Biocultural approaches to sustainability: A systematic review of the scientific literature

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Jan Hanspach
  • Lisbeth Jamila Haider
  • Elisa Oteros-Rozas
  • Anton Stahl Olafsson
  • Natalie M. Gulsrud
  • Christopher M. Raymond
  • Mario Torralba
  • Berta Martín-López
  • Claudia Bieling
  • María García-Martín
  • Christian Albert
  • Thomas H. Beery
  • Nora Fagerholm
  • Isabel Díaz-Reviriego
  • Annika Drews-Shambroom
  • Tobias Plieninger

External Research Organisations

  • Leuphana University Lüneburg
  • Stockholm University
  • University of Vic – University of Central Catalunya (UVic-UCC)
  • University of Copenhagen
  • University of Helsinki
  • University of Kassel
  • University of Hohenheim
  • University of Göttingen
  • Kristianstad University
  • University of Turku
  • Ruhr-Universität Bochum
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)643-659
Number of pages17
JournalPeople and Nature
Volume2
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 3 Sept 2020
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Current sustainability challenges demand approaches that acknowledge a plurality of human–nature interactions and worldviews, for which biocultural approaches are considered appropriate and timely. This systematic review analyses the application of biocultural approaches to sustainability in scientific journal articles published between 1990 and 2018 through a mixed methods approach combining qualitative content analysis and quantitative multivariate methods. The study identifies seven distinct biocultural lenses, that is, different ways of understanding and applying biocultural approaches, which to different degrees consider the key aspects of sustainability science—inter- and transdisciplinarity, social justice and normativity. The review suggests that biocultural approaches in sustainability science need to move from describing how nature and culture are co-produced to co-producing knowledge for sustainability solutions, and in so doing, better account for questions of power, gender and transformations, which has been largely neglected thus far. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

Keywords

    bio-cultural, conservation, knowledge, social–ecological systems, Sustainable Development Goals, transformation, values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Biocultural approaches to sustainability: A systematic review of the scientific literature. / Hanspach, Jan; Jamila Haider, Lisbeth; Oteros-Rozas, Elisa et al.
In: People and Nature, Vol. 2, No. 3, 03.09.2020, p. 643-659.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer review

Hanspach, J, Jamila Haider, L, Oteros-Rozas, E, Stahl Olafsson, A, Gulsrud, NM, Raymond, CM, Torralba, M, Martín-López, B, Bieling, C, García-Martín, M, Albert, C, Beery, TH, Fagerholm, N, Díaz-Reviriego, I, Drews-Shambroom, A & Plieninger, T 2020, 'Biocultural approaches to sustainability: A systematic review of the scientific literature', People and Nature, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 643-659. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10120
Hanspach, J., Jamila Haider, L., Oteros-Rozas, E., Stahl Olafsson, A., Gulsrud, N. M., Raymond, C. M., Torralba, M., Martín-López, B., Bieling, C., García-Martín, M., Albert, C., Beery, T. H., Fagerholm, N., Díaz-Reviriego, I., Drews-Shambroom, A., & Plieninger, T. (2020). Biocultural approaches to sustainability: A systematic review of the scientific literature. People and Nature, 2(3), 643-659. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10120
Hanspach J, Jamila Haider L, Oteros-Rozas E, Stahl Olafsson A, Gulsrud NM, Raymond CM et al. Biocultural approaches to sustainability: A systematic review of the scientific literature. People and Nature. 2020 Sept 3;2(3):643-659. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10120
Hanspach, Jan ; Jamila Haider, Lisbeth ; Oteros-Rozas, Elisa et al. / Biocultural approaches to sustainability : A systematic review of the scientific literature. In: People and Nature. 2020 ; Vol. 2, No. 3. pp. 643-659.
Download
@article{0ff976f5450346039d2ff2c301e7de59,
title = "Biocultural approaches to sustainability: A systematic review of the scientific literature",
abstract = "Current sustainability challenges demand approaches that acknowledge a plurality of human–nature interactions and worldviews, for which biocultural approaches are considered appropriate and timely. This systematic review analyses the application of biocultural approaches to sustainability in scientific journal articles published between 1990 and 2018 through a mixed methods approach combining qualitative content analysis and quantitative multivariate methods. The study identifies seven distinct biocultural lenses, that is, different ways of understanding and applying biocultural approaches, which to different degrees consider the key aspects of sustainability science—inter- and transdisciplinarity, social justice and normativity. The review suggests that biocultural approaches in sustainability science need to move from describing how nature and culture are co-produced to co-producing knowledge for sustainability solutions, and in so doing, better account for questions of power, gender and transformations, which has been largely neglected thus far. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.",
keywords = "bio-cultural, conservation, knowledge, social–ecological systems, Sustainable Development Goals, transformation, values",
author = "Jan Hanspach and {Jamila Haider}, Lisbeth and Elisa Oteros-Rozas and {Stahl Olafsson}, Anton and Gulsrud, {Natalie M.} and Raymond, {Christopher M.} and Mario Torralba and Berta Mart{\'i}n-L{\'o}pez and Claudia Bieling and Mar{\'i}a Garc{\'i}a-Mart{\'i}n and Christian Albert and Beery, {Thomas H.} and Nora Fagerholm and Isabel D{\'i}az-Reviriego and Annika Drews-Shambroom and Tobias Plieninger",
note = "Funding Information: J.H., I.D.‐R. and A.D.‐S. were funded through a social–ecological junior research group grant by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF; 01UU1903). E.O.‐R. has been funded by Juan de la Cierva Incorporation Fellowship of the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (IJCI‐2017‐34334).",
year = "2020",
month = sep,
day = "3",
doi = "10.1002/pan3.10120",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "643--659",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biocultural approaches to sustainability

