Beyond Judicialization: Why We Need More Comparative Research About Constitutional Courts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Christoph Hönnige

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)346–358
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean political science
Volume10
Issue number3
Early online date10 Dec 2010
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2011

Abstract

Constitutional courts play an increasing role in policymaking and the concepts of comparative politics. Traditionally, research has focused on the Judicialization hypothesis for European courts. This article argues that there is a major research gap regarding justices’ preferences, intra- and inter-institutional rules and that it is necessary to move beyond the Judicialization hypothesis to integrate courts in concepts of comparative politics. It outlines four theoretical and methodological challenges for future research on constitutional courts.

Keywords

    comparative politics, constitutional courts, judicialization

Cite this

Beyond Judicialization: Why We Need More Comparative Research About Constitutional Courts. / Hönnige, Christoph.
In: European political science, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.09.2011, p. 346–358.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Hönnige C. Beyond Judicialization: Why We Need More Comparative Research About Constitutional Courts. European political science. 2011 Sept 1;10(3):346–358. Epub 2010 Dec 10. doi: 10.1057/eps.2010.51
Download
@article{7e2867704dca49518afb3c9075ea80a7,
title = "Beyond Judicialization: Why We Need More Comparative Research About Constitutional Courts",
abstract = "Constitutional courts play an increasing role in policymaking and the concepts of comparative politics. Traditionally, research has focused on the Judicialization hypothesis for European courts. This article argues that there is a major research gap regarding justices{\textquoteright} preferences, intra- and inter-institutional rules and that it is necessary to move beyond the Judicialization hypothesis to integrate courts in concepts of comparative politics. It outlines four theoretical and methodological challenges for future research on constitutional courts.",
keywords = "comparative politics, constitutional courts, judicialization",
author = "Christoph H{\"o}nnige",
year = "2011",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1057/eps.2010.51",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "346–358",
journal = "European political science",
issn = "1680-4333",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond Judicialization: Why We Need More Comparative Research About Constitutional Courts

AU - Hönnige, Christoph

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Constitutional courts play an increasing role in policymaking and the concepts of comparative politics. Traditionally, research has focused on the Judicialization hypothesis for European courts. This article argues that there is a major research gap regarding justices’ preferences, intra- and inter-institutional rules and that it is necessary to move beyond the Judicialization hypothesis to integrate courts in concepts of comparative politics. It outlines four theoretical and methodological challenges for future research on constitutional courts.

AB - Constitutional courts play an increasing role in policymaking and the concepts of comparative politics. Traditionally, research has focused on the Judicialization hypothesis for European courts. This article argues that there is a major research gap regarding justices’ preferences, intra- and inter-institutional rules and that it is necessary to move beyond the Judicialization hypothesis to integrate courts in concepts of comparative politics. It outlines four theoretical and methodological challenges for future research on constitutional courts.

KW - comparative politics

KW - constitutional courts

KW - judicialization

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/eps.2010.51

U2 - 10.1057/eps.2010.51

DO - 10.1057/eps.2010.51

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 346

EP - 358

JO - European political science

JF - European political science

SN - 1680-4333

IS - 3

ER -