Biogeochemical limitations of carbon stabilization in forest subsoils

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
  • Technische Universität Dresden
  • Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries
  • University of Hohenheim
  • Ruhr-Universität Bochum
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-43
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
Volume185
Issue number1
Early online date17 Oct 2021
Publication statusPublished - 8 Feb 2022

Abstract

Background: Soils are important carbon (C) sinks or sources and thus of utmost importance for global carbon cycling. Particularly, subsoils are considered to have a high potential for additional C storage due to mineral surfaces still available for sorptive stabilization. Aims: Little information exists about the extent to which additional litter-derived C is transferred to and stabilized in subsoils. This study aimed at evaluating the role of litter-derived dissolved organic matter (DOM) inputs for the formation of stable mineral-associated C in subsoils. Methods: We carried out a multiple-method approach including field labeling with 13C-enriched litter, exposure of 13C-loaded reactive minerals to top- and subsoils, and laboratory sorption experiments. Results: For temperate forest soils, we found that the laboratory-based C sink capacity of subsoils is unlikely to be reached under field conditions. Surface C inputs via litter leachates are little conducive to the subsoil C pool. Only 0.5% of litter-derived C entered the subsoil as DOM within nearly 2 years and most of the recently sorbed C is prone to fast microbial mineralization rather than long-term mineral retention. Desorption to the soil solution and an adapted microbial community re-mobilize organic matter in subsoils faster than considered so far. Conclusions: We conclude that the factors controlling the current mineral retention and stabilization of C within temperate forest subsoils will likewise limit additional C uptake. Thus, in contrast to their widely debated potential to accrue more C, the role of forest subsoils as future C sink is likely overestimated and needs further reconsideration.

Keywords

    carbon cycling, climate change mitigation, microbial community composition, mineral-associated organic carbon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Biogeochemical limitations of carbon stabilization in forest subsoils. / Liebmann, Patrick; Mikutta, Robert; Kalbitz, Karsten et al.
In: Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Vol. 185, No. 1, 08.02.2022, p. 35-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Liebmann, P, Mikutta, R, Kalbitz, K, Wordell-Dietrich, P, Leinemann, T, Preusser, S, Mewes, O, Perrin, E, Bachmann, J, Don, A, Kandeler, E, Marschner, B, Schaarschmidt, F & Guggenberger, G 2022, 'Biogeochemical limitations of carbon stabilization in forest subsoils', Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.202100295
Liebmann, P., Mikutta, R., Kalbitz, K., Wordell-Dietrich, P., Leinemann, T., Preusser, S., Mewes, O., Perrin, E., Bachmann, J., Don, A., Kandeler, E., Marschner, B., Schaarschmidt, F., & Guggenberger, G. (2022). Biogeochemical limitations of carbon stabilization in forest subsoils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 185(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.202100295
Liebmann P, Mikutta R, Kalbitz K, Wordell-Dietrich P, Leinemann T, Preusser S et al. Biogeochemical limitations of carbon stabilization in forest subsoils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2022 Feb 8;185(1):35-43. Epub 2021 Oct 17. doi: 10.1002/jpln.202100295
Liebmann, Patrick ; Mikutta, Robert ; Kalbitz, Karsten et al. / Biogeochemical limitations of carbon stabilization in forest subsoils. In: Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2022 ; Vol. 185, No. 1. pp. 35-43.
Download
@article{90ed07db309d4ed3b8c28a32a1108ceb,
title = "Biogeochemical limitations of carbon stabilization in forest subsoils",
abstract = "Background: Soils are important carbon (C) sinks or sources and thus of utmost importance for global carbon cycling. Particularly, subsoils are considered to have a high potential for additional C storage due to mineral surfaces still available for sorptive stabilization. Aims: Little information exists about the extent to which additional litter-derived C is transferred to and stabilized in subsoils. This study aimed at evaluating the role of litter-derived dissolved organic matter (DOM) inputs for the formation of stable mineral-associated C in subsoils. Methods: We carried out a multiple-method approach including field labeling with 13C-enriched litter, exposure of 13C-loaded reactive minerals to top- and subsoils, and laboratory sorption experiments. Results: For temperate forest soils, we found that the laboratory-based C sink capacity of subsoils is unlikely to be reached under field conditions. Surface C inputs via litter leachates are little conducive to the subsoil C pool. Only 0.5% of litter-derived C entered the subsoil as DOM within nearly 2 years and most of the recently sorbed C is prone to fast microbial mineralization rather than long-term mineral retention. Desorption to the soil solution and an adapted microbial community re-mobilize organic matter in subsoils faster than considered so far. Conclusions: We conclude that the factors controlling the current mineral retention and stabilization of C within temperate forest subsoils will likewise limit additional C uptake. Thus, in contrast to their widely debated potential to accrue more C, the role of forest subsoils as future C sink is likely overestimated and needs further reconsideration.",
keywords = "carbon cycling, climate change mitigation, microbial community composition, mineral-associated organic carbon",
author = "Patrick Liebmann and Robert Mikutta and Karsten Kalbitz and Patrick Wordell-Dietrich and Timo Leinemann and Sebastian Preusser and Ole Mewes and Eike Perrin and J{\"o}rg Bachmann and Axel Don and Ellen Kandeler and Bernd Marschner and Frank Schaarschmidt and Georg Guggenberger",
note = "Funding Information: We thank Martin Volkmann, Hanna B?hme, Susanne K. Woche, and Frank Hegewald for their help in the field, and Heike Steffen and Anne Kathrin Herwig for sample preparations. We thank Manuela Unger for the DO13C measurements and Heike Haslwimmer for molecular analyses (qPCR data). Carsten Beyer is acknowledged for the analysis of the DOM composition. Financial support for this work was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within the framework of the DFG Research Unit 1806 ?The forgotten Part of Carbon Cycling: Organic Matter Storage and Turnover in Subsoils (SUBSOM)? and the individual grants GU 406/28?1,2, KA 1737/15?2, MI 1377/10?2, DO 1734/4?2, KA 1590/11?2, BA1359/13?2, BA1359/14?2, and MA 1830/14?2. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.",
year = "2022",
month = feb,
day = "8",
doi = "10.1002/jpln.202100295",
language = "English",
volume = "185",
pages = "35--43",
journal = "Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science",
issn = "1436-8730",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biogeochemical limitations of carbon stabilization in forest subsoils

