Comparison of ICP-AlOx and ALD-Al2O3 layers for the rear surface passivation of c-Si solar cells

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • B. Veith
  • T. Dullweber
  • C. Kranz
  • F. Werner
  • N. P. Harder
  • J. Schmidt
  • B. F.P. Roos
  • T. Dippell
  • R. Brendel

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Institute for Solar Energy Research (ISFH)
  • Singulus Technologies AG
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)379-384
Number of pages6
JournalEnergy Procedia
Volume27
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Event2nd International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics, SiliconPV 2012 - Leuven, Belgium
Duration: 3 Apr 20125 Apr 2012

Abstract

The deposition rate of the standard (i.e. sequential) atomic layer deposition (ALD) process is very low compared to the plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition (PECVD) process. Therefore, as a short- and medium-term perspective, PECVD aluminium oxide (AlOx) films might be better suited for the implementation into industrial-type solar cells than ALD-Al 2O3 films. In this paper, we report results achieved with a newly developed PECVD deposition process for AlOx using an inductively coupled plasma (ICP). We compare the results to high-quality ALDAl2O3 films. We examine a stack consisting of a thin AlOx passivation layer and a PECVD silicon nitride (SiNy) capping layer. Surface recombination velocities below 9 cm/s were measured on low-resistivity (1.4 Ωcm) p-type crystalline silicon wafers passivated either by ICP-PECVD-AlOx films or by ALD-Al2O3 films after annealing at 425°C. Both passivation schemes provide an excellent thermal stability during firing at 910°C with SRVs below 12 cm/s for both, Al2O3/SiNy stacks and single Al 2O3 layers. A fixed negative charge of -4×10 12 cm-2 is measured for ICP-AlOx and ALD-Al2O3, whereas the interface state density is higher for the ICP-AlOx layer with values of 11.0×1011 eV-1cm-2 compared to 1.3×1011 eV -1cm-2 for ALD-Al2O3. Implemented into large-area screen-printed PERC solar cells, an independently confirmed efficiency of 20.1% for ICP-AlOx and an efficiency of 19.6% for ALD-Al2O3 are achieved.

Keywords

    Aluminum oxide, Silicon, Solar Cells, Surface passivation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Comparison of ICP-AlOx and ALD-Al2O3 layers for the rear surface passivation of c-Si solar cells. / Veith, B.; Dullweber, T.; Kranz, C. et al.
In: Energy Procedia, Vol. 27, 2012, p. 379-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer review

Veith, B, Dullweber, T, Kranz, C, Werner, F, Harder, NP, Schmidt, J, Roos, BFP, Dippell, T & Brendel, R 2012, 'Comparison of ICP-AlOx and ALD-Al2O3 layers for the rear surface passivation of c-Si solar cells', Energy Procedia, vol. 27, pp. 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.080
Veith, B., Dullweber, T., Kranz, C., Werner, F., Harder, N. P., Schmidt, J., Roos, B. F. P., Dippell, T., & Brendel, R. (2012). Comparison of ICP-AlOx and ALD-Al2O3 layers for the rear surface passivation of c-Si solar cells. Energy Procedia, 27, 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.080
Veith B, Dullweber T, Kranz C, Werner F, Harder NP, Schmidt J et al. Comparison of ICP-AlOx and ALD-Al2O3 layers for the rear surface passivation of c-Si solar cells. Energy Procedia. 2012;27:379-384. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.080
Veith, B. ; Dullweber, T. ; Kranz, C. et al. / Comparison of ICP-AlOx and ALD-Al2O3 layers for the rear surface passivation of c-Si solar cells. In: Energy Procedia. 2012 ; Vol. 27. pp. 379-384.
Download
@article{9e4c1982f9e1454d8e93dac6f89a4f10,
title = "Comparison of ICP-AlOx and ALD-Al2O3 layers for the rear surface passivation of c-Si solar cells",
abstract = "The deposition rate of the standard (i.e. sequential) atomic layer deposition (ALD) process is very low compared to the plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition (PECVD) process. Therefore, as a short- and medium-term perspective, PECVD aluminium oxide (AlOx) films might be better suited for the implementation into industrial-type solar cells than ALD-Al 2O3 films. In this paper, we report results achieved with a newly developed PECVD deposition process for AlOx using an inductively coupled plasma (ICP). We compare the results to high-quality ALDAl2O3 films. We examine a stack consisting of a thin AlOx passivation layer and a PECVD silicon nitride (SiNy) capping layer. Surface recombination velocities below 9 cm/s were measured on low-resistivity (1.4 Ωcm) p-type crystalline silicon wafers passivated either by ICP-PECVD-AlOx films or by ALD-Al2O3 films after annealing at 425°C. Both passivation schemes provide an excellent thermal stability during firing at 910°C with SRVs below 12 cm/s for both, Al2O3/SiNy stacks and single Al 2O3 layers. A fixed negative charge of -4×10 12 cm-2 is measured for ICP-AlOx and ALD-Al2O3, whereas the interface state density is higher for the ICP-AlOx layer with values of 11.0×1011 eV-1cm-2 compared to 1.3×1011 eV -1cm-2 for ALD-Al2O3. Implemented into large-area screen-printed PERC solar cells, an independently confirmed efficiency of 20.1% for ICP-AlOx and an efficiency of 19.6% for ALD-Al2O3 are achieved.",
keywords = "Aluminum oxide, Silicon, Solar Cells, Surface passivation",
author = "B. Veith and T. Dullweber and C. Kranz and F. Werner and Harder, {N. P.} and J. Schmidt and Roos, {B. F.P.} and T. Dippell and R. Brendel",
note = "Funding Information: The authors thank U. Baumann, B. Beier, H. Hannebauer, R. Hesse for solar cell processing. This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) under Contract No. 0325296 in cooperation with Solland Solar Cells BV, SolarWorld Innovations GmbH, SCHOTT Solar AG, RENA GmbH and SINGULUS TECHNOLOGIES AG, which is gratefully acknowledged.; 2nd International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics, SiliconPV 2012 ; Conference date: 03-04-2012 Through 05-04-2012",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.080",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "379--384",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of ICP-AlOx and ALD-Al2O3 layers for the rear surface passivation of c-Si solar cells

