH",
author = "Ann-Kathrin Kniggendorf and Regina Nogueira and Christian Kelb and Patrik Schadzek and Merve Meinhardt-Wollweber and Anaclet Ngezahayo and Bernhard Roth",
year = "2016",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.06.096",
language = "English",
volume = "161",
pages = "112--118",
journal = "CHEMOSPHERE",
issn = "0045-6535",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confocal Raman microscopy and fluorescent in situ hybridization

T2 - A complementary approach for biofilm analysis

AU - Kniggendorf, Ann-Kathrin

AU - Nogueira, Regina

AU - Kelb, Christian

AU - Schadzek, Patrik

AU - Meinhardt-Wollweber, Merve

AU - Ngezahayo, Anaclet

AU - Roth, Bernhard

PY - 2016/10

Y1 - 2016/10

N2 - We combine confocal Raman microscopy (CRM) of wet samples with subsequent Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) without significant limitations to either technique for analyzing the same sample of a microbial community on a cell-to-cell basis. This combination of techniques allows a much deeper, more complete understanding of complex environmental samples than provided by either technique alone. The minimalistic approach is based on laboratory glassware with micro-engravings for reproducible localization of the sample at cell scale combined with a fixation and de- and rehydration protocol for the respective techniques. As proof of concept, we analyzed a floc of nitrifying activated sludge, demonstrating that the sample can be tracked with cell-scale precision over different measurements and instruments. The collected information includes the microbial content, spatial shape, variant chemical compositions of the floc matrix and the mineral microparticles embedded within. In addition, the direct comparison of CRM and FISH revealed a difference in reported cell size due to the different cell components targeted by the respective technique. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a direct cell-to-cell comparison of confocal Raman microscopy and Fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis performed on the same sample. An adaptation of the method to include native samples as a starting point is planned for the near future. The micro-engraving approach itself also opens up the possibility of combining other, functionally incompatible techniques as required for further in-depth investigations of low-volume samples.

AB - We combine confocal Raman microscopy (CRM) of wet samples with subsequent Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) without significant limitations to either technique for analyzing the same sample of a microbial community on a cell-to-cell basis. This combination of techniques allows a much deeper, more complete understanding of complex environmental samples than provided by either technique alone. The minimalistic approach is based on laboratory glassware with micro-engravings for reproducible localization of the sample at cell scale combined with a fixation and de- and rehydration protocol for the respective techniques. As proof of concept, we analyzed a floc of nitrifying activated sludge, demonstrating that the sample can be tracked with cell-scale precision over different measurements and instruments. The collected information includes the microbial content, spatial shape, variant chemical compositions of the floc matrix and the mineral microparticles embedded within. In addition, the direct comparison of CRM and FISH revealed a difference in reported cell size due to the different cell components targeted by the respective technique. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a direct cell-to-cell comparison of confocal Raman microscopy and Fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis performed on the same sample. An adaptation of the method to include native samples as a starting point is planned for the near future. The micro-engraving approach itself also opens up the possibility of combining other, functionally incompatible techniques as required for further in-depth investigations of low-volume samples.

KW - Biofilms

KW - In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence

KW - Microscopy, Confocal

KW - Sewage

KW - Spectrum Analysis, Raman

KW - Activated sludge

KW - Confocal Raman microscopy

KW - Ammonium oxidizing bacteria

KW - Imaging

KW - Biofilm

KW - FISH

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978197366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.06.096

DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.06.096

M3 - Article

C2 - 27423128

VL - 161

SP - 112

EP - 118

JO - CHEMOSPHERE

JF - CHEMOSPHERE

SN - 0045-6535

ER -

By the same author(s)