Aroma development in high pressure treated beef and chicken meat compared to raw and heat treated

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Sabrina Schindler
  • Ulrich Krings
  • Ralf G. Berger
  • Vibeke Orlien

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • University of Copenhagen
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-323
Number of pages7
JournalMeat science
Volume86
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 10 May 2010

Abstract

Chicken breast and beef muscle were treated at 400 and 600. MPa for 15. min at 5°C and compared to raw meat and a heated sample (100°C for 15. min). Vacuum-packed beef meat with a smaller fraction of unsaturated fatty acids showed better oxidative stability during 14. days of cold storage, as shown by a low steady-state level of hydroperoxide values, than vacuum-packed chicken meat. Accordingly, the critical pressures of 400. MPa and 600. MPa for chicken breast and beef sirloin, respectively, were established. Volatiles released after opening of the meat bags or during storage of open meat bags, simulating consumer behaviour, were measured under conditions mimicking eating. Quantitative and olfactory analysis of pressurised meat gave a total of 46 flavour volatiles, mainly alcohols (11), aldehydes (15), and ketones (11), but all in low abundance after 14. days of storage. Overall, beef meat contained less volatiles and in lower abundance (factor of 5) compared to chicken meat. The most important odour active volatiles (GC-O) were well below the detection thresholds necessary to impart a perceivable off-flavour. Lipid oxidation was significantly accelerated during 24. h of cold storage in both cooked chicken and beef when exposed to oxygen, while the pressurised and oxygen-exposed chicken and beef meat remained stable. Pressure treatment of beef and chicken did not induce severe changes of their raw aroma profiles.

Keywords

    Aroma, Beef, Chicken, High pressure, Lipid oxidation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Aroma development in high pressure treated beef and chicken meat compared to raw and heat treated. / Schindler, Sabrina; Krings, Ulrich; Berger, Ralf G. et al.
In: Meat science, Vol. 86, No. 2, 10.05.2010, p. 317-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Schindler S, Krings U, Berger RG, Orlien V. Aroma development in high pressure treated beef and chicken meat compared to raw and heat treated. Meat science. 2010 May 10;86(2):317-323. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.036
Schindler, Sabrina ; Krings, Ulrich ; Berger, Ralf G. et al. / Aroma development in high pressure treated beef and chicken meat compared to raw and heat treated. In: Meat science. 2010 ; Vol. 86, No. 2. pp. 317-323.
Download
@article{ecb9e163be6f49a39d4c4ed76f6a563a,
title = "Aroma development in high pressure treated beef and chicken meat compared to raw and heat treated",
abstract = "Chicken breast and beef muscle were treated at 400 and 600. MPa for 15. min at 5°C and compared to raw meat and a heated sample (100°C for 15. min). Vacuum-packed beef meat with a smaller fraction of unsaturated fatty acids showed better oxidative stability during 14. days of cold storage, as shown by a low steady-state level of hydroperoxide values, than vacuum-packed chicken meat. Accordingly, the critical pressures of 400. MPa and 600. MPa for chicken breast and beef sirloin, respectively, were established. Volatiles released after opening of the meat bags or during storage of open meat bags, simulating consumer behaviour, were measured under conditions mimicking eating. Quantitative and olfactory analysis of pressurised meat gave a total of 46 flavour volatiles, mainly alcohols (11), aldehydes (15), and ketones (11), but all in low abundance after 14. days of storage. Overall, beef meat contained less volatiles and in lower abundance (factor of 5) compared to chicken meat. The most important odour active volatiles (GC-O) were well below the detection thresholds necessary to impart a perceivable off-flavour. Lipid oxidation was significantly accelerated during 24. h of cold storage in both cooked chicken and beef when exposed to oxygen, while the pressurised and oxygen-exposed chicken and beef meat remained stable. Pressure treatment of beef and chicken did not induce severe changes of their raw aroma profiles.",
keywords = "Aroma, Beef, Chicken, High pressure, Lipid oxidation",
author = "Sabrina Schindler and Ulrich Krings and Berger, {Ralf G.} and Vibeke Orlien",
year = "2010",
month = may,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.036",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "317--323",
journal = "Meat science",
issn = "0309-1740",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aroma development in high pressure treated beef and chicken meat compared to raw and heat treated

AU - Schindler, Sabrina

AU - Krings, Ulrich

AU - Berger, Ralf G.

AU - Orlien, Vibeke

PY - 2010/5/10

Y1 - 2010/5/10

N2 - Chicken breast and beef muscle were treated at 400 and 600. MPa for 15. min at 5°C and compared to raw meat and a heated sample (100°C for 15. min). Vacuum-packed beef meat with a smaller fraction of unsaturated fatty acids showed better oxidative stability during 14. days of cold storage, as shown by a low steady-state level of hydroperoxide values, than vacuum-packed chicken meat. Accordingly, the critical pressures of 400. MPa and 600. MPa for chicken breast and beef sirloin, respectively, were established. Volatiles released after opening of the meat bags or during storage of open meat bags, simulating consumer behaviour, were measured under conditions mimicking eating. Quantitative and olfactory analysis of pressurised meat gave a total of 46 flavour volatiles, mainly alcohols (11), aldehydes (15), and ketones (11), but all in low abundance after 14. days of storage. Overall, beef meat contained less volatiles and in lower abundance (factor of 5) compared to chicken meat. The most important odour active volatiles (GC-O) were well below the detection thresholds necessary to impart a perceivable off-flavour. Lipid oxidation was significantly accelerated during 24. h of cold storage in both cooked chicken and beef when exposed to oxygen, while the pressurised and oxygen-exposed chicken and beef meat remained stable. Pressure treatment of beef and chicken did not induce severe changes of their raw aroma profiles.

AB - Chicken breast and beef muscle were treated at 400 and 600. MPa for 15. min at 5°C and compared to raw meat and a heated sample (100°C for 15. min). Vacuum-packed beef meat with a smaller fraction of unsaturated fatty acids showed better oxidative stability during 14. days of cold storage, as shown by a low steady-state level of hydroperoxide values, than vacuum-packed chicken meat. Accordingly, the critical pressures of 400. MPa and 600. MPa for chicken breast and beef sirloin, respectively, were established. Volatiles released after opening of the meat bags or during storage of open meat bags, simulating consumer behaviour, were measured under conditions mimicking eating. Quantitative and olfactory analysis of pressurised meat gave a total of 46 flavour volatiles, mainly alcohols (11), aldehydes (15), and ketones (11), but all in low abundance after 14. days of storage. Overall, beef meat contained less volatiles and in lower abundance (factor of 5) compared to chicken meat. The most important odour active volatiles (GC-O) were well below the detection thresholds necessary to impart a perceivable off-flavour. Lipid oxidation was significantly accelerated during 24. h of cold storage in both cooked chicken and beef when exposed to oxygen, while the pressurised and oxygen-exposed chicken and beef meat remained stable. Pressure treatment of beef and chicken did not induce severe changes of their raw aroma profiles.

KW - Aroma

KW - Beef

KW - Chicken

KW - High pressure

KW - Lipid oxidation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955087292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.036

DO - 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.036

M3 - Article

C2 - 20554122

AN - SCOPUS:77955087292

VL - 86

SP - 317

EP - 323

JO - Meat science

JF - Meat science

SN - 0309-1740

IS - 2

ER -