Between the Poles of Data-Driven and Mechanistic Modeling for Process Operation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

Authors

  • Dörte Solle
  • Bernd Hitzmann
  • Christoph Herwig
  • Manuel Pereira Remelhe
  • Sophia Ulonska
  • Lynn Wuerth
  • Adrian Prata
  • Thomas Steckenreiter

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • University of Hohenheim
  • TU Wien (TUW)
  • Bayer AG
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)542-561
Number of pages20
JournalChemie-Ingenieur-Technik
Volume89
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 6 Apr 2017

Abstract

The best method for process control is the use of model-based solutions, based on process analytical technology for online monitoring of critical process variables, product quality attributes, or a holistic process state estimation. Mechanistic models as well as data-driven techniques are essential for real-time process monitoring. Their main characteristics, advantages and disadvantages, and the link between both are discussed as well as the synergetic effects, benefits, and drawbacks resulting from their combination. Aspects and differences of the computational model life cycle management are highlighted.

Keywords

    Case studies, Chemometric models, Hybrid models, Modeling methodology, Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Between the Poles of Data-Driven and Mechanistic Modeling for Process Operation. / Solle, Dörte; Hitzmann, Bernd; Herwig, Christoph et al.
In: Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik, Vol. 89, No. 5, 06.04.2017, p. 542-561.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

Solle, D, Hitzmann, B, Herwig, C, Pereira Remelhe, M, Ulonska, S, Wuerth, L, Prata, A & Steckenreiter, T 2017, 'Between the Poles of Data-Driven and Mechanistic Modeling for Process Operation', Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 542-561. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201600175
Solle, D., Hitzmann, B., Herwig, C., Pereira Remelhe, M., Ulonska, S., Wuerth, L., Prata, A., & Steckenreiter, T. (2017). Between the Poles of Data-Driven and Mechanistic Modeling for Process Operation. Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik, 89(5), 542-561. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201600175
Solle D, Hitzmann B, Herwig C, Pereira Remelhe M, Ulonska S, Wuerth L et al. Between the Poles of Data-Driven and Mechanistic Modeling for Process Operation. Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik. 2017 Apr 6;89(5):542-561. doi: 10.1002/cite.201600175
Solle, Dörte ; Hitzmann, Bernd ; Herwig, Christoph et al. / Between the Poles of Data-Driven and Mechanistic Modeling for Process Operation. In: Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik. 2017 ; Vol. 89, No. 5. pp. 542-561.
Download
@article{e12be820e61941d9ac2d7474598be03c,
title = "Between the Poles of Data-Driven and Mechanistic Modeling for Process Operation",
abstract = "The best method for process control is the use of model-based solutions, based on process analytical technology for online monitoring of critical process variables, product quality attributes, or a holistic process state estimation. Mechanistic models as well as data-driven techniques are essential for real-time process monitoring. Their main characteristics, advantages and disadvantages, and the link between both are discussed as well as the synergetic effects, benefits, and drawbacks resulting from their combination. Aspects and differences of the computational model life cycle management are highlighted.",
keywords = "Case studies, Chemometric models, Hybrid models, Modeling methodology, Validation",
author = "D{\"o}rte Solle and Bernd Hitzmann and Christoph Herwig and {Pereira Remelhe}, Manuel and Sophia Ulonska and Lynn Wuerth and Adrian Prata and Thomas Steckenreiter",
note = "Funding information: C. Herwig, S. Ulonska: Financial support was provided by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) under the scope of the COMET program within the research project “Industrial Methods for Process Analytical Chemistry – From Measurement Technologies to Information Systems (imPACts)” (contract # 843546). All authors want to thank the workgroup Prozessanalytik of the GDCh and DECHEMA for giving the impetus for preparing this manuscript.",
year = "2017",
month = apr,
day = "6",
doi = "10.1002/cite.201600175",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "542--561",
journal = "Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik",
issn = "0009-286X",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "5",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between the Poles of Data-Driven and Mechanistic Modeling for Process Operation

AU - Solle, Dörte

AU - Hitzmann, Bernd

AU - Herwig, Christoph

AU - Pereira Remelhe, Manuel

AU - Ulonska, Sophia

AU - Wuerth, Lynn

AU - Prata, Adrian

AU - Steckenreiter, Thomas

N1 - Funding information: C. Herwig, S. Ulonska: Financial support was provided by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) under the scope of the COMET program within the research project “Industrial Methods for Process Analytical Chemistry – From Measurement Technologies to Information Systems (imPACts)” (contract # 843546). All authors want to thank the workgroup Prozessanalytik of the GDCh and DECHEMA for giving the impetus for preparing this manuscript.

PY - 2017/4/6

Y1 - 2017/4/6

N2 - The best method for process control is the use of model-based solutions, based on process analytical technology for online monitoring of critical process variables, product quality attributes, or a holistic process state estimation. Mechanistic models as well as data-driven techniques are essential for real-time process monitoring. Their main characteristics, advantages and disadvantages, and the link between both are discussed as well as the synergetic effects, benefits, and drawbacks resulting from their combination. Aspects and differences of the computational model life cycle management are highlighted.

AB - The best method for process control is the use of model-based solutions, based on process analytical technology for online monitoring of critical process variables, product quality attributes, or a holistic process state estimation. Mechanistic models as well as data-driven techniques are essential for real-time process monitoring. Their main characteristics, advantages and disadvantages, and the link between both are discussed as well as the synergetic effects, benefits, and drawbacks resulting from their combination. Aspects and differences of the computational model life cycle management are highlighted.

KW - Case studies

KW - Chemometric models

KW - Hybrid models

KW - Modeling methodology

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017479178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cite.201600175

DO - 10.1002/cite.201600175

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85017479178

VL - 89

SP - 542

EP - 561

JO - Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik

JF - Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik

SN - 0009-286X

IS - 5

ER -

By the same author(s)