Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 141-149 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 3 |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2020 |
Abstract
How many comparison dimensions do individuals consider when they are asked to make similarity judgments? I addressed individual heterogeneity in the number of comparison dimensions with data from a laboratory experiment. I used multidimensional scaling to estimate the number of dimensions on the individual level. I found that the number of dimensions varies across subjects and that the mean number of dimensions in real data is significantly lower than the mean number of dimensions in randomly simulated data. Moreover, I found that the number of dimensions is correlated with judgment time and with propensity to make nonmonotonic judgments. However, there is no direct relationship between the number of dimensions considered by participants and their perception of the average similarity between stimuli. In summary, I found evidence that indicates analytical similarity judgment based on a relatively low number of dimensions.
Keywords
- Dimensionality, Latent dimensions, Multidimensional scaling, Similarity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Psychology(all)
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Psychology(all)
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Business, Management and Accounting(all)
- Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
- Psychology(all)
- Applied Psychology
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
- Neuroscience(all)
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Neuroscience(all)
- Behavioral Neuroscience
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, Vol. 13, No. 3, 09.2020, p. 141-149.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison dimensions and similarity
T2 - Addressing individual heterogeneity
AU - Jelnov, Pavel
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - How many comparison dimensions do individuals consider when they are asked to make similarity judgments? I addressed individual heterogeneity in the number of comparison dimensions with data from a laboratory experiment. I used multidimensional scaling to estimate the number of dimensions on the individual level. I found that the number of dimensions varies across subjects and that the mean number of dimensions in real data is significantly lower than the mean number of dimensions in randomly simulated data. Moreover, I found that the number of dimensions is correlated with judgment time and with propensity to make nonmonotonic judgments. However, there is no direct relationship between the number of dimensions considered by participants and their perception of the average similarity between stimuli. In summary, I found evidence that indicates analytical similarity judgment based on a relatively low number of dimensions.
AB - How many comparison dimensions do individuals consider when they are asked to make similarity judgments? I addressed individual heterogeneity in the number of comparison dimensions with data from a laboratory experiment. I used multidimensional scaling to estimate the number of dimensions on the individual level. I found that the number of dimensions varies across subjects and that the mean number of dimensions in real data is significantly lower than the mean number of dimensions in randomly simulated data. Moreover, I found that the number of dimensions is correlated with judgment time and with propensity to make nonmonotonic judgments. However, there is no direct relationship between the number of dimensions considered by participants and their perception of the average similarity between stimuli. In summary, I found evidence that indicates analytical similarity judgment based on a relatively low number of dimensions.
KW - Dimensionality
KW - Latent dimensions
KW - Multidimensional scaling
KW - Similarity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091738183&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/npe0000131
DO - 10.1037/npe0000131
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85091738183
VL - 13
SP - 141
EP - 149
JO - Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics
JF - Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics
SN - 1937-321X
IS - 3
ER -