Compensation of stochastic time-continuous perturbations during walking in healthy young adults: An analysis of the structure of gait variability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena
  • Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-259
Number of pages7
JournalGait and Posture
Volume80
Early online date28 May 2020
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2020

Abstract

Background: During everyday locomotion, we cope with various internal or external perturbations (e.g. uneven surface). Uncertainty exists on how unpredictable external perturbations increase noise within the motor system and if they are compensated by employing covariation of the limb joints or rather due to decreased sensitivity of an altered posture. Research question: Do continuous stochastic perturbations affect the structure of gait variability in young and healthy adults? Methods: In a cross-over study, gait kinematics of 21 healthy young sports students were registered during treadmill walking with and without continuous stochastic perturbations. Using the TNC method, the following aspects were analyzed: (a) the sensitivity of body posture to perturbations (‘tolerance’) decreasing gait variability, (b) the unstructured motor ‘noise’ increasing gait variability and (c) the amount of ‘covariation’ of the limb joints. Results: Compared to normal walking, gait variability was significantly increased (p < .001) during walking with perturbations. The negative effect of noise was partly compensated by improved ‘covariation’ of leg joints (p < .001). The aspect ‘tolerance’ had a small effect on increasing gait variability during stance phase (p < .001) and decreasing gait variability during swing phase (p < .001). Significance: Increased motor noise due to external perturbations is partly compensated by improved covariation of the limb joints. However, the effect of an altered posture slightly affects gait variability. Further studies should focus on different populations (e.g. older participants) to see if they use the same mechanism (improved covariation) to compensate for stochastic perturbations.

Keywords

    Gait stability, Gait variability, Minimum toe clearance, Stochastic perturbations, TNC

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Compensation of stochastic time-continuous perturbations during walking in healthy young adults: An analysis of the structure of gait variability. / Koch, Monique; Eckardt, Nils; Zech, Astrid et al.
In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 80, 07.2020, p. 253-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{1bc1c135aa574b66b2297be09a9cc112,
title = "Compensation of stochastic time-continuous perturbations during walking in healthy young adults: An analysis of the structure of gait variability",
abstract = "Background: During everyday locomotion, we cope with various internal or external perturbations (e.g. uneven surface). Uncertainty exists on how unpredictable external perturbations increase noise within the motor system and if they are compensated by employing covariation of the limb joints or rather due to decreased sensitivity of an altered posture. Research question: Do continuous stochastic perturbations affect the structure of gait variability in young and healthy adults? Methods: In a cross-over study, gait kinematics of 21 healthy young sports students were registered during treadmill walking with and without continuous stochastic perturbations. Using the TNC method, the following aspects were analyzed: (a) the sensitivity of body posture to perturbations ({\textquoteleft}tolerance{\textquoteright}) decreasing gait variability, (b) the unstructured motor {\textquoteleft}noise{\textquoteright} increasing gait variability and (c) the amount of {\textquoteleft}covariation{\textquoteright} of the limb joints. Results: Compared to normal walking, gait variability was significantly increased (p < .001) during walking with perturbations. The negative effect of noise was partly compensated by improved {\textquoteleft}covariation{\textquoteright} of leg joints (p < .001). The aspect {\textquoteleft}tolerance{\textquoteright} had a small effect on increasing gait variability during stance phase (p < .001) and decreasing gait variability during swing phase (p < .001). Significance: Increased motor noise due to external perturbations is partly compensated by improved covariation of the limb joints. However, the effect of an altered posture slightly affects gait variability. Further studies should focus on different populations (e.g. older participants) to see if they use the same mechanism (improved covariation) to compensate for stochastic perturbations.",
keywords = "Gait stability, Gait variability, Minimum toe clearance, Stochastic perturbations, TNC",
author = "Monique Koch and Nils Eckardt and Astrid Zech and Daniel Hamacher",
year = "2020",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.05.040",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "253--259",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Compensation of stochastic time-continuous perturbations during walking in healthy young adults

T2 - An analysis of the structure of gait variability

AU - Koch, Monique

AU - Eckardt, Nils

AU - Zech, Astrid

AU - Hamacher, Daniel

PY - 2020/7

Y1 - 2020/7

N2 - Background: During everyday locomotion, we cope with various internal or external perturbations (e.g. uneven surface). Uncertainty exists on how unpredictable external perturbations increase noise within the motor system and if they are compensated by employing covariation of the limb joints or rather due to decreased sensitivity of an altered posture. Research question: Do continuous stochastic perturbations affect the structure of gait variability in young and healthy adults? Methods: In a cross-over study, gait kinematics of 21 healthy young sports students were registered during treadmill walking with and without continuous stochastic perturbations. Using the TNC method, the following aspects were analyzed: (a) the sensitivity of body posture to perturbations (‘tolerance’) decreasing gait variability, (b) the unstructured motor ‘noise’ increasing gait variability and (c) the amount of ‘covariation’ of the limb joints. Results: Compared to normal walking, gait variability was significantly increased (p < .001) during walking with perturbations. The negative effect of noise was partly compensated by improved ‘covariation’ of leg joints (p < .001). The aspect ‘tolerance’ had a small effect on increasing gait variability during stance phase (p < .001) and decreasing gait variability during swing phase (p < .001). Significance: Increased motor noise due to external perturbations is partly compensated by improved covariation of the limb joints. However, the effect of an altered posture slightly affects gait variability. Further studies should focus on different populations (e.g. older participants) to see if they use the same mechanism (improved covariation) to compensate for stochastic perturbations.

AB - Background: During everyday locomotion, we cope with various internal or external perturbations (e.g. uneven surface). Uncertainty exists on how unpredictable external perturbations increase noise within the motor system and if they are compensated by employing covariation of the limb joints or rather due to decreased sensitivity of an altered posture. Research question: Do continuous stochastic perturbations affect the structure of gait variability in young and healthy adults? Methods: In a cross-over study, gait kinematics of 21 healthy young sports students were registered during treadmill walking with and without continuous stochastic perturbations. Using the TNC method, the following aspects were analyzed: (a) the sensitivity of body posture to perturbations (‘tolerance’) decreasing gait variability, (b) the unstructured motor ‘noise’ increasing gait variability and (c) the amount of ‘covariation’ of the limb joints. Results: Compared to normal walking, gait variability was significantly increased (p < .001) during walking with perturbations. The negative effect of noise was partly compensated by improved ‘covariation’ of leg joints (p < .001). The aspect ‘tolerance’ had a small effect on increasing gait variability during stance phase (p < .001) and decreasing gait variability during swing phase (p < .001). Significance: Increased motor noise due to external perturbations is partly compensated by improved covariation of the limb joints. However, the effect of an altered posture slightly affects gait variability. Further studies should focus on different populations (e.g. older participants) to see if they use the same mechanism (improved covariation) to compensate for stochastic perturbations.

KW - Gait stability

KW - Gait variability

KW - Minimum toe clearance

KW - Stochastic perturbations

KW - TNC

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086462345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.05.040

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.05.040

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85086462345

VL - 80

SP - 253

EP - 259

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

ER -

By the same author(s)