Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 5099 |
Journal | Remote sensing |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 20 |
Publication status | Published - 12 Oct 2022 |
Abstract
Terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) are contact-free measuring sensors that record dense point clouds of objects or scenes by acquiring coordinates and an intensity value for each point. The point clouds are scattered and noisy. Performing a mathematical surface approximation instead of working directly on the point cloud is an efficient way to reduce the data storage and structure the point clouds by transforming “data” to “information”. Applications include rigorous statistical testing for deformation analysis within the context of landslide monitoring. In order to reach an optimal approximation, classification and segmentation algorithms can identify and remove inhomogeneous structures, such as trees or bushes, to obtain a smooth and accurate mathematical surface of the ground. In this contribution, we compare methods to perform the classification of TLS point clouds with the aim of guiding the reader through the existing algorithms. Besides the traditional point cloud filtering methods, we will analyze machine learning classification algorithms based on the manual extraction of point cloud features, and a deep learning approach with automatic extraction of features called PointNet++. We have intentionally chosen strategies easy to implement and understand so that our results are reproducible for similar point clouds. We show that each method has advantages and drawbacks, depending on user criteria, such as the computational time, the classification accuracy needed, whether manual extraction is performed or not, and if prior information is required. We highlight that filtering methods are advantageous for the application at hand and perform a mathematical surface approximation as an illustration. Accordingly, we have chosen locally refined B-splines, which were shown to provide an optimal and computationally manageable approximation of TLS point clouds.
Keywords
- classification, deep learning, landslide monitoring, LR B-splines, point cloud, PointNet++, segmentation, terrestrial laser scanner
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Remote sensing, Vol. 14, No. 20, 5099, 12.10.2022.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Classification of Terrestrial Laser Scanner Point Clouds
T2 - A Comparison of Methods for Landslide Monitoring from Mathematical Surface Approximation
AU - Kermarrec, Gaël
AU - Yang, Zhonglong
AU - Czerwonka-Schröder, Daniel
N1 - Funding Information: The publication of this article was funded by the Open Access Fund of the Leibniz Universität Hannover. Gaël Kermarrec is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under the project KE2453/2-1. Daniel Czerwonka-Schröder from DMT-group, Germany, provided the data set. This measurement campaign was supported by the Research Fund of the European Union for Coal and Steel [RFCS project number 800689 (2018)].
PY - 2022/10/12
Y1 - 2022/10/12
N2 - Terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) are contact-free measuring sensors that record dense point clouds of objects or scenes by acquiring coordinates and an intensity value for each point. The point clouds are scattered and noisy. Performing a mathematical surface approximation instead of working directly on the point cloud is an efficient way to reduce the data storage and structure the point clouds by transforming “data” to “information”. Applications include rigorous statistical testing for deformation analysis within the context of landslide monitoring. In order to reach an optimal approximation, classification and segmentation algorithms can identify and remove inhomogeneous structures, such as trees or bushes, to obtain a smooth and accurate mathematical surface of the ground. In this contribution, we compare methods to perform the classification of TLS point clouds with the aim of guiding the reader through the existing algorithms. Besides the traditional point cloud filtering methods, we will analyze machine learning classification algorithms based on the manual extraction of point cloud features, and a deep learning approach with automatic extraction of features called PointNet++. We have intentionally chosen strategies easy to implement and understand so that our results are reproducible for similar point clouds. We show that each method has advantages and drawbacks, depending on user criteria, such as the computational time, the classification accuracy needed, whether manual extraction is performed or not, and if prior information is required. We highlight that filtering methods are advantageous for the application at hand and perform a mathematical surface approximation as an illustration. Accordingly, we have chosen locally refined B-splines, which were shown to provide an optimal and computationally manageable approximation of TLS point clouds.
AB - Terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) are contact-free measuring sensors that record dense point clouds of objects or scenes by acquiring coordinates and an intensity value for each point. The point clouds are scattered and noisy. Performing a mathematical surface approximation instead of working directly on the point cloud is an efficient way to reduce the data storage and structure the point clouds by transforming “data” to “information”. Applications include rigorous statistical testing for deformation analysis within the context of landslide monitoring. In order to reach an optimal approximation, classification and segmentation algorithms can identify and remove inhomogeneous structures, such as trees or bushes, to obtain a smooth and accurate mathematical surface of the ground. In this contribution, we compare methods to perform the classification of TLS point clouds with the aim of guiding the reader through the existing algorithms. Besides the traditional point cloud filtering methods, we will analyze machine learning classification algorithms based on the manual extraction of point cloud features, and a deep learning approach with automatic extraction of features called PointNet++. We have intentionally chosen strategies easy to implement and understand so that our results are reproducible for similar point clouds. We show that each method has advantages and drawbacks, depending on user criteria, such as the computational time, the classification accuracy needed, whether manual extraction is performed or not, and if prior information is required. We highlight that filtering methods are advantageous for the application at hand and perform a mathematical surface approximation as an illustration. Accordingly, we have chosen locally refined B-splines, which were shown to provide an optimal and computationally manageable approximation of TLS point clouds.
KW - classification
KW - deep learning
KW - landslide monitoring
KW - LR B-splines
KW - point cloud
KW - PointNet++
KW - segmentation
KW - terrestrial laser scanner
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140965500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/rs14205099
DO - 10.3390/rs14205099
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85140965500
VL - 14
JO - Remote sensing
JF - Remote sensing
SN - 2072-4292
IS - 20
M1 - 5099
ER -