Ar, CO2 and H2O diffusion in silica glasses at 2kbar pressure

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Harald Behrens

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-48
Number of pages9
JournalChemical geology
Volume272
Issue number1-4
Early online date8 Feb 2010
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2010

Abstract

The diffusion of volatiles into silica glasses was studied by sorption experiments in argon gas pressure vessels at 2kbar and temperatures from 521 to 1097°C. In the experiments either Ar and H2O (AH series, samples in open containers), or CO2 and H2O (CH series, samples in closed noble metal capsules with silver oxalate added as source for CO2) could exchange between the fluid and the glasses. Both sample assemblies were run simultaneously to enable direct comparison of diffusion data. Profiles were recorded on sections perpendicular to the initial surfaces by electron microprobe (Ar) and FTIR spectroscopy (CO2 and H2O). Ar diffusion is systematically slower by 0.17log units in average in water-rich silica glass (~0.05wt.% H2O, Suprasil®) than in water-poor silica glasses (<0.01wt.% H2O, Infrasil® and Herasil®) while the activation energy for argon diffusion agrees within error. This effect is attributed to partial closure of doorways for argon in the silicate network by the formation of hydroxyl groups. CO2 is dissolved only as molecular species in silica glasses and its diffusivity is about the same as that of argon, similar as found for rhyolitic glasses. Dissolved H2O was detected in the run products exclusively in form of silanol groups. The H2O profiles show systematic deviations from error function shape. The shape of the profiles could originate from either a positive correlation of water diffusivity to water content or a continuous decrease in water fugacity in the fluid. H2O was only a minor component in the fluids and the condition of an infinite reservoir was not necessarily always ensured during the whole run. Assuming negligible decrease of water fugacity during experiment, diffusion coefficients of H2O (DH2O) were determined by a Boltzmann-Matano analysis. The data are consistent with DH2O being proportional to the concentration of dissolved water.

Keywords

    Argon, CO, Diffusion, HO, IR spectroscopy, Silica glass

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Ar, CO2 and H2O diffusion in silica glasses at 2kbar pressure. / Behrens, Harald.
In: Chemical geology, Vol. 272, No. 1-4, 15.04.2010, p. 40-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Behrens H. Ar, CO2 and H2O diffusion in silica glasses at 2kbar pressure. Chemical geology. 2010 Apr 15;272(1-4):40-48. Epub 2010 Feb 8. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.02.001
Behrens, Harald. / Ar, CO2 and H2O diffusion in silica glasses at 2kbar pressure. In: Chemical geology. 2010 ; Vol. 272, No. 1-4. pp. 40-48.
Download
@article{23e559266fa548679dfcdd916e8fd5c9,
title = "Ar, CO2 and H2O diffusion in silica glasses at 2kbar pressure",
abstract = "The diffusion of volatiles into silica glasses was studied by sorption experiments in argon gas pressure vessels at 2kbar and temperatures from 521 to 1097°C. In the experiments either Ar and H2O (AH series, samples in open containers), or CO2 and H2O (CH series, samples in closed noble metal capsules with silver oxalate added as source for CO2) could exchange between the fluid and the glasses. Both sample assemblies were run simultaneously to enable direct comparison of diffusion data. Profiles were recorded on sections perpendicular to the initial surfaces by electron microprobe (Ar) and FTIR spectroscopy (CO2 and H2O). Ar diffusion is systematically slower by 0.17log units in average in water-rich silica glass (~0.05wt.% H2O, Suprasil{\textregistered}) than in water-poor silica glasses (<0.01wt.% H2O, Infrasil{\textregistered} and Herasil{\textregistered}) while the activation energy for argon diffusion agrees within error. This effect is attributed to partial closure of doorways for argon in the silicate network by the formation of hydroxyl groups. CO2 is dissolved only as molecular species in silica glasses and its diffusivity is about the same as that of argon, similar as found for rhyolitic glasses. Dissolved H2O was detected in the run products exclusively in form of silanol groups. The H2O profiles show systematic deviations from error function shape. The shape of the profiles could originate from either a positive correlation of water diffusivity to water content or a continuous decrease in water fugacity in the fluid. H2O was only a minor component in the fluids and the condition of an infinite reservoir was not necessarily always ensured during the whole run. Assuming negligible decrease of water fugacity during experiment, diffusion coefficients of H2O (DH2O) were determined by a Boltzmann-Matano analysis. The data are consistent with DH2O being proportional to the concentration of dissolved water.",
keywords = "Argon, CO, Diffusion, HO, IR spectroscopy, Silica glass",
author = "Harald Behrens",
note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG) . The author thanks the following undergraduate students who contribute to the research: O. Beermann, I. Eberle, M. Haack, C. Kirchner, L. Robben, and J.A. Schuessler. Technical assistance of W. Dziony (microprobe) and W. Dietrich (sample preparation) is acknowledged as well.",
year = "2010",
month = apr,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.02.001",
language = "English",
volume = "272",
pages = "40--48",
journal = "Chemical geology",
issn = "0009-2541",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ar, CO2 and H2O diffusion in silica glasses at 2kbar pressure

