Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | A Window on the Future of Geodesy |
| Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of the International Association of Geodesy IAG General Assembly Sapporo, Japan June 30 – July 11, 2003 |
| Editors | Fernando Sansò |
| Publisher | Springer Verlag |
| Pages | 248-253 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| ISBN (print) | 9783540240556 |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
| Event | International Association of Geodesy, IAG 2003 - Sapporo, Japan Duration: 30 Jun 2003 → 11 Jul 2003 |
Publication series
| Name | International Association of Geodesy Symposia |
|---|---|
| Volume | 128 |
| ISSN (Print) | 0939-9585 |
| ISSN (electronic) | 2197-9359 |
Abstract
Various institutions have collected shipborne gravimetric measurements during the last decades. Due to different standards used for the processing of the observations and the necessary corrections, significant inconsistencies exist between different cruises. This contribution aims at producing a consistent marine gravity data set surrounding Europe, which can then be used for high precision geoid modelling, dynamic sea surface topography estimation, and other applications. Besides our own marine gravity data holdings, data were collected from the Bureau Gravimetrique International (BGI), the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA, formerly DMA), and the National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC). The area of investigation is spanning the latitudes from 10 °N to 90 °N and the longitudes from 60 °W to 60 °E. The quality of the data varies between the individual cruises, as they originate from many projects at different epochs. Hence, systematic errors are likely to exist. Such errors can be significantly reduced by a crossover adjustment of the individual ship tracks. Because the track information was not available for all cruises, it had to be regenerated by different procedures. Furthermore, duplicate sources were removed before the crossover adjustment. The crossover adjustment is based on a bias per track error model. The adjustment of about 1.5 million observations in nearly 17,000 tracks led to a consistent high quality marine gravity data set. The RMS of the about 80,000 crossover differences is 15.5 mgal for the original data set, 8.4mgal for an edited data set, and 4.7 mgal for the final crossover adjusted data set. The second part of this contribution describes the evaluation of the marine gravity data set by altimeter derived gravity anomalies from different sources. These comparisons also prove the effectiveness of the crossover adjustment.
Keywords
- Altimetric gravity anomalies, Crossover adjustment, Shipborne gravity observations
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- Computers in Earth Sciences
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- Geophysics
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
A Window on the Future of Geodesy : Proceedings of the International Association of Geodesy IAG General Assembly Sapporo, Japan June 30 – July 11, 2003. ed. / Fernando Sansò. Springer Verlag, 2005. p. 248-253 (International Association of Geodesy Symposia; Vol. 128).
Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Research › peer review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Compilation and Evaluation of a Consistent Marine Gravity Data Set Surrounding Europe
AU - Denker, Heiner
AU - Roland, Markus
N1 - Funding Information: We thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for sponsoring this research under project DE 459/5-1/2, and we are grateful to the Bureau Gravim?trique International (BGI), the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA), and the National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) for providing marine gravity data to us Publisher Copyright: © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Various institutions have collected shipborne gravimetric measurements during the last decades. Due to different standards used for the processing of the observations and the necessary corrections, significant inconsistencies exist between different cruises. This contribution aims at producing a consistent marine gravity data set surrounding Europe, which can then be used for high precision geoid modelling, dynamic sea surface topography estimation, and other applications. Besides our own marine gravity data holdings, data were collected from the Bureau Gravimetrique International (BGI), the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA, formerly DMA), and the National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC). The area of investigation is spanning the latitudes from 10 °N to 90 °N and the longitudes from 60 °W to 60 °E. The quality of the data varies between the individual cruises, as they originate from many projects at different epochs. Hence, systematic errors are likely to exist. Such errors can be significantly reduced by a crossover adjustment of the individual ship tracks. Because the track information was not available for all cruises, it had to be regenerated by different procedures. Furthermore, duplicate sources were removed before the crossover adjustment. The crossover adjustment is based on a bias per track error model. The adjustment of about 1.5 million observations in nearly 17,000 tracks led to a consistent high quality marine gravity data set. The RMS of the about 80,000 crossover differences is 15.5 mgal for the original data set, 8.4mgal for an edited data set, and 4.7 mgal for the final crossover adjusted data set. The second part of this contribution describes the evaluation of the marine gravity data set by altimeter derived gravity anomalies from different sources. These comparisons also prove the effectiveness of the crossover adjustment.
AB - Various institutions have collected shipborne gravimetric measurements during the last decades. Due to different standards used for the processing of the observations and the necessary corrections, significant inconsistencies exist between different cruises. This contribution aims at producing a consistent marine gravity data set surrounding Europe, which can then be used for high precision geoid modelling, dynamic sea surface topography estimation, and other applications. Besides our own marine gravity data holdings, data were collected from the Bureau Gravimetrique International (BGI), the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA, formerly DMA), and the National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC). The area of investigation is spanning the latitudes from 10 °N to 90 °N and the longitudes from 60 °W to 60 °E. The quality of the data varies between the individual cruises, as they originate from many projects at different epochs. Hence, systematic errors are likely to exist. Such errors can be significantly reduced by a crossover adjustment of the individual ship tracks. Because the track information was not available for all cruises, it had to be regenerated by different procedures. Furthermore, duplicate sources were removed before the crossover adjustment. The crossover adjustment is based on a bias per track error model. The adjustment of about 1.5 million observations in nearly 17,000 tracks led to a consistent high quality marine gravity data set. The RMS of the about 80,000 crossover differences is 15.5 mgal for the original data set, 8.4mgal for an edited data set, and 4.7 mgal for the final crossover adjusted data set. The second part of this contribution describes the evaluation of the marine gravity data set by altimeter derived gravity anomalies from different sources. These comparisons also prove the effectiveness of the crossover adjustment.
KW - Altimetric gravity anomalies
KW - Crossover adjustment
KW - Shipborne gravity observations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964053928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/3-540-27432-4_42
DO - 10.1007/3-540-27432-4_42
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84964053928
SN - 9783540240556
T3 - International Association of Geodesy Symposia
SP - 248
EP - 253
BT - A Window on the Future of Geodesy
A2 - Sansò, Fernando
PB - Springer Verlag
T2 - International Association of Geodesy, IAG 2003
Y2 - 30 June 2003 through 11 July 2003
ER -