Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 336-343 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | GEODERMA |
| Volume | 146 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Jul 2008 |
Abstract
Soil wettability affects physical properties such as aggregate stability, infiltration rate, or erodibility. To describe the wetting properties of soil, the soil-air-water contact angle (CA) is often used. At present, a direct measurement of the CA determined on intact soil aggregates and a direct comparison with corresponding homogenized aggregates is still lacking, mainly because standard methods have not been defined to measure the wettability of soil aggregates. In this study, the Capillary Rise Method (CRM) was used to assess contact angles of single intact 1-2 mm soil aggregates, packings of intact aggregates and packings of crushed (homogenized) aggregates of 9 topsoils and 3 humus subsoils from 5 sites in Germany. In general, CAs of the homogenized aggregates were quite similar for all soils (65° ± 10°), while CAs for aggregate packings and single aggregates generally were larger for grassland and forest soils (60° to 80°) than for arable soils (0° to 20°). It was concluded that all soils contain potentially hydrophobic pore surfaces, but the effectiveness of these surfaces to create water repellency depends on the small-scale architecture of the pore space and the distribution/position of hydrophobic components inside the matrix. These findings suggest that it is misleading, particularly for agricultural soils, to quantify wetting properties by only analyzing homogenized soil. We propose that CRM-CA measurements should be extended to investigations of intact aggregates and the wetting coefficient k = cosθ should also be displayed to distinguish more clearly between completely wettable soils and soils with low subcritical repellency. Finally, it should be noted that the methods proposed are only applicable to non-hydrophobic soil exhibiting subcritical water repellency (CA > 0°,..., CA ≤ 90°).
Keywords
- Arable land, Capillary Rise Method, Contact angle, Forest, Grassland, Soil aggregates, Wettability
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
- Soil Science
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: GEODERMA, Vol. 146, No. 1-2, 31.07.2008, p. 336-343.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing capillary rise contact angles of soil aggregates and homogenized soil
AU - Ramírez-Flores, Juan C.
AU - Woche, Susanne K.
AU - Bachmann, Jörg
AU - Goebel, Marc O.
AU - Hallett, Paul D.
N1 - Funding Information: The results of this paper are part of the research project “Surface Energy Characterization of Heterogeneous Porous Media: Theoretical and Experimental Assessment of the Wettability of Soil” financed by the Niedersachsen Foundation (NHDF No. 22002) and was partly supported by the priority program of the German Research Foundation DFG (SPP 1090). We also like to thank the “Höhere Landbauschule Rotthalmünster” for the possibility to take soil samples from their long-term experimental site and Axel Lamparter for his help during the sampling campaign. The Scottish Crop Research Institute receives grant-in-aid from the Scottish Government Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate. Copyright: Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2008/7/31
Y1 - 2008/7/31
N2 - Soil wettability affects physical properties such as aggregate stability, infiltration rate, or erodibility. To describe the wetting properties of soil, the soil-air-water contact angle (CA) is often used. At present, a direct measurement of the CA determined on intact soil aggregates and a direct comparison with corresponding homogenized aggregates is still lacking, mainly because standard methods have not been defined to measure the wettability of soil aggregates. In this study, the Capillary Rise Method (CRM) was used to assess contact angles of single intact 1-2 mm soil aggregates, packings of intact aggregates and packings of crushed (homogenized) aggregates of 9 topsoils and 3 humus subsoils from 5 sites in Germany. In general, CAs of the homogenized aggregates were quite similar for all soils (65° ± 10°), while CAs for aggregate packings and single aggregates generally were larger for grassland and forest soils (60° to 80°) than for arable soils (0° to 20°). It was concluded that all soils contain potentially hydrophobic pore surfaces, but the effectiveness of these surfaces to create water repellency depends on the small-scale architecture of the pore space and the distribution/position of hydrophobic components inside the matrix. These findings suggest that it is misleading, particularly for agricultural soils, to quantify wetting properties by only analyzing homogenized soil. We propose that CRM-CA measurements should be extended to investigations of intact aggregates and the wetting coefficient k = cosθ should also be displayed to distinguish more clearly between completely wettable soils and soils with low subcritical repellency. Finally, it should be noted that the methods proposed are only applicable to non-hydrophobic soil exhibiting subcritical water repellency (CA > 0°,..., CA ≤ 90°).
AB - Soil wettability affects physical properties such as aggregate stability, infiltration rate, or erodibility. To describe the wetting properties of soil, the soil-air-water contact angle (CA) is often used. At present, a direct measurement of the CA determined on intact soil aggregates and a direct comparison with corresponding homogenized aggregates is still lacking, mainly because standard methods have not been defined to measure the wettability of soil aggregates. In this study, the Capillary Rise Method (CRM) was used to assess contact angles of single intact 1-2 mm soil aggregates, packings of intact aggregates and packings of crushed (homogenized) aggregates of 9 topsoils and 3 humus subsoils from 5 sites in Germany. In general, CAs of the homogenized aggregates were quite similar for all soils (65° ± 10°), while CAs for aggregate packings and single aggregates generally were larger for grassland and forest soils (60° to 80°) than for arable soils (0° to 20°). It was concluded that all soils contain potentially hydrophobic pore surfaces, but the effectiveness of these surfaces to create water repellency depends on the small-scale architecture of the pore space and the distribution/position of hydrophobic components inside the matrix. These findings suggest that it is misleading, particularly for agricultural soils, to quantify wetting properties by only analyzing homogenized soil. We propose that CRM-CA measurements should be extended to investigations of intact aggregates and the wetting coefficient k = cosθ should also be displayed to distinguish more clearly between completely wettable soils and soils with low subcritical repellency. Finally, it should be noted that the methods proposed are only applicable to non-hydrophobic soil exhibiting subcritical water repellency (CA > 0°,..., CA ≤ 90°).
KW - Arable land
KW - Capillary Rise Method
KW - Contact angle
KW - Forest
KW - Grassland
KW - Soil aggregates
KW - Wettability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48349139680&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.05.032
DO - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.05.032
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:48349139680
VL - 146
SP - 336
EP - 343
JO - GEODERMA
JF - GEODERMA
SN - 0016-7061
IS - 1-2
ER -