Attitudes of political-administrative decision makers towards the implementation of nature-based solutions in water management–a case study on a hypothetical constructed wetland in the Tárcoles River basin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Franka Pätzke
  • Christoph Schulze
  • Jochen Hack
  • Karina Castro-Arce
  • Veronica Alejandra Neumann
  • Barbara Schröter

External Research Organisations

  • Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)
  • Universidad de Costa Rica
  • Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies (LUCSUS)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number2339228
JournalEcosystems and People
Volume20
Issue number1
Early online date20 May 2024
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Abstract

Nature-based solutions (NBS) are actions that help communities address social-ecological challenges such as flooding and polluted groundwater. Nevertheless, research shows that in practice, NBS confront several barriers in planning and implementation, many of which are related to the different attitudes of political and administrative actors. There is knowledge missing on their viewpoints on NBS. We used Q-methodology to explore the attitudes towards the implementation of a constructed wetland as NBS, interviewing decision-makers from the Tárcoles River Basin Commission in Costa Rica, the administrative body in charge of the integrated management of the river. We determined three recognizable viewpoints: ‘the nature lover’, ‘the cost concerned’, and ‘the participation seeker’. Although all members of the commission shared a common vision, it was clear that their priorities differed. Regarding the ways of implementing NBS, interviewees agreed that the country urges a paradigm shift in policy design towards ecosystem-based approaches and emphasized the need for more cooperation among bodies of administration in river basin decision-making. We reflect on the lessons learned to improve planning and implementation of NBS, such as the importance of increasing knowledge and awareness of NBS, the support from all governance levels as well as the cooperation of researchers and policy-makers, and the consideration of NBS financing by private companies.

Keywords

    constructed wetlands, Costa Rica, flood protection, greywater treatment, Q-methodology, river restoration, Torsten Krause

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Attitudes of political-administrative decision makers towards the implementation of nature-based solutions in water management–a case study on a hypothetical constructed wetland in the Tárcoles River basin. / Pätzke, Franka; Schulze, Christoph; Hack, Jochen et al.
In: Ecosystems and People, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2339228, 2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Pätzke F, Schulze C, Hack J, Castro-Arce K, Neumann VA, Schröter B. Attitudes of political-administrative decision makers towards the implementation of nature-based solutions in water management–a case study on a hypothetical constructed wetland in the Tárcoles River basin. Ecosystems and People. 2024;20(1):2339228. Epub 2024 May 20. doi: 10.1080/26395916.2024.2339228
Download
@article{b86009703d684c65b501fdc25b8f177b,
title = "Attitudes of political-administrative decision makers towards the implementation of nature-based solutions in water management–a case study on a hypothetical constructed wetland in the T{\'a}rcoles River basin",
abstract = "Nature-based solutions (NBS) are actions that help communities address social-ecological challenges such as flooding and polluted groundwater. Nevertheless, research shows that in practice, NBS confront several barriers in planning and implementation, many of which are related to the different attitudes of political and administrative actors. There is knowledge missing on their viewpoints on NBS. We used Q-methodology to explore the attitudes towards the implementation of a constructed wetland as NBS, interviewing decision-makers from the T{\'a}rcoles River Basin Commission in Costa Rica, the administrative body in charge of the integrated management of the river. We determined three recognizable viewpoints: {\textquoteleft}the nature lover{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}the cost concerned{\textquoteright}, and {\textquoteleft}the participation seeker{\textquoteright}. Although all members of the commission shared a common vision, it was clear that their priorities differed. Regarding the ways of implementing NBS, interviewees agreed that the country urges a paradigm shift in policy design towards ecosystem-based approaches and emphasized the need for more cooperation among bodies of administration in river basin decision-making. We reflect on the lessons learned to improve planning and implementation of NBS, such as the importance of increasing knowledge and awareness of NBS, the support from all governance levels as well as the cooperation of researchers and policy-makers, and the consideration of NBS financing by private companies.",
keywords = "constructed wetlands, Costa Rica, flood protection, greywater treatment, Q-methodology, river restoration, Torsten Krause",
author = "Franka P{\"a}tzke and Christoph Schulze and Jochen Hack and Karina Castro-Arce and Neumann, {Veronica Alejandra} and Barbara Schr{\"o}ter",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1080/26395916.2024.2339228",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes of political-administrative decision makers towards the implementation of nature-based solutions in water management–a case study on a hypothetical constructed wetland in the Tárcoles River basin

AU - Pätzke, Franka

AU - Schulze, Christoph

AU - Hack, Jochen

AU - Castro-Arce, Karina

AU - Neumann, Veronica Alejandra

AU - Schröter, Barbara

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Nature-based solutions (NBS) are actions that help communities address social-ecological challenges such as flooding and polluted groundwater. Nevertheless, research shows that in practice, NBS confront several barriers in planning and implementation, many of which are related to the different attitudes of political and administrative actors. There is knowledge missing on their viewpoints on NBS. We used Q-methodology to explore the attitudes towards the implementation of a constructed wetland as NBS, interviewing decision-makers from the Tárcoles River Basin Commission in Costa Rica, the administrative body in charge of the integrated management of the river. We determined three recognizable viewpoints: ‘the nature lover’, ‘the cost concerned’, and ‘the participation seeker’. Although all members of the commission shared a common vision, it was clear that their priorities differed. Regarding the ways of implementing NBS, interviewees agreed that the country urges a paradigm shift in policy design towards ecosystem-based approaches and emphasized the need for more cooperation among bodies of administration in river basin decision-making. We reflect on the lessons learned to improve planning and implementation of NBS, such as the importance of increasing knowledge and awareness of NBS, the support from all governance levels as well as the cooperation of researchers and policy-makers, and the consideration of NBS financing by private companies.

AB - Nature-based solutions (NBS) are actions that help communities address social-ecological challenges such as flooding and polluted groundwater. Nevertheless, research shows that in practice, NBS confront several barriers in planning and implementation, many of which are related to the different attitudes of political and administrative actors. There is knowledge missing on their viewpoints on NBS. We used Q-methodology to explore the attitudes towards the implementation of a constructed wetland as NBS, interviewing decision-makers from the Tárcoles River Basin Commission in Costa Rica, the administrative body in charge of the integrated management of the river. We determined three recognizable viewpoints: ‘the nature lover’, ‘the cost concerned’, and ‘the participation seeker’. Although all members of the commission shared a common vision, it was clear that their priorities differed. Regarding the ways of implementing NBS, interviewees agreed that the country urges a paradigm shift in policy design towards ecosystem-based approaches and emphasized the need for more cooperation among bodies of administration in river basin decision-making. We reflect on the lessons learned to improve planning and implementation of NBS, such as the importance of increasing knowledge and awareness of NBS, the support from all governance levels as well as the cooperation of researchers and policy-makers, and the consideration of NBS financing by private companies.

KW - constructed wetlands

KW - Costa Rica

KW - flood protection

KW - greywater treatment

KW - Q-methodology

KW - river restoration

KW - Torsten Krause

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193682146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/26395916.2024.2339228

DO - 10.1080/26395916.2024.2339228

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85193682146

VL - 20

JO - Ecosystems and People

JF - Ecosystems and People

SN - 2639-5908

IS - 1

M1 - 2339228

ER -

By the same author(s)