Comparison of calculation methods for hybrid stepping motors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Cornelia Stuebig
  • Bernd Ponick
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number6352908
Pages (from-to)2182-2189
Number of pages8
JournalIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
Volume48
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Abstract

In scientific and industrial research and development, usually, one of two possible methods to predict a motor's performance is used. Analytical calculation based on the motor's electric and/or magnetic circuit provides results almost instantaneously but may be faulty when saturation effects have to be considered or complex geometries are involved. In this case, the finite-element method (FEM) is a useful and widely deployed tool-its disadvantage being that it is more time-consuming than analytical modeling. Most motor geometries can be simulated using a 2-D FEM analysis. However, for some motor geometries, the 2-D FEM analysis is not feasible, e.g., because of a 3-D distribution of the motor's electromagnetic field. One of those is the hybrid stepping motor (HSM). Analytical modeling of these motors proves to be difficult due to their complex geometry. This work presents an improved approach to calculating HSMs based on a combination of analytical and numerical methods. Compared with a 3-D FEM analysis, the combined model proves to be much faster. Measurements and results gained from 3-D FEM models of different sizes prove the method's validity. The models' results are similar; the analytical approach, however, has the advantage of a much shorter calculation time.

Keywords

    Magnetic circuits, magnetic field effects, modeling, stepper motors, three-dimensional (3-D) finite-element method (FEM)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Comparison of calculation methods for hybrid stepping motors. / Stuebig, Cornelia; Ponick, Bernd.
In: IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 48, No. 6, 6352908, 2012, p. 2182-2189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Stuebig C, Ponick B. Comparison of calculation methods for hybrid stepping motors. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 2012;48(6):2182-2189. 6352908. doi: 10.1109/TIA.2012.2226994
Stuebig, Cornelia ; Ponick, Bernd. / Comparison of calculation methods for hybrid stepping motors. In: IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 2012 ; Vol. 48, No. 6. pp. 2182-2189.
Download
@article{5ece863d59964e56809069f0ea5c8a43,
title = "Comparison of calculation methods for hybrid stepping motors",
abstract = "In scientific and industrial research and development, usually, one of two possible methods to predict a motor's performance is used. Analytical calculation based on the motor's electric and/or magnetic circuit provides results almost instantaneously but may be faulty when saturation effects have to be considered or complex geometries are involved. In this case, the finite-element method (FEM) is a useful and widely deployed tool-its disadvantage being that it is more time-consuming than analytical modeling. Most motor geometries can be simulated using a 2-D FEM analysis. However, for some motor geometries, the 2-D FEM analysis is not feasible, e.g., because of a 3-D distribution of the motor's electromagnetic field. One of those is the hybrid stepping motor (HSM). Analytical modeling of these motors proves to be difficult due to their complex geometry. This work presents an improved approach to calculating HSMs based on a combination of analytical and numerical methods. Compared with a 3-D FEM analysis, the combined model proves to be much faster. Measurements and results gained from 3-D FEM models of different sizes prove the method's validity. The models' results are similar; the analytical approach, however, has the advantage of a much shorter calculation time.",
keywords = "Magnetic circuits, magnetic field effects, modeling, stepper motors, three-dimensional (3-D) finite-element method (FEM)",
author = "Cornelia Stuebig and Bernd Ponick",
note = "Funding Information: 1U.S. Patent No. 2589999 by Feiertag, K.M. and Donahoo, J.T (1952) and No. 3866104 by Heine, G. (1975). Copyright: Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1109/TIA.2012.2226994",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "2182--2189",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications",
issn = "0093-9994",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of calculation methods for hybrid stepping motors

AU - Stuebig, Cornelia

AU - Ponick, Bernd

N1 - Funding Information: 1U.S. Patent No. 2589999 by Feiertag, K.M. and Donahoo, J.T (1952) and No. 3866104 by Heine, G. (1975). Copyright: Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In scientific and industrial research and development, usually, one of two possible methods to predict a motor's performance is used. Analytical calculation based on the motor's electric and/or magnetic circuit provides results almost instantaneously but may be faulty when saturation effects have to be considered or complex geometries are involved. In this case, the finite-element method (FEM) is a useful and widely deployed tool-its disadvantage being that it is more time-consuming than analytical modeling. Most motor geometries can be simulated using a 2-D FEM analysis. However, for some motor geometries, the 2-D FEM analysis is not feasible, e.g., because of a 3-D distribution of the motor's electromagnetic field. One of those is the hybrid stepping motor (HSM). Analytical modeling of these motors proves to be difficult due to their complex geometry. This work presents an improved approach to calculating HSMs based on a combination of analytical and numerical methods. Compared with a 3-D FEM analysis, the combined model proves to be much faster. Measurements and results gained from 3-D FEM models of different sizes prove the method's validity. The models' results are similar; the analytical approach, however, has the advantage of a much shorter calculation time.

AB - In scientific and industrial research and development, usually, one of two possible methods to predict a motor's performance is used. Analytical calculation based on the motor's electric and/or magnetic circuit provides results almost instantaneously but may be faulty when saturation effects have to be considered or complex geometries are involved. In this case, the finite-element method (FEM) is a useful and widely deployed tool-its disadvantage being that it is more time-consuming than analytical modeling. Most motor geometries can be simulated using a 2-D FEM analysis. However, for some motor geometries, the 2-D FEM analysis is not feasible, e.g., because of a 3-D distribution of the motor's electromagnetic field. One of those is the hybrid stepping motor (HSM). Analytical modeling of these motors proves to be difficult due to their complex geometry. This work presents an improved approach to calculating HSMs based on a combination of analytical and numerical methods. Compared with a 3-D FEM analysis, the combined model proves to be much faster. Measurements and results gained from 3-D FEM models of different sizes prove the method's validity. The models' results are similar; the analytical approach, however, has the advantage of a much shorter calculation time.

KW - Magnetic circuits

KW - magnetic field effects

KW - modeling

KW - stepper motors

KW - three-dimensional (3-D) finite-element method (FEM)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872099498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TIA.2012.2226994

DO - 10.1109/TIA.2012.2226994

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84872099498

VL - 48

SP - 2182

EP - 2189

JO - IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications

JF - IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications

SN - 0093-9994

IS - 6

M1 - 6352908

ER -