Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | HAI 2017 - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction |
| Pages | 121-129 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| ISBN (electronic) | 9781450351133 |
| Publication status | Published - 17 Oct 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction, HAI 2017 - Bielefeld, Germany Duration: 17 Oct 2017 → 20 Oct 2017 |
Abstract
A comparison between behavioural architectures, specifically a BDI architecture and a finite-state machine, for a collaborative package delivery system is presented. The system should assist a user in handling packages in cluttered environments. The entire system is built using open-source solutions for modules including speech recognition, person detection and tracking, and navigation. For the comparison, we use three criteria, namely, a static implementation-based comparison, a dynamic comparison and a qualitative comparison. Based on our results, we provide experimental evidence that supports the theoretical consensus about the domain of applicability for both, BDI architectures and finite-state machines. However, we cannot support or discourage any of the tested architectures for the particular case of the collaborative package delivery scenario, due to the non-overlapping strengths and weakness of both approaches. Finally, we outline future improvements to the system itself as well as the comparison of both behavioural architectures.
Keywords
- Behaviour-Based Architectures, Human-Robot Collaboration, Package Delivery Scenario
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Computer Science(all)
- Human-Computer Interaction
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
HAI 2017 - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction. 2017. p. 121-129.
Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Research › peer review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Comparison of behaviour-based architectures for a collaborative package delivery task
AU - Remmels, Melanie
AU - Navarro-Guerrero, Nicolas
AU - Wermter, Stefan
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 ACM.
PY - 2017/10/17
Y1 - 2017/10/17
N2 - A comparison between behavioural architectures, specifically a BDI architecture and a finite-state machine, for a collaborative package delivery system is presented. The system should assist a user in handling packages in cluttered environments. The entire system is built using open-source solutions for modules including speech recognition, person detection and tracking, and navigation. For the comparison, we use three criteria, namely, a static implementation-based comparison, a dynamic comparison and a qualitative comparison. Based on our results, we provide experimental evidence that supports the theoretical consensus about the domain of applicability for both, BDI architectures and finite-state machines. However, we cannot support or discourage any of the tested architectures for the particular case of the collaborative package delivery scenario, due to the non-overlapping strengths and weakness of both approaches. Finally, we outline future improvements to the system itself as well as the comparison of both behavioural architectures.
AB - A comparison between behavioural architectures, specifically a BDI architecture and a finite-state machine, for a collaborative package delivery system is presented. The system should assist a user in handling packages in cluttered environments. The entire system is built using open-source solutions for modules including speech recognition, person detection and tracking, and navigation. For the comparison, we use three criteria, namely, a static implementation-based comparison, a dynamic comparison and a qualitative comparison. Based on our results, we provide experimental evidence that supports the theoretical consensus about the domain of applicability for both, BDI architectures and finite-state machines. However, we cannot support or discourage any of the tested architectures for the particular case of the collaborative package delivery scenario, due to the non-overlapping strengths and weakness of both approaches. Finally, we outline future improvements to the system itself as well as the comparison of both behavioural architectures.
KW - Behaviour-Based Architectures
KW - Human-Robot Collaboration
KW - Package Delivery Scenario
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034863085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3125739.3125764
DO - 10.1145/3125739.3125764
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85034863085
SP - 121
EP - 129
BT - HAI 2017 - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction
T2 - 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction, HAI 2017
Y2 - 17 October 2017 through 20 October 2017
ER -