AU - Behrens, Harald

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG) . The author thanks the following undergraduate students who contribute to the research: O. Beermann, I. Eberle, M. Haack, C. Kirchner, L. Robben, and J.A. Schuessler. Technical assistance of W. Dziony (microprobe) and W. Dietrich (sample preparation) is acknowledged as well.

PY - 2010/4/15

Y1 - 2010/4/15

N2 - The diffusion of volatiles into silica glasses was studied by sorption experiments in argon gas pressure vessels at 2kbar and temperatures from 521 to 1097°C. In the experiments either Ar and H2O (AH series, samples in open containers), or CO2 and H2O (CH series, samples in closed noble metal capsules with silver oxalate added as source for CO2) could exchange between the fluid and the glasses. Both sample assemblies were run simultaneously to enable direct comparison of diffusion data. Profiles were recorded on sections perpendicular to the initial surfaces by electron microprobe (Ar) and FTIR spectroscopy (CO2 and H2O). Ar diffusion is systematically slower by 0.17log units in average in water-rich silica glass (~0.05wt.% H2O, Suprasil®) than in water-poor silica glasses (<0.01wt.% H2O, Infrasil® and Herasil®) while the activation energy for argon diffusion agrees within error. This effect is attributed to partial closure of doorways for argon in the silicate network by the formation of hydroxyl groups. CO2 is dissolved only as molecular species in silica glasses and its diffusivity is about the same as that of argon, similar as found for rhyolitic glasses. Dissolved H2O was detected in the run products exclusively in form of silanol groups. The H2O profiles show systematic deviations from error function shape. The shape of the profiles could originate from either a positive correlation of water diffusivity to water content or a continuous decrease in water fugacity in the fluid. H2O was only a minor component in the fluids and the condition of an infinite reservoir was not necessarily always ensured during the whole run. Assuming negligible decrease of water fugacity during experiment, diffusion coefficients of H2O (DH2O) were determined by a Boltzmann-Matano analysis. The data are consistent with DH2O being proportional to the concentration of dissolved water.

AB - The diffusion of volatiles into silica glasses was studied by sorption experiments in argon gas pressure vessels at 2kbar and temperatures from 521 to 1097°C. In the experiments either Ar and H2O (AH series, samples in open containers), or CO2 and H2O (CH series, samples in closed noble metal capsules with silver oxalate added as source for CO2) could exchange between the fluid and the glasses. Both sample assemblies were run simultaneously to enable direct comparison of diffusion data. Profiles were recorded on sections perpendicular to the initial surfaces by electron microprobe (Ar) and FTIR spectroscopy (CO2 and H2O). Ar diffusion is systematically slower by 0.17log units in average in water-rich silica glass (~0.05wt.% H2O, Suprasil®) than in water-poor silica glasses (<0.01wt.% H2O, Infrasil® and Herasil®) while the activation energy for argon diffusion agrees within error. This effect is attributed to partial closure of doorways for argon in the silicate network by the formation of hydroxyl groups. CO2 is dissolved only as molecular species in silica glasses and its diffusivity is about the same as that of argon, similar as found for rhyolitic glasses. Dissolved H2O was detected in the run products exclusively in form of silanol groups. The H2O profiles show systematic deviations from error function shape. The shape of the profiles could originate from either a positive correlation of water diffusivity to water content or a continuous decrease in water fugacity in the fluid. H2O was only a minor component in the fluids and the condition of an infinite reservoir was not necessarily always ensured during the whole run. Assuming negligible decrease of water fugacity during experiment, diffusion coefficients of H2O (DH2O) were determined by a Boltzmann-Matano analysis. The data are consistent with DH2O being proportional to the concentration of dissolved water.

KW - Argon

KW - CO

KW - Diffusion

KW - HO

KW - IR spectroscopy

KW - Silica glass

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950630111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.02.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77950630111

VL - 272

SP - 40

EP - 48

JO - Chemical geology

JF - Chemical geology

SN - 0009-2541

IS - 1-4

ER -