Arbeitsökonomische Forschung: Theoretisch und empirisch fundiert, ergebnisoffen – eine Replik auf „Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt“

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Bernd Fitzenberger
  • Olaf Hübler
  • Kornelius Kraft

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • University of Freiburg
  • TU Dortmund University
View graph of relations

Details

Translated title of the contributionResearch in labour economics: theoretically and empirically sound, without bias or preconceived conclusions – a reply to “The tale of the inflexible German labour market”
Original languageMultiple languages
Pages (from-to)99-106
Number of pages8
JournalZeitschrift fur Arbeitsmarktforschung
Volume42
Issue number1
Early online date28 Mar 2009
Publication statusPublished - May 2009

Abstract

In his article “The tale of the inflexible German labour market” (“Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt”) in this issue of the Journal for Labour Market Research (ZAF) Werner Sengenberger criticises our introductory paper “Potentials for flexibility in heterogeneous labour markets – an introduction”, which was published in issue 2/3 of the ZAF in 2008 (Fitzenberger et al. 2008). In this reply, we comment on the accusations expressed. Our introductory paper was written as an introduction to the research programme ``Flexibility in Heterogeneous Labour Markets”, which has been funded by the DFG since 2004, and refers explicitly to the status of literature on labour economics prior to 2003. This explains some of the misunderstandings and errors in Sengenberger's reception of our paper. We reject the accusations of theoretical bias and a lack of knowledge of the literature. The reply explains key developments in labour economics research and emphasises their lack of bias and preconceived conclusions. In addition the paper includes a summary of some important findings from current research in labour economics in Germany both in the context of the DFG research programme and outside it.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Arbeitsökonomische Forschung: Theoretisch und empirisch fundiert, ergebnisoffen – eine Replik auf „Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt“. / Fitzenberger, Bernd; Hübler, Olaf; Kraft, Kornelius.
In: Zeitschrift fur Arbeitsmarktforschung, Vol. 42, No. 1, 05.2009, p. 99-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Fitzenberger B, Hübler O, Kraft K. Arbeitsökonomische Forschung: Theoretisch und empirisch fundiert, ergebnisoffen – eine Replik auf „Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt“. Zeitschrift fur Arbeitsmarktforschung. 2009 May;42(1):99-106. Epub 2009 Mar 28. doi: 10.1007/s12651-009-0012-z
Fitzenberger, Bernd ; Hübler, Olaf ; Kraft, Kornelius. / Arbeitsökonomische Forschung : Theoretisch und empirisch fundiert, ergebnisoffen – eine Replik auf „Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt“. In: Zeitschrift fur Arbeitsmarktforschung. 2009 ; Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. 99-106.
Download
@article{19aacaec45c245529b33b1aa4b2c180c,
title = "Arbeits{\"o}konomische Forschung: Theoretisch und empirisch fundiert, ergebnisoffen – eine Replik auf „Die M{\"a}r vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt“",
abstract = "In his article “The tale of the inflexible German labour market” (“Die M{\"a}r vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt”) in this issue of the Journal for Labour Market Research (ZAF) Werner Sengenberger criticises our introductory paper “Potentials for flexibility in heterogeneous labour markets – an introduction”, which was published in issue 2/3 of the ZAF in 2008 (Fitzenberger et al. 2008). In this reply, we comment on the accusations expressed. Our introductory paper was written as an introduction to the research programme ``Flexibility in Heterogeneous Labour Markets”, which has been funded by the DFG since 2004, and refers explicitly to the status of literature on labour economics prior to 2003. This explains some of the misunderstandings and errors in Sengenberger's reception of our paper. We reject the accusations of theoretical bias and a lack of knowledge of the literature. The reply explains key developments in labour economics research and emphasises their lack of bias and preconceived conclusions. In addition the paper includes a summary of some important findings from current research in labour economics in Germany both in the context of the DFG research programme and outside it.",
author = "Bernd Fitzenberger and Olaf H{\"u}bler and Kornelius Kraft",
note = "Funding Information: Abstract In his article “The tale of the inflexible German labour market” (“Die M{\"a}r vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt”) in this issue of the Journal for Labour Market Research (ZAF) Werner Sengenberger criticises our introductory paper “Potentials for flexibility in heterogeneous labour markets – an introduction”, which was published in issue 2/3 of the ZAF in 2008 (Fitzenberger et al. 2008). In this reply, we comment on the accusations expressed. Our introductory paper was written as an introduction to the research programme “Flexibility in Heterogeneous Labour Markets”, which has been funded by the DFG since 2004, and refers explicitly to the status of literature on labour economics prior to 2003. This explains some of the misunderstandings and errors in Sengenberger{\textquoteright}s reception of our paper. We reject the accusations of theoretical bias and a lack of knowledge of the literature. The reply explains key developments in labour economics research and emphasises their lack of bias and preconceived conclusions. In addition the paper includes a summary of some important findings from current research in labour economics in Germany both in the context of the DFG research programme and outside it. ",
year = "2009",
month = may,
doi = "10.1007/s12651-009-0012-z",
language = "Multiple languages",
volume = "42",
pages = "99--106",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Arbeitsökonomische Forschung