AU - Liebmann, Patrick

AU - Mikutta, Robert

AU - Kalbitz, Karsten

AU - Wordell-Dietrich, Patrick

AU - Leinemann, Timo

AU - Preusser, Sebastian

AU - Mewes, Ole

AU - Perrin, Eike

AU - Bachmann, Jörg

AU - Don, Axel

AU - Kandeler, Ellen

AU - Marschner, Bernd

AU - Schaarschmidt, Frank

AU - Guggenberger, Georg

N1 - Funding Information: We thank Martin Volkmann, Hanna B?hme, Susanne K. Woche, and Frank Hegewald for their help in the field, and Heike Steffen and Anne Kathrin Herwig for sample preparations. We thank Manuela Unger for the DO13C measurements and Heike Haslwimmer for molecular analyses (qPCR data). Carsten Beyer is acknowledged for the analysis of the DOM composition. Financial support for this work was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within the framework of the DFG Research Unit 1806 ?The forgotten Part of Carbon Cycling: Organic Matter Storage and Turnover in Subsoils (SUBSOM)? and the individual grants GU 406/28?1,2, KA 1737/15?2, MI 1377/10?2, DO 1734/4?2, KA 1590/11?2, BA1359/13?2, BA1359/14?2, and MA 1830/14?2. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

PY - 2022/2/8

Y1 - 2022/2/8

N2 - Background: Soils are important carbon (C) sinks or sources and thus of utmost importance for global carbon cycling. Particularly, subsoils are considered to have a high potential for additional C storage due to mineral surfaces still available for sorptive stabilization. Aims: Little information exists about the extent to which additional litter-derived C is transferred to and stabilized in subsoils. This study aimed at evaluating the role of litter-derived dissolved organic matter (DOM) inputs for the formation of stable mineral-associated C in subsoils. Methods: We carried out a multiple-method approach including field labeling with 13C-enriched litter, exposure of 13C-loaded reactive minerals to top- and subsoils, and laboratory sorption experiments. Results: For temperate forest soils, we found that the laboratory-based C sink capacity of subsoils is unlikely to be reached under field conditions. Surface C inputs via litter leachates are little conducive to the subsoil C pool. Only 0.5% of litter-derived C entered the subsoil as DOM within nearly 2 years and most of the recently sorbed C is prone to fast microbial mineralization rather than long-term mineral retention. Desorption to the soil solution and an adapted microbial community re-mobilize organic matter in subsoils faster than considered so far. Conclusions: We conclude that the factors controlling the current mineral retention and stabilization of C within temperate forest subsoils will likewise limit additional C uptake. Thus, in contrast to their widely debated potential to accrue more C, the role of forest subsoils as future C sink is likely overestimated and needs further reconsideration.

AB - Background: Soils are important carbon (C) sinks or sources and thus of utmost importance for global carbon cycling. Particularly, subsoils are considered to have a high potential for additional C storage due to mineral surfaces still available for sorptive stabilization. Aims: Little information exists about the extent to which additional litter-derived C is transferred to and stabilized in subsoils. This study aimed at evaluating the role of litter-derived dissolved organic matter (DOM) inputs for the formation of stable mineral-associated C in subsoils. Methods: We carried out a multiple-method approach including field labeling with 13C-enriched litter, exposure of 13C-loaded reactive minerals to top- and subsoils, and laboratory sorption experiments. Results: For temperate forest soils, we found that the laboratory-based C sink capacity of subsoils is unlikely to be reached under field conditions. Surface C inputs via litter leachates are little conducive to the subsoil C pool. Only 0.5% of litter-derived C entered the subsoil as DOM within nearly 2 years and most of the recently sorbed C is prone to fast microbial mineralization rather than long-term mineral retention. Desorption to the soil solution and an adapted microbial community re-mobilize organic matter in subsoils faster than considered so far. Conclusions: We conclude that the factors controlling the current mineral retention and stabilization of C within temperate forest subsoils will likewise limit additional C uptake. Thus, in contrast to their widely debated potential to accrue more C, the role of forest subsoils as future C sink is likely overestimated and needs further reconsideration.

KW - carbon cycling

KW - climate change mitigation

KW - microbial community composition

KW - mineral-associated organic carbon

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117920978&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jpln.202100295

DO - 10.1002/jpln.202100295

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85117920978

VL - 185

SP - 35

EP - 43

JO - Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

JF - Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

SN - 1436-8730

IS - 1

ER -

By the same author(s)