AU - Veith, B.

AU - Dullweber, T.

AU - Kranz, C.

AU - Werner, F.

AU - Harder, N. P.

AU - Schmidt, J.

AU - Roos, B. F.P.

AU - Dippell, T.

AU - Brendel, R.

N1 - Funding Information: The authors thank U. Baumann, B. Beier, H. Hannebauer, R. Hesse for solar cell processing. This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) under Contract No. 0325296 in cooperation with Solland Solar Cells BV, SolarWorld Innovations GmbH, SCHOTT Solar AG, RENA GmbH and SINGULUS TECHNOLOGIES AG, which is gratefully acknowledged.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The deposition rate of the standard (i.e. sequential) atomic layer deposition (ALD) process is very low compared to the plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition (PECVD) process. Therefore, as a short- and medium-term perspective, PECVD aluminium oxide (AlOx) films might be better suited for the implementation into industrial-type solar cells than ALD-Al 2O3 films. In this paper, we report results achieved with a newly developed PECVD deposition process for AlOx using an inductively coupled plasma (ICP). We compare the results to high-quality ALDAl2O3 films. We examine a stack consisting of a thin AlOx passivation layer and a PECVD silicon nitride (SiNy) capping layer. Surface recombination velocities below 9 cm/s were measured on low-resistivity (1.4 Ωcm) p-type crystalline silicon wafers passivated either by ICP-PECVD-AlOx films or by ALD-Al2O3 films after annealing at 425°C. Both passivation schemes provide an excellent thermal stability during firing at 910°C with SRVs below 12 cm/s for both, Al2O3/SiNy stacks and single Al 2O3 layers. A fixed negative charge of -4×10 12 cm-2 is measured for ICP-AlOx and ALD-Al2O3, whereas the interface state density is higher for the ICP-AlOx layer with values of 11.0×1011 eV-1cm-2 compared to 1.3×1011 eV -1cm-2 for ALD-Al2O3. Implemented into large-area screen-printed PERC solar cells, an independently confirmed efficiency of 20.1% for ICP-AlOx and an efficiency of 19.6% for ALD-Al2O3 are achieved.

AB - The deposition rate of the standard (i.e. sequential) atomic layer deposition (ALD) process is very low compared to the plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition (PECVD) process. Therefore, as a short- and medium-term perspective, PECVD aluminium oxide (AlOx) films might be better suited for the implementation into industrial-type solar cells than ALD-Al 2O3 films. In this paper, we report results achieved with a newly developed PECVD deposition process for AlOx using an inductively coupled plasma (ICP). We compare the results to high-quality ALDAl2O3 films. We examine a stack consisting of a thin AlOx passivation layer and a PECVD silicon nitride (SiNy) capping layer. Surface recombination velocities below 9 cm/s were measured on low-resistivity (1.4 Ωcm) p-type crystalline silicon wafers passivated either by ICP-PECVD-AlOx films or by ALD-Al2O3 films after annealing at 425°C. Both passivation schemes provide an excellent thermal stability during firing at 910°C with SRVs below 12 cm/s for both, Al2O3/SiNy stacks and single Al 2O3 layers. A fixed negative charge of -4×10 12 cm-2 is measured for ICP-AlOx and ALD-Al2O3, whereas the interface state density is higher for the ICP-AlOx layer with values of 11.0×1011 eV-1cm-2 compared to 1.3×1011 eV -1cm-2 for ALD-Al2O3. Implemented into large-area screen-printed PERC solar cells, an independently confirmed efficiency of 20.1% for ICP-AlOx and an efficiency of 19.6% for ALD-Al2O3 are achieved.

KW - Aluminum oxide

KW - Silicon

KW - Solar Cells

KW - Surface passivation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897137824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.080

DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.07.080

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:84897137824

VL - 27

SP - 379

EP - 384

JO - Energy Procedia

JF - Energy Procedia

SN - 1876-6102

T2 - 2nd International Conference on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics, SiliconPV 2012

Y2 - 3 April 2012 through 5 April 2012

ER -

By the same author(s)