Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

Chemistry Demonstrations and Visual Attention: Does the Setup Matter? Evidence from a Double-Blinded Eye-Tracking Study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

Research Organisations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1724-1735
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of chemical education
Volume95
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - 22 Aug 2018

Abstract

Although many chemistry demonstrations are proposed in educational literature, there are hardly any studies on how demonstrations should be set up in order to support students' perception. Against this background, the aim of the present study was to present and test setup principles for chemistry demonstrations, with regards to indicators of students' visual attention on the relevant equipment in a demonstration. On the basis of the Gestalt principles, we carried out an experimental double-blind eye-tracking study. We set up six demonstrations that each corresponded to one Gestalt principle ("Gestalt setting") and six demonstrations that explicitly violated one principle ("control setting"). There were 146 students from secondary schools randomly assigned to watch a demonstration either in a Gestalt or a control setting. Visual attention was captured using an eye-tracker (eye-follower 2.0). The total fixation count, total fixation duration, total mean fixation duration, and time taken to fixate were analyzed. The results show that demonstration setups have an impact on visual attention, with small to medium effects for each Gestalt principle. In order to support learners watching a demonstration, educators should carefully plan the setup with regard to their concrete learning goal(s) and the equipment they want to focus on. In particular cases, educators will have to decide purposefully between competing principles.

Keywords

    Applications of Chemistry, Demonstrations, Hands-On Learning/Manipulatives, High School/Introductory Chemistry, Laboratory Equipment/Apparatus, Laboratory Instruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Chemistry Demonstrations and Visual Attention: Does the Setup Matter? Evidence from a Double-Blinded Eye-Tracking Study. / Nehring, Andreas; Busch, Sebastian.
In: Journal of chemical education, Vol. 95, No. 10, 22.08.2018, p. 1724-1735.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{418f326a8cff4c1180136100a038c69a,
title = "Chemistry Demonstrations and Visual Attention:: Does the Setup Matter? Evidence from a Double-Blinded Eye-Tracking Study",
abstract = "Although many chemistry demonstrations are proposed in educational literature, there are hardly any studies on how demonstrations should be set up in order to support students' perception. Against this background, the aim of the present study was to present and test setup principles for chemistry demonstrations, with regards to indicators of students' visual attention on the relevant equipment in a demonstration. On the basis of the Gestalt principles, we carried out an experimental double-blind eye-tracking study. We set up six demonstrations that each corresponded to one Gestalt principle ({"}Gestalt setting{"}) and six demonstrations that explicitly violated one principle ({"}control setting{"}). There were 146 students from secondary schools randomly assigned to watch a demonstration either in a Gestalt or a control setting. Visual attention was captured using an eye-tracker (eye-follower 2.0). The total fixation count, total fixation duration, total mean fixation duration, and time taken to fixate were analyzed. The results show that demonstration setups have an impact on visual attention, with small to medium effects for each Gestalt principle. In order to support learners watching a demonstration, educators should carefully plan the setup with regard to their concrete learning goal(s) and the equipment they want to focus on. In particular cases, educators will have to decide purposefully between competing principles.",
keywords = "Applications of Chemistry, Demonstrations, Hands-On Learning/Manipulatives, High School/Introductory Chemistry, Laboratory Equipment/Apparatus, Laboratory Instruction",
author = "Andreas Nehring and Sebastian Busch",
year = "2018",
month = aug,
day = "22",
doi = "10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00133",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "1724--1735",
journal = "Journal of chemical education",
issn = "0021-9584",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "10",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chemistry Demonstrations and Visual Attention:

T2 - Does the Setup Matter? Evidence from a Double-Blinded Eye-Tracking Study

AU - Nehring, Andreas

AU - Busch, Sebastian

PY - 2018/8/22

Y1 - 2018/8/22

N2 - Although many chemistry demonstrations are proposed in educational literature, there are hardly any studies on how demonstrations should be set up in order to support students' perception. Against this background, the aim of the present study was to present and test setup principles for chemistry demonstrations, with regards to indicators of students' visual attention on the relevant equipment in a demonstration. On the basis of the Gestalt principles, we carried out an experimental double-blind eye-tracking study. We set up six demonstrations that each corresponded to one Gestalt principle ("Gestalt setting") and six demonstrations that explicitly violated one principle ("control setting"). There were 146 students from secondary schools randomly assigned to watch a demonstration either in a Gestalt or a control setting. Visual attention was captured using an eye-tracker (eye-follower 2.0). The total fixation count, total fixation duration, total mean fixation duration, and time taken to fixate were analyzed. The results show that demonstration setups have an impact on visual attention, with small to medium effects for each Gestalt principle. In order to support learners watching a demonstration, educators should carefully plan the setup with regard to their concrete learning goal(s) and the equipment they want to focus on. In particular cases, educators will have to decide purposefully between competing principles.

AB - Although many chemistry demonstrations are proposed in educational literature, there are hardly any studies on how demonstrations should be set up in order to support students' perception. Against this background, the aim of the present study was to present and test setup principles for chemistry demonstrations, with regards to indicators of students' visual attention on the relevant equipment in a demonstration. On the basis of the Gestalt principles, we carried out an experimental double-blind eye-tracking study. We set up six demonstrations that each corresponded to one Gestalt principle ("Gestalt setting") and six demonstrations that explicitly violated one principle ("control setting"). There were 146 students from secondary schools randomly assigned to watch a demonstration either in a Gestalt or a control setting. Visual attention was captured using an eye-tracker (eye-follower 2.0). The total fixation count, total fixation duration, total mean fixation duration, and time taken to fixate were analyzed. The results show that demonstration setups have an impact on visual attention, with small to medium effects for each Gestalt principle. In order to support learners watching a demonstration, educators should carefully plan the setup with regard to their concrete learning goal(s) and the equipment they want to focus on. In particular cases, educators will have to decide purposefully between competing principles.

KW - Applications of Chemistry

KW - Demonstrations

KW - Hands-On Learning/Manipulatives

KW - High School/Introductory Chemistry

KW - Laboratory Equipment/Apparatus

KW - Laboratory Instruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052967576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00133

DO - 10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00133

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85052967576

VL - 95

SP - 1724

EP - 1735

JO - Journal of chemical education

JF - Journal of chemical education

SN - 0021-9584

IS - 10

ER -

By the same author(s)