Comparing classical and quantum equilibration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Artur S.L. Malabarba
  • Terry Farrelly
  • Anthony J. Short

External Research Organisations

  • University of Bristol
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number032119
JournalPhysical Review E
Volume94
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 15 Sept 2016
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

By using a physically relevant and theory independent definition of measurement-based equilibration, we show quantitatively that equilibration is easier for quantum systems than for classical systems, in the situation where the initial state of the system is completely known (a pure state). This shows that quantum equilibration is a fundamental aspect of many quantum systems, while classical equilibration relies on experimental ignorance. When the state is not completely known (a mixed state), this framework also shows that quantum equilibration requires weaker conditions.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Comparing classical and quantum equilibration. / Malabarba, Artur S.L.; Farrelly, Terry; Short, Anthony J.
In: Physical Review E, Vol. 94, No. 3, 032119, 15.09.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Malabarba, ASL, Farrelly, T & Short, AJ 2016, 'Comparing classical and quantum equilibration', Physical Review E, vol. 94, no. 3, 032119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.032119
Malabarba, A. S. L., Farrelly, T., & Short, A. J. (2016). Comparing classical and quantum equilibration. Physical Review E, 94(3), Article 032119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.032119
Malabarba ASL, Farrelly T, Short AJ. Comparing classical and quantum equilibration. Physical Review E. 2016 Sept 15;94(3):032119. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.032119
Malabarba, Artur S.L. ; Farrelly, Terry ; Short, Anthony J. / Comparing classical and quantum equilibration. In: Physical Review E. 2016 ; Vol. 94, No. 3.
Download
@article{4345b167133f4d22a7ee2db7a4e621f7,
title = "Comparing classical and quantum equilibration",
abstract = "By using a physically relevant and theory independent definition of measurement-based equilibration, we show quantitatively that equilibration is easier for quantum systems than for classical systems, in the situation where the initial state of the system is completely known (a pure state). This shows that quantum equilibration is a fundamental aspect of many quantum systems, while classical equilibration relies on experimental ignorance. When the state is not completely known (a mixed state), this framework also shows that quantum equilibration requires weaker conditions.",
author = "Malabarba, {Artur S.L.} and Terry Farrelly and Short, {Anthony J.}",
note = "Funding information: A.J.S. acknowledges support from the Royal Society and FQXi through SVCF. A.S.L.M. acknowledges support from the CNPq. T.F. is grateful for support from the ERC grants QFTCMPS and SIQS and by the cluster of excellence EXC201 Quantum Engineering and Space-Time Research.",
year = "2016",
month = sep,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevE.94.032119",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
journal = "Physical Review E",
issn = "2470-0045",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing classical and quantum equilibration

AU - Malabarba, Artur S.L.

AU - Farrelly, Terry

AU - Short, Anthony J.

N1 - Funding information: A.J.S. acknowledges support from the Royal Society and FQXi through SVCF. A.S.L.M. acknowledges support from the CNPq. T.F. is grateful for support from the ERC grants QFTCMPS and SIQS and by the cluster of excellence EXC201 Quantum Engineering and Space-Time Research.

PY - 2016/9/15

Y1 - 2016/9/15

N2 - By using a physically relevant and theory independent definition of measurement-based equilibration, we show quantitatively that equilibration is easier for quantum systems than for classical systems, in the situation where the initial state of the system is completely known (a pure state). This shows that quantum equilibration is a fundamental aspect of many quantum systems, while classical equilibration relies on experimental ignorance. When the state is not completely known (a mixed state), this framework also shows that quantum equilibration requires weaker conditions.

AB - By using a physically relevant and theory independent definition of measurement-based equilibration, we show quantitatively that equilibration is easier for quantum systems than for classical systems, in the situation where the initial state of the system is completely known (a pure state). This shows that quantum equilibration is a fundamental aspect of many quantum systems, while classical equilibration relies on experimental ignorance. When the state is not completely known (a mixed state), this framework also shows that quantum equilibration requires weaker conditions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990211625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.032119

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.032119

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84990211625

VL - 94

JO - Physical Review E

JF - Physical Review E

SN - 2470-0045

IS - 3

M1 - 032119

ER -