Comparison of spatial ion distributions from different ionization sources

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-29
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal for Ion Mobility Spectrometry
Volume22
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2018

Abstract

In order to optimize an ion mobility spectrometer (IMS) with respect to resolving power and sensitivity, the exact spatial ion density distribution generated by the used ionization source is of major interest. In this work, we investigate the two-dimensional (2D) spatial ion density distribution generated by a 63 Ni source and the three-dimensional (3D) spatial ion density distributions generated by a radioactive 3 H electron source, our non-radioactive electron source and an X-ray source. Therefore, we used an experimental setup consisting of the ionization source under investigation, an ionization region, a 5 mm short drift tube and a PCB Faraday detector segmented into stripe electrodes to measure the ion current. Repeating this measurement for different detector angles, the resulting 3D spatial ion density distribution can be calculated by image reconstruction. Furthermore, we varied the kinetic electron energy of our non-radioactive electron source in order to validate the simulated ion density distribution shown in previous work.

Keywords

    APCI, Ion distribution, Ion generation, Ion profiles, Non-radioactive electron source, Spatial ion density distribution, Tritium source, X-ray-source

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Comparison of spatial ion distributions from different ionization sources. / Bunert, Erik; Kirk, Ansgar T.; Käbein, Oliver et al.
In: International Journal for Ion Mobility Spectrometry, Vol. 22, No. 1, 15.12.2018, p. 21-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Bunert, E, Kirk, AT, Käbein, O & Zimmermann, S 2018, 'Comparison of spatial ion distributions from different ionization sources', International Journal for Ion Mobility Spectrometry, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-018-0241-3
Bunert, E., Kirk, A. T., Käbein, O., & Zimmermann, S. (2018). Comparison of spatial ion distributions from different ionization sources. International Journal for Ion Mobility Spectrometry, 22(1), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-018-0241-3
Bunert E, Kirk AT, Käbein O, Zimmermann S. Comparison of spatial ion distributions from different ionization sources. International Journal for Ion Mobility Spectrometry. 2018 Dec 15;22(1):21-29. doi: 10.1007/s12127-018-0241-3
Bunert, Erik ; Kirk, Ansgar T. ; Käbein, Oliver et al. / Comparison of spatial ion distributions from different ionization sources. In: International Journal for Ion Mobility Spectrometry. 2018 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 21-29.
Download
@article{e92c2a2f7ec44f0dad9e8a5eca9c8ae1,
title = "Comparison of spatial ion distributions from different ionization sources",
abstract = " In order to optimize an ion mobility spectrometer (IMS) with respect to resolving power and sensitivity, the exact spatial ion density distribution generated by the used ionization source is of major interest. In this work, we investigate the two-dimensional (2D) spatial ion density distribution generated by a 63 Ni source and the three-dimensional (3D) spatial ion density distributions generated by a radioactive 3 H electron source, our non-radioactive electron source and an X-ray source. Therefore, we used an experimental setup consisting of the ionization source under investigation, an ionization region, a 5 mm short drift tube and a PCB Faraday detector segmented into stripe electrodes to measure the ion current. Repeating this measurement for different detector angles, the resulting 3D spatial ion density distribution can be calculated by image reconstruction. Furthermore, we varied the kinetic electron energy of our non-radioactive electron source in order to validate the simulated ion density distribution shown in previous work. ",
keywords = "APCI, Ion distribution, Ion generation, Ion profiles, Non-radioactive electron source, Spatial ion density distribution, Tritium source, X-ray-source",
author = "Erik Bunert and Kirk, {Ansgar T.} and Oliver K{\"a}bein and Stefan Zimmermann",
year = "2018",
month = dec,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s12127-018-0241-3",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "21--29",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of spatial ion distributions from different ionization sources

AU - Bunert, Erik

AU - Kirk, Ansgar T.

AU - Käbein, Oliver

AU - Zimmermann, Stefan

PY - 2018/12/15

Y1 - 2018/12/15

N2 - In order to optimize an ion mobility spectrometer (IMS) with respect to resolving power and sensitivity, the exact spatial ion density distribution generated by the used ionization source is of major interest. In this work, we investigate the two-dimensional (2D) spatial ion density distribution generated by a 63 Ni source and the three-dimensional (3D) spatial ion density distributions generated by a radioactive 3 H electron source, our non-radioactive electron source and an X-ray source. Therefore, we used an experimental setup consisting of the ionization source under investigation, an ionization region, a 5 mm short drift tube and a PCB Faraday detector segmented into stripe electrodes to measure the ion current. Repeating this measurement for different detector angles, the resulting 3D spatial ion density distribution can be calculated by image reconstruction. Furthermore, we varied the kinetic electron energy of our non-radioactive electron source in order to validate the simulated ion density distribution shown in previous work.

AB - In order to optimize an ion mobility spectrometer (IMS) with respect to resolving power and sensitivity, the exact spatial ion density distribution generated by the used ionization source is of major interest. In this work, we investigate the two-dimensional (2D) spatial ion density distribution generated by a 63 Ni source and the three-dimensional (3D) spatial ion density distributions generated by a radioactive 3 H electron source, our non-radioactive electron source and an X-ray source. Therefore, we used an experimental setup consisting of the ionization source under investigation, an ionization region, a 5 mm short drift tube and a PCB Faraday detector segmented into stripe electrodes to measure the ion current. Repeating this measurement for different detector angles, the resulting 3D spatial ion density distribution can be calculated by image reconstruction. Furthermore, we varied the kinetic electron energy of our non-radioactive electron source in order to validate the simulated ion density distribution shown in previous work.

KW - APCI

KW - Ion distribution

KW - Ion generation

KW - Ion profiles

KW - Non-radioactive electron source

KW - Spatial ion density distribution

KW - Tritium source

KW - X-ray-source

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058496366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12127-018-0241-3

DO - 10.1007/s12127-018-0241-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85058496366

VL - 22

SP - 21

EP - 29

JO - International Journal for Ion Mobility Spectrometry

JF - International Journal for Ion Mobility Spectrometry

SN - 1435-6163

IS - 1

ER -

By the same author(s)