Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | GDPR and Biobanking |
| Subtitle of host publication | Individual Rights, Public Interest and Research Regulation across Europe |
| Place of Publication | Cham |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media B.V. |
| Pages | 397-419 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| ISBN (electronic) | 978-3-030-49388-2 |
| ISBN (print) | 978-3-030-49387-5, 978-3-030-49390-5 |
| Publication status | Published - 6 Jan 2021 |
Publication series
| Name | Law, Governance and Technology Series |
|---|---|
| Volume | 43 |
| ISSN (Print) | 2352-1902 |
| ISSN (electronic) | 2352-1910 |
Abstract
This chapter seeks to provide insight into the ways in which Member States leveraged the regulatory discretion afforded to them by the GDPR. Specifically, it reviews the biobank regulatory environment; whether and how derogations under Article 89(2) GDPR are enabled; the legal basis for scientific research and the role of consent in biobanking post-GDPR; the balance between individual rights and public interest in national law; and finally, the GDPR’s impact and future possibilities for biobanking. In exercising self-determination, Member States can, to a certain extent, align data protection requirements with their values and aspirations. Such alignment, though, could jeopardize collaborative research. In light of the need to bridge divergent legal and ethical requirements at a national and supranational level, the role of Research Ethics Committees (RECs) might prove to be essential.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences(all)
- Law
- Computer Science(all)
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computer Science(all)
- Computer Science Applications
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
GDPR and Biobanking: Individual Rights, Public Interest and Research Regulation across Europe. Cham: Springer Science and Business Media B.V., 2021. p. 397-419 (Law, Governance and Technology Series; Vol. 43).
Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceeding › Contribution to book/anthology › Research › peer review
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - Biobanking Across Europe Post-GDPR
T2 - A Deliberately Fragmented Landscape
AU - Tzortzatou, Olga
AU - Slokenberga, Santa
AU - Reichel, Jane
AU - da Costa Andrade, Andreia
AU - Barbosa, Carla
AU - Bekaert, Sofie
AU - van Veen, Evert Ben
AU - Romeo-Casabona, Carlos M.
AU - Cathaoir, Katharina
AU - Chassang, Gauthier
AU - Debucquoy, Annelies
AU - Derèze, Jean Jacques
AU - Dollé, Laurent
AU - Fält, Sonja Eaker
AU - Halouzka, Radek
AU - Hartlev, Mette
AU - Hisbergues, Michael
AU - Hoppe, Nils
AU - Huys, Isabelle
AU - Kindt, Els
AU - Befring, Anne Kjersti
AU - Kozera, Lukasz
AU - Krekora-Zajac, Dorota
AU - Lalova, Teodora
AU - Mayrhofer, Michaela
AU - Negrouk, Anastassia
AU - Pawlikowski, Jakub
AU - Penasa, Simone
AU - Pormeister, Kärt
AU - Rial-Sebbag, Emmanuelle
AU - Siapka, Anastasia
AU - Southerington, Tom
AU - Stenbeck, Magnus
AU - Šutalo, Maja
AU - Tomasi, Marta
AU - Valcke, Peggy
AU - Vella Falzon, Ruth
N1 - Funding Information: The author wishes to thank Anastasia Siapka for her support during all the stages of this Chapter.
PY - 2021/1/6
Y1 - 2021/1/6
N2 - This chapter seeks to provide insight into the ways in which Member States leveraged the regulatory discretion afforded to them by the GDPR. Specifically, it reviews the biobank regulatory environment; whether and how derogations under Article 89(2) GDPR are enabled; the legal basis for scientific research and the role of consent in biobanking post-GDPR; the balance between individual rights and public interest in national law; and finally, the GDPR’s impact and future possibilities for biobanking. In exercising self-determination, Member States can, to a certain extent, align data protection requirements with their values and aspirations. Such alignment, though, could jeopardize collaborative research. In light of the need to bridge divergent legal and ethical requirements at a national and supranational level, the role of Research Ethics Committees (RECs) might prove to be essential.
AB - This chapter seeks to provide insight into the ways in which Member States leveraged the regulatory discretion afforded to them by the GDPR. Specifically, it reviews the biobank regulatory environment; whether and how derogations under Article 89(2) GDPR are enabled; the legal basis for scientific research and the role of consent in biobanking post-GDPR; the balance between individual rights and public interest in national law; and finally, the GDPR’s impact and future possibilities for biobanking. In exercising self-determination, Member States can, to a certain extent, align data protection requirements with their values and aspirations. Such alignment, though, could jeopardize collaborative research. In light of the need to bridge divergent legal and ethical requirements at a national and supranational level, the role of Research Ethics Committees (RECs) might prove to be essential.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120440126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-49388-2_22
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-49388-2_22
M3 - Contribution to book/anthology
AN - SCOPUS:85120440126
SN - 978-3-030-49387-5
SN - 978-3-030-49390-5
T3 - Law, Governance and Technology Series
SP - 397
EP - 419
BT - GDPR and Biobanking
PB - Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
CY - Cham
ER -