Before Name-calling: Dynamics and Triggers of Ad Hominem Fallacies in Web Argumentation

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Technische Universität Darmstadt
  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers)
Pages386-396
Number of pages11
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018
Externally publishedYes
Event2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL HLT 2018 - New Orleans, United States
Duration: 1 Jun 20186 Jun 2018

Abstract

Arguing without committing a fallacy is one of the main requirements of an ideal debate. But even when debating rules are strictly enforced and fallacious arguments punished, arguers often lapse into attacking the opponent by an ad hominem argument. As existing research lacks solid empirical investigation of the typology of ad hominem arguments as well as their potential causes, this paper fills this gap by (1) performing several large-scale annotation studies, (2) experimenting with various neural architectures and validating our working hypotheses, such as controversy or reasonableness, and (3) providing linguistic insights into triggers of ad hominem using explainable neural network architectures.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Before Name-calling: Dynamics and Triggers of Ad Hominem Fallacies in Web Argumentation. / Habernal, Ivan; Wachsmuth, Henning; Gurevych, Iryna et al.
Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). 2018. p. 386-396.

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer review

Habernal, I, Wachsmuth, H, Gurevych, I & Stein, B 2018, Before Name-calling: Dynamics and Triggers of Ad Hominem Fallacies in Web Argumentation. in Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). pp. 386-396, 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL HLT 2018, New Orleans, United States, 1 Jun 2018. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-1036
Habernal, I., Wachsmuth, H., Gurevych, I., & Stein, B. (2018). Before Name-calling: Dynamics and Triggers of Ad Hominem Fallacies in Web Argumentation. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) (pp. 386-396) https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-1036
Habernal I, Wachsmuth H, Gurevych I, Stein B. Before Name-calling: Dynamics and Triggers of Ad Hominem Fallacies in Web Argumentation. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). 2018. p. 386-396 doi: 10.18653/v1/N18-1036
Habernal, Ivan ; Wachsmuth, Henning ; Gurevych, Iryna et al. / Before Name-calling : Dynamics and Triggers of Ad Hominem Fallacies in Web Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). 2018. pp. 386-396
Download
@inproceedings{d56af859f9c74c77829ac34d270c3dff,
title = "Before Name-calling: Dynamics and Triggers of Ad Hominem Fallacies in Web Argumentation",
abstract = "Arguing without committing a fallacy is one of the main requirements of an ideal debate. But even when debating rules are strictly enforced and fallacious arguments punished, arguers often lapse into attacking the opponent by an ad hominem argument. As existing research lacks solid empirical investigation of the typology of ad hominem arguments as well as their potential causes, this paper fills this gap by (1) performing several large-scale annotation studies, (2) experimenting with various neural architectures and validating our working hypotheses, such as controversy or reasonableness, and (3) providing linguistic insights into triggers of ad hominem using explainable neural network architectures.",
author = "Ivan Habernal and Henning Wachsmuth and Iryna Gurevych and Benno Stein",
note = "Funding Information: This work has been supported by the ArguAna Project GU 798/20-1 (DFG), and by the DFG-funded research training group “Adaptive Preparation of Information form Heterogeneous Sources” (AIPHES, GRK 1994/1).; 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL HLT 2018 ; Conference date: 01-06-2018 Through 06-06-2018",
year = "2018",
month = jun,
doi = "10.18653/v1/N18-1036",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781948087278",
pages = "386--396",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers)",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - Before Name-calling

T2 - 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL HLT 2018

AU - Habernal, Ivan

AU - Wachsmuth, Henning

AU - Gurevych, Iryna

AU - Stein, Benno

N1 - Funding Information: This work has been supported by the ArguAna Project GU 798/20-1 (DFG), and by the DFG-funded research training group “Adaptive Preparation of Information form Heterogeneous Sources” (AIPHES, GRK 1994/1).

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - Arguing without committing a fallacy is one of the main requirements of an ideal debate. But even when debating rules are strictly enforced and fallacious arguments punished, arguers often lapse into attacking the opponent by an ad hominem argument. As existing research lacks solid empirical investigation of the typology of ad hominem arguments as well as their potential causes, this paper fills this gap by (1) performing several large-scale annotation studies, (2) experimenting with various neural architectures and validating our working hypotheses, such as controversy or reasonableness, and (3) providing linguistic insights into triggers of ad hominem using explainable neural network architectures.

AB - Arguing without committing a fallacy is one of the main requirements of an ideal debate. But even when debating rules are strictly enforced and fallacious arguments punished, arguers often lapse into attacking the opponent by an ad hominem argument. As existing research lacks solid empirical investigation of the typology of ad hominem arguments as well as their potential causes, this paper fills this gap by (1) performing several large-scale annotation studies, (2) experimenting with various neural architectures and validating our working hypotheses, such as controversy or reasonableness, and (3) providing linguistic insights into triggers of ad hominem using explainable neural network architectures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074906655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18653/v1/N18-1036

DO - 10.18653/v1/N18-1036

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85074906655

SN - 9781948087278

SP - 386

EP - 396

BT - Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers)

Y2 - 1 June 2018 through 6 June 2018

ER -

By the same author(s)