Classification below the species level: when are infraspecific groups biologically meaningful?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • University Hospital Düsseldorf
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-260
Number of pages15
JournalBiological Journal of the Linnean Society
Volume134
Issue number1
Early online date26 May 2021
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2021

Abstract

Infraspecific taxa (subspecies, races and varieties) are often seen as real entities in nature and recognized as biologically meaningful groups. But because infraspecific taxa by definition are subdivisions of species, their status depends entirely on the status of 'their' species. This makes the status of infraspecific taxa crucially dependent on the way species are considered and thus on the various species concepts that have been advanced as answers to the 'species problem'. Accordingly, there is a profound lack of clarity regarding the following questions. What are infraspecific taxa? What is their biological meaning? Are they real entities or merely instrumental units? When should an infraspecific group be ranked and named as an infraspecific taxon? In this paper, we aim to contribute to greater clarity about these issues by examining which types of infraspecific groups are biologically meaningful in light of the main results from the species debate.

Keywords

    infraspecific taxa, philosophy of biology, realism, species problem, subspecies, subspecies pluralism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Classification below the species level: when are infraspecific groups biologically meaningful? / Reydon, Thomas A. C.; Kunz, Werner.
In: Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 134, No. 1, 01.09.2021, p. 246-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{fde33bb58cca4e0fa8be0d6487763935,
title = "Classification below the species level: when are infraspecific groups biologically meaningful?",
abstract = "Infraspecific taxa (subspecies, races and varieties) are often seen as real entities in nature and recognized as biologically meaningful groups. But because infraspecific taxa by definition are subdivisions of species, their status depends entirely on the status of 'their' species. This makes the status of infraspecific taxa crucially dependent on the way species are considered and thus on the various species concepts that have been advanced as answers to the 'species problem'. Accordingly, there is a profound lack of clarity regarding the following questions. What are infraspecific taxa? What is their biological meaning? Are they real entities or merely instrumental units? When should an infraspecific group be ranked and named as an infraspecific taxon? In this paper, we aim to contribute to greater clarity about these issues by examining which types of infraspecific groups are biologically meaningful in light of the main results from the species debate.",
keywords = "infraspecific taxa, philosophy of biology, realism, species problem, subspecies, subspecies pluralism",
author = "Reydon, {Thomas A. C.} and Werner Kunz",
year = "2021",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/biolinnean/blab067",
language = "English",
volume = "134",
pages = "246--260",
journal = "Biological Journal of the Linnean Society",
issn = "0024-4066",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classification below the species level

T2 - when are infraspecific groups biologically meaningful?

AU - Reydon, Thomas A. C.

AU - Kunz, Werner

PY - 2021/9/1

Y1 - 2021/9/1

N2 - Infraspecific taxa (subspecies, races and varieties) are often seen as real entities in nature and recognized as biologically meaningful groups. But because infraspecific taxa by definition are subdivisions of species, their status depends entirely on the status of 'their' species. This makes the status of infraspecific taxa crucially dependent on the way species are considered and thus on the various species concepts that have been advanced as answers to the 'species problem'. Accordingly, there is a profound lack of clarity regarding the following questions. What are infraspecific taxa? What is their biological meaning? Are they real entities or merely instrumental units? When should an infraspecific group be ranked and named as an infraspecific taxon? In this paper, we aim to contribute to greater clarity about these issues by examining which types of infraspecific groups are biologically meaningful in light of the main results from the species debate.

AB - Infraspecific taxa (subspecies, races and varieties) are often seen as real entities in nature and recognized as biologically meaningful groups. But because infraspecific taxa by definition are subdivisions of species, their status depends entirely on the status of 'their' species. This makes the status of infraspecific taxa crucially dependent on the way species are considered and thus on the various species concepts that have been advanced as answers to the 'species problem'. Accordingly, there is a profound lack of clarity regarding the following questions. What are infraspecific taxa? What is their biological meaning? Are they real entities or merely instrumental units? When should an infraspecific group be ranked and named as an infraspecific taxon? In this paper, we aim to contribute to greater clarity about these issues by examining which types of infraspecific groups are biologically meaningful in light of the main results from the species debate.

KW - infraspecific taxa

KW - philosophy of biology

KW - realism

KW - species problem

KW - subspecies

KW - subspecies pluralism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114343705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/biolinnean/blab067

DO - 10.1093/biolinnean/blab067

M3 - Article

VL - 134

SP - 246

EP - 260

JO - Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

JF - Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

SN - 0024-4066

IS - 1

ER -

By the same author(s)