T2 - A systematic review of the scientific literature

AU - Hanspach, Jan

AU - Jamila Haider, Lisbeth

AU - Oteros-Rozas, Elisa

AU - Stahl Olafsson, Anton

AU - Gulsrud, Natalie M.

AU - Raymond, Christopher M.

AU - Torralba, Mario

AU - Martín-López, Berta

AU - Bieling, Claudia

AU - García-Martín, María

AU - Albert, Christian

AU - Beery, Thomas H.

AU - Fagerholm, Nora

AU - Díaz-Reviriego, Isabel

AU - Drews-Shambroom, Annika

AU - Plieninger, Tobias

N1 - Funding Information: J.H., I.D.‐R. and A.D.‐S. were funded through a social–ecological junior research group grant by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF; 01UU1903). E.O.‐R. has been funded by Juan de la Cierva Incorporation Fellowship of the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (IJCI‐2017‐34334).

PY - 2020/9/3

Y1 - 2020/9/3

N2 - Current sustainability challenges demand approaches that acknowledge a plurality of human–nature interactions and worldviews, for which biocultural approaches are considered appropriate and timely. This systematic review analyses the application of biocultural approaches to sustainability in scientific journal articles published between 1990 and 2018 through a mixed methods approach combining qualitative content analysis and quantitative multivariate methods. The study identifies seven distinct biocultural lenses, that is, different ways of understanding and applying biocultural approaches, which to different degrees consider the key aspects of sustainability science—inter- and transdisciplinarity, social justice and normativity. The review suggests that biocultural approaches in sustainability science need to move from describing how nature and culture are co-produced to co-producing knowledge for sustainability solutions, and in so doing, better account for questions of power, gender and transformations, which has been largely neglected thus far. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

AB - Current sustainability challenges demand approaches that acknowledge a plurality of human–nature interactions and worldviews, for which biocultural approaches are considered appropriate and timely. This systematic review analyses the application of biocultural approaches to sustainability in scientific journal articles published between 1990 and 2018 through a mixed methods approach combining qualitative content analysis and quantitative multivariate methods. The study identifies seven distinct biocultural lenses, that is, different ways of understanding and applying biocultural approaches, which to different degrees consider the key aspects of sustainability science—inter- and transdisciplinarity, social justice and normativity. The review suggests that biocultural approaches in sustainability science need to move from describing how nature and culture are co-produced to co-producing knowledge for sustainability solutions, and in so doing, better account for questions of power, gender and transformations, which has been largely neglected thus far. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

KW - bio-cultural

KW - conservation

KW - knowledge

KW - social–ecological systems

KW - Sustainable Development Goals

KW - transformation

KW - values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091232439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pan3.10120

DO - 10.1002/pan3.10120

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85091232439

VL - 2

SP - 643

EP - 659

JO - People and Nature

JF - People and Nature

SN - 2575-8314

IS - 3

ER -