Common pitfalls when testing additivity of treatment mixtures with chi-square analyses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-141
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Applied Entomology
Volume140
Issue number1-2
Early online date14 Aug 2015
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

Abstract

Studying interactions of multiple pesticides applied simultaneously in a mixture is a common task in phytopathology. Statistical methods are employed to test whether the treatment components influence each other's efficacy in a promotive or inhibitory way (synergistic or antagonistic interaction) or rather act independent of one another (additivity). The trouble is that widely used procedures based on chi-square tests are often seriously flawed, either because people apply them in a preposterous way or because the method simply does not fit the problem at hand. Browsing recent volumes of entomological journals, we found that numerous researchers have (in all likelihood unwittingly) analysed their data as if they had had a sample size of 100 or, equally bad, a sample size of one! We show how to avoid such poor practices and further argue that chi-square testing is, even if applied correctly (meaning that no technical errors are made), a limited purpose tool for assessing treatment interactions.

Keywords

    Antagonism, Integrated pest management, Interaction, Statistical analysis, Synergism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Common pitfalls when testing additivity of treatment mixtures with chi-square analyses. / Pallmann, Philip; Schaarschmidt, Frank.
In: Journal of Applied Entomology, Vol. 140, No. 1-2, 01.02.2016, p. 135-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{66ea33f25a0a4e47a11d9f3f72254fc1,
title = "Common pitfalls when testing additivity of treatment mixtures with chi-square analyses",
abstract = "Studying interactions of multiple pesticides applied simultaneously in a mixture is a common task in phytopathology. Statistical methods are employed to test whether the treatment components influence each other's efficacy in a promotive or inhibitory way (synergistic or antagonistic interaction) or rather act independent of one another (additivity). The trouble is that widely used procedures based on chi-square tests are often seriously flawed, either because people apply them in a preposterous way or because the method simply does not fit the problem at hand. Browsing recent volumes of entomological journals, we found that numerous researchers have (in all likelihood unwittingly) analysed their data as if they had had a sample size of 100 or, equally bad, a sample size of one! We show how to avoid such poor practices and further argue that chi-square testing is, even if applied correctly (meaning that no technical errors are made), a limited purpose tool for assessing treatment interactions.",
keywords = "Antagonism, Integrated pest management, Interaction, Statistical analysis, Synergism",
author = "Philip Pallmann and Frank Schaarschmidt",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.",
year = "2016",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jen.12258",
language = "English",
volume = "140",
pages = "135--141",
journal = "Journal of Applied Entomology",
issn = "0931-2048",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "1-2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Common pitfalls when testing additivity of treatment mixtures with chi-square analyses

AU - Pallmann, Philip

AU - Schaarschmidt, Frank

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Studying interactions of multiple pesticides applied simultaneously in a mixture is a common task in phytopathology. Statistical methods are employed to test whether the treatment components influence each other's efficacy in a promotive or inhibitory way (synergistic or antagonistic interaction) or rather act independent of one another (additivity). The trouble is that widely used procedures based on chi-square tests are often seriously flawed, either because people apply them in a preposterous way or because the method simply does not fit the problem at hand. Browsing recent volumes of entomological journals, we found that numerous researchers have (in all likelihood unwittingly) analysed their data as if they had had a sample size of 100 or, equally bad, a sample size of one! We show how to avoid such poor practices and further argue that chi-square testing is, even if applied correctly (meaning that no technical errors are made), a limited purpose tool for assessing treatment interactions.

AB - Studying interactions of multiple pesticides applied simultaneously in a mixture is a common task in phytopathology. Statistical methods are employed to test whether the treatment components influence each other's efficacy in a promotive or inhibitory way (synergistic or antagonistic interaction) or rather act independent of one another (additivity). The trouble is that widely used procedures based on chi-square tests are often seriously flawed, either because people apply them in a preposterous way or because the method simply does not fit the problem at hand. Browsing recent volumes of entomological journals, we found that numerous researchers have (in all likelihood unwittingly) analysed their data as if they had had a sample size of 100 or, equally bad, a sample size of one! We show how to avoid such poor practices and further argue that chi-square testing is, even if applied correctly (meaning that no technical errors are made), a limited purpose tool for assessing treatment interactions.

KW - Antagonism

KW - Integrated pest management

KW - Interaction

KW - Statistical analysis

KW - Synergism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954395898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jen.12258

DO - 10.1111/jen.12258

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84954395898

VL - 140

SP - 135

EP - 141

JO - Journal of Applied Entomology

JF - Journal of Applied Entomology

SN - 0931-2048

IS - 1-2

ER -

By the same author(s)