Comparison of different cross-sectional approaches for the structural design and optimization of composite wind turbine blades based on beam models

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • German Aerospace Center (DLR)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1465-1481
Number of pages17
JournalWind Energy Science
Volume9
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jul 2024

Abstract

During the preliminary design phase of wind turbine blades, the evaluation of many design candidates in a short period of time plays an important role. Computationally efficient methods for the structural analysis that correctly predict stiffness matrix entries for beam models including the (bend-twist) coupling terms are thus needed. The present paper provides an extended overview of available approaches and shows their abilities to fulfill the requirements for the composite design of rotor blades with respect to accuracy and computational efficiency. Three cross-sectional theories are selected and implemented to compare the prediction quality of the cross-sectional coupling stiffness terms and the stress distribution based on different multi-cell test cross-sections. The cross-sectional results are compared with the 2D finite element code BECAS and are discussed in the context of accuracy and computational efficiency. The analytical solution performing best shows very small deviations in the stiffness matrix entries compared to BECAS (below 1% in the majority of test cases). It achieved a better resolution of the stress distribution and a computation time that is more than an order of magnitude smaller using the same spatial discretization. The deviations of the stress distributions are below 10% for most test cases. The analytical solution can thus be rated as a feasible approach for a beam-based pre-design of wind turbine rotor blades.

Cite this

Comparison of different cross-sectional approaches for the structural design and optimization of composite wind turbine blades based on beam models. / Werthen, Edgar; Hardt, Daniel; Balzani, Claudio et al.
In: Wind Energy Science, Vol. 9, No. 7, 08.07.2024, p. 1465-1481.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Werthen E, Hardt D, Balzani C, Hühne C. Comparison of different cross-sectional approaches for the structural design and optimization of composite wind turbine blades based on beam models. Wind Energy Science. 2024 Jul 8;9(7):1465-1481. doi: 10.5194/wes-9-1465-2024
Download
@article{21ae5b984062444d8e8a4a1c541c3c0c,
title = "Comparison of different cross-sectional approaches for the structural design and optimization of composite wind turbine blades based on beam models",
abstract = "During the preliminary design phase of wind turbine blades, the evaluation of many design candidates in a short period of time plays an important role. Computationally efficient methods for the structural analysis that correctly predict stiffness matrix entries for beam models including the (bend-twist) coupling terms are thus needed. The present paper provides an extended overview of available approaches and shows their abilities to fulfill the requirements for the composite design of rotor blades with respect to accuracy and computational efficiency. Three cross-sectional theories are selected and implemented to compare the prediction quality of the cross-sectional coupling stiffness terms and the stress distribution based on different multi-cell test cross-sections. The cross-sectional results are compared with the 2D finite element code BECAS and are discussed in the context of accuracy and computational efficiency. The analytical solution performing best shows very small deviations in the stiffness matrix entries compared to BECAS (below 1% in the majority of test cases). It achieved a better resolution of the stress distribution and a computation time that is more than an order of magnitude smaller using the same spatial discretization. The deviations of the stress distributions are below 10% for most test cases. The analytical solution can thus be rated as a feasible approach for a beam-based pre-design of wind turbine rotor blades.",
author = "Edgar Werthen and Daniel Hardt and Claudio Balzani and Christian H{\"u}hne",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 Copernicus Publications. All rights reserved.",
year = "2024",
month = jul,
day = "8",
doi = "10.5194/wes-9-1465-2024",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1465--1481",
number = "7",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of different cross-sectional approaches for the structural design and optimization of composite wind turbine blades based on beam models

AU - Werthen, Edgar

AU - Hardt, Daniel

AU - Balzani, Claudio

AU - Hühne, Christian

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Copernicus Publications. All rights reserved.

PY - 2024/7/8

Y1 - 2024/7/8

N2 - During the preliminary design phase of wind turbine blades, the evaluation of many design candidates in a short period of time plays an important role. Computationally efficient methods for the structural analysis that correctly predict stiffness matrix entries for beam models including the (bend-twist) coupling terms are thus needed. The present paper provides an extended overview of available approaches and shows their abilities to fulfill the requirements for the composite design of rotor blades with respect to accuracy and computational efficiency. Three cross-sectional theories are selected and implemented to compare the prediction quality of the cross-sectional coupling stiffness terms and the stress distribution based on different multi-cell test cross-sections. The cross-sectional results are compared with the 2D finite element code BECAS and are discussed in the context of accuracy and computational efficiency. The analytical solution performing best shows very small deviations in the stiffness matrix entries compared to BECAS (below 1% in the majority of test cases). It achieved a better resolution of the stress distribution and a computation time that is more than an order of magnitude smaller using the same spatial discretization. The deviations of the stress distributions are below 10% for most test cases. The analytical solution can thus be rated as a feasible approach for a beam-based pre-design of wind turbine rotor blades.

AB - During the preliminary design phase of wind turbine blades, the evaluation of many design candidates in a short period of time plays an important role. Computationally efficient methods for the structural analysis that correctly predict stiffness matrix entries for beam models including the (bend-twist) coupling terms are thus needed. The present paper provides an extended overview of available approaches and shows their abilities to fulfill the requirements for the composite design of rotor blades with respect to accuracy and computational efficiency. Three cross-sectional theories are selected and implemented to compare the prediction quality of the cross-sectional coupling stiffness terms and the stress distribution based on different multi-cell test cross-sections. The cross-sectional results are compared with the 2D finite element code BECAS and are discussed in the context of accuracy and computational efficiency. The analytical solution performing best shows very small deviations in the stiffness matrix entries compared to BECAS (below 1% in the majority of test cases). It achieved a better resolution of the stress distribution and a computation time that is more than an order of magnitude smaller using the same spatial discretization. The deviations of the stress distributions are below 10% for most test cases. The analytical solution can thus be rated as a feasible approach for a beam-based pre-design of wind turbine rotor blades.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198263196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5194/wes-9-1465-2024

DO - 10.5194/wes-9-1465-2024

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85198263196

VL - 9

SP - 1465

EP - 1481

JO - Wind Energy Science

JF - Wind Energy Science

SN - 2366-7443

IS - 7

ER -

By the same author(s)