Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 3 Oct 2024 |
Abstract
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
2024.
Research output: Working paper/Preprint › Preprint
}
TY - UNPB
T1 - Comment on ‘The Classical Limit of Teleparallel Gravity’
AU - Schwartz, Philip K.
AU - von Blanckenburg, Arian L.
PY - 2024/10/3
Y1 - 2024/10/3
N2 - We critically discuss the claims of a recent article regarding the Newtonian limit of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) in pure-tetrad formulation (arXiv:2406.17594). In particular, we refute this article's purported main result that if a regular Newtonian limit exists, the torsion of the limiting derivative operator (i.e., connection) necessarily vanishes.
AB - We critically discuss the claims of a recent article regarding the Newtonian limit of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) in pure-tetrad formulation (arXiv:2406.17594). In particular, we refute this article's purported main result that if a regular Newtonian limit exists, the torsion of the limiting derivative operator (i.e., connection) necessarily vanishes.
M3 - Preprint
BT - Comment on ‘The Classical Limit of Teleparallel Gravity’
ER -