T2 - Theoretisch und empirisch fundiert, ergebnisoffen – eine Replik auf „Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt“

AU - Fitzenberger, Bernd

AU - Hübler, Olaf

AU - Kraft, Kornelius

N1 - Funding Information: Abstract In his article “The tale of the inflexible German labour market” (“Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt”) in this issue of the Journal for Labour Market Research (ZAF) Werner Sengenberger criticises our introductory paper “Potentials for flexibility in heterogeneous labour markets – an introduction”, which was published in issue 2/3 of the ZAF in 2008 (Fitzenberger et al. 2008). In this reply, we comment on the accusations expressed. Our introductory paper was written as an introduction to the research programme “Flexibility in Heterogeneous Labour Markets”, which has been funded by the DFG since 2004, and refers explicitly to the status of literature on labour economics prior to 2003. This explains some of the misunderstandings and errors in Sengenberger’s reception of our paper. We reject the accusations of theoretical bias and a lack of knowledge of the literature. The reply explains key developments in labour economics research and emphasises their lack of bias and preconceived conclusions. In addition the paper includes a summary of some important findings from current research in labour economics in Germany both in the context of the DFG research programme and outside it.

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - In his article “The tale of the inflexible German labour market” (“Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt”) in this issue of the Journal for Labour Market Research (ZAF) Werner Sengenberger criticises our introductory paper “Potentials for flexibility in heterogeneous labour markets – an introduction”, which was published in issue 2/3 of the ZAF in 2008 (Fitzenberger et al. 2008). In this reply, we comment on the accusations expressed. Our introductory paper was written as an introduction to the research programme ``Flexibility in Heterogeneous Labour Markets”, which has been funded by the DFG since 2004, and refers explicitly to the status of literature on labour economics prior to 2003. This explains some of the misunderstandings and errors in Sengenberger's reception of our paper. We reject the accusations of theoretical bias and a lack of knowledge of the literature. The reply explains key developments in labour economics research and emphasises their lack of bias and preconceived conclusions. In addition the paper includes a summary of some important findings from current research in labour economics in Germany both in the context of the DFG research programme and outside it.

AB - In his article “The tale of the inflexible German labour market” (“Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt”) in this issue of the Journal for Labour Market Research (ZAF) Werner Sengenberger criticises our introductory paper “Potentials for flexibility in heterogeneous labour markets – an introduction”, which was published in issue 2/3 of the ZAF in 2008 (Fitzenberger et al. 2008). In this reply, we comment on the accusations expressed. Our introductory paper was written as an introduction to the research programme ``Flexibility in Heterogeneous Labour Markets”, which has been funded by the DFG since 2004, and refers explicitly to the status of literature on labour economics prior to 2003. This explains some of the misunderstandings and errors in Sengenberger's reception of our paper. We reject the accusations of theoretical bias and a lack of knowledge of the literature. The reply explains key developments in labour economics research and emphasises their lack of bias and preconceived conclusions. In addition the paper includes a summary of some important findings from current research in labour economics in Germany both in the context of the DFG research programme and outside it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975296984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12651-009-0012-z

DO - 10.1007/s12651-009-0012-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84975296984

VL - 42

SP - 99

EP - 106

JO - Zeitschrift fur Arbeitsmarktforschung

JF - Zeitschrift fur Arbeitsmarktforschung

SN - 1867-8343

IS - 1